BREAKING NEWS The video release of this document will be September 11 2008! (War by Way of Deception)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK6VLFdWJ4I" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
more videos on http://ancreport.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxhtKR8tV1I" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXO_IS6IiUs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ryan Dawson 911, Iraq, PNAC , All roads lead to Israel
When some people hear the word "conspiracy" they start thinking of a tinfoil hat crowd and invoke images of space aliens, paranoia, or a variety of cults and nonsense. Well there are a lot of wacky conspiracies about many things but that does not mean that conspiracies don't or can't happen. For example, the Iran Contra Affair was a massive government conspiracy hidden from the press and public for years. It happened in my life time and it involved billions of dollars and multiple countries. It has since been admitted to but many of the people involved did not get into trouble. They were given presidential pardons either by Bush Sr. or Bill Clinton. Most of them still have jobs and are working in the government right now! That is a fact. The CIA and Mossad have gotten away with countless covert operations and false flags. There are too many to name. So for those who think a covert operation or conspiracy can't happen, you need to open a history book, or at the very least start doing some online research. To just reject conspiracies as a whole just because there are some kooks who think the moon landing was fake or Elvis or Tu Pac are still alive etc is not a reason to just reject the concept all together. I have had people tell me conspiracies never work and that they can't be done because someone always snitches. Well that argument just does not float in reality. There are way too many counter examples of successful conspiracies and Hoaxes. See here CIA's Secret Wars and that's only a fraction.
What really happened on 911? Poll after poll the majority of Americans believe that the official story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. (Compare that to Fox News Viewers who staggeringly still blieve in the lies of Saddam being linked to 911 even after the president and vice president admitted that there was no conneciton.) There seem to be four main 911 theories, one from the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like physical evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories briefly go as follows.
1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.
2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.
3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.
4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin) -AKA 911 was in inside Job.
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil. (a problem with this theory is its vagueness. People in this camp will call for an independent investigation. That's not going to happen and I think there are enough facts available for us to do our own research. [Which I have done]) Another problem with this group is their associations with other irrelevant cult like propositions that do nothing but discredit the rest of it. This will be discussed at the end of this document.
The "911 was an inside job camps" then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario
5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC's papers were first written, and the same foreign nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.
The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here. <- I highly recommend seeing that link after you finish reading this. This timeline may help beginners as well.
911 was the Mossad. But that is not an Israeli intelligence agency per say it is a terrorist agency for the military industrial complex which feeds off of the hatred of the bigots and useful idiots concentrated in Israel. The US and Israel are not really different countries in a way. The US and Israeli agencies and their Neocon governments work for their own interests and those interests are guided by a racist, political ideology mixed up with a fascist version of a religion and Straussian philosophy. There is a total disconnect between the people of America (the sane ones) and the government. US foreign policy works for Likud Israeli interests first second and third. This is because the Zionists and MIC have overlapping financial interests. But most of all the press is Zionist. There is no war greater right now than the information war. Nothing would fix things faster than taking back the media or totally discrediting the corrupt lying fear mongering war cheerleaders we have now.
A lot of people have written about and shown the problems with official 911 story. There is the demolition of building number 7, there are the firemen's reports that the fires were almost out, there are numerous reports of secondary explosions etc. Because it has been said on radio and more so because people have made films about it, many people can recite the arguments for the inside job in their sleep. Fire burns buildings; it does not burn on the top of one for an hour or so and then blow it up in a matter of ten seconds, completely destroying everything including the foundations and leaving molten steal in the basements weeks after the event. It is physically impossible.
But what has been hidden from you and the dots which have not been connected in any 911 films is the Israeli connection. 911 has been hit with heavy disinformation. This tactic worked well for Area 51 a secretive base that was wasting trillions of dollars. Because of disinformation and a lot of idiots, if anyone said a thing about area 51 it was unfairly linked to everything from space creatures to crop circles. Currently in 911 "truth" there is disinfo spanning from Bavarian death cults, to a black pope, to lasers from outer space. Do not associate any of that nonsense with what I am saying.
911 was an inside job which was part of a larger plan for perpetual war hatched in Israel. Understand that Israel is not Jewish people OK please get that through your warped heads. Israel is a violent nation that engages in false flag operations routinely and serves the interests of the MIC not any particular ethnicity. For a long time during the Cold War, Israel was the medium the MIC used to bully the Middle East indirectly and increase arms sales across the board. 911 and the recent wars in the Middle East were carefully planned attacks carried out by a faction of Zionist Neocons and the Israeli Mossad. The policy papers that acted as propaganda for the war were written by Dual Citizens with Israel. The equity firms profiting from the Iraq War like Carlyle and Trireme and the law firms processing contracts like Feith and Zell, the Anthrax attack, and the anthrax attack speech, the PNAC documents, the DPG the lies from journalists about Iraq's WMD are all connected back to the same Zionist cabal in the DOD and office of the vice president. Just think back to the propaganda about Iraq before the war and then go read what PNAC was writing in the 90s.
On top of that the Niger forgeries, which are Clear concrete proof to show that these men were consciously lying, have still not been reported in the Main Stream media. There is no surprise there, they can't even admit that Israel has Nukes, or any information about multiple spy-rings Spies (Pollard, Art Students, AIPAC, ADL, too many to even name. ) The Niger-gate scandal as well as (the mini-AIPAC) the ATC's dealings with the MIC were covered up by Lewis Libby leaking information about a BJA CIA agent to the press. He leaked it to exactly the same warmongering trash journalists who had been lying about WMD in Iraq from the start.
Also it was the INC and Chalabi who served as "sources" for these yellow journalists who lied about WMDs. The INC and Chalabi were suggested as replacements to Saddam as far back as the mid 90s by none other than Wolfowitz and Libby. Further more AIPAC the largest Israeli lobby was caught red handed (Rosen & Weissman) spying on the US about Iraq and Iran through moles (Larry Franklin, Gilon) inside the very same offices that were meeting with Israeli generals. (Feith and Perle). Not only was the lobby caught spying but a Zionist lobbyist (Jack Abramoff) was busted bribing congress. [and possibly blackmailing them]. Then in a story that was pulled from FOX News, there was another separate massive Israeli spy ring that had agents living next door to the said hijackers of 911. (Israeli Art students) and on top of that the Mossad with its front (Urban Moving systems) was busted filming 911 and cheering.
The 911 commission was comprised of John Lehman a PNAC member, Fred Feilding Bush's current Lawyer who is also a lawyer for Blackwater, James R. Thompson a Hollinger BOD member with Perle and Kissinger, and other dubious characters. They did not even address the collapse of Building 7 which the BBC reported fell before it had even fallen. The DoD and the Military industrial complex are not separate they are one in the same.
The 911 investigation was a farce it was on a Scooby Doo level for a detective story. Oh look we magically found a passport of a lead hijacker the same one who we will later lie about (a week later) and connect with Saddam by using a fabricated story claiming that he met an anonymous Iraqi in Prague. Here the war party was lying about Iraq and lying about 911.
Much of the 911 cover up which the MSM just repeated was done by Popular Mechanics a magazine whose editor was B. Chertoff, Michael Chertoff's cousin. Michael Chertoff of course was the author of the pre-written Patriot Act quickly who became the head of Joe Lieberman and Arlen Spector's new creation the department of Homeland security. Note that the Patriot Act was passed while congress was under the duress of anthrax attacks which turned out to be from a Jewish American Zionist and the speech that Colin Powell read to the UN was written by Lewis Libby. Were it not for this attack the Act as well as the Department of Homeland Security may not have passed, at least not so quickly. They already had these documents previously written before 911 just waiting for it to happen. Also the US was alreadyin place to invade Afghanistan before 911 happened.
Central banks with the MIC are controlling the show right now. They're the current cash cow to feed off of Zionism. The Defense department is a corporation, one that was missing trillions of dollars and admitted this the day before 911. The secretary for Policy (Richard Perle, Trireme inc, Hollinger, Boeing) The Army Secretary (Thomas White Enron) The Navy Secretary (Gordon England General Dynamics) The Air force secretary (James Roche Northrop Grumman) all acted in their own personal interests. The Office of Special Plans' Douglas Feith and Paul Wolfowitz were also Northrop Grumman employees. To better understand how the MIC works See this The USSA a quick look at how the US kills for commercial interests and does not practice the free market principles it pretends to profess. two places at once like Mohamed Atta who was also spotted on9the now convicted Zionist lobbyist) Jack Abramoff's casino ships. The hijackers just so happen to live next door to an uncovered Israeli spy ring. The flight schools were a false trail easily gobbled up by the left to show incompotence while at the same time reinforcing the idea that there were Muslim hijackers. The said hijackers myth falls apart when 20% of them turn up to STILL BE ALIVE. So if there were no hijackers then the official story is false and then that means the flight school information was also disinformation created to frame patsies and given that Israelis lived next door/with to these agents who were making as much noise as possible and went as far as leaving behind a list with their names on it to be found, means they were actually Mossad. Then seperate Mossad agents get caught on 911 and the information connecting them is classified and the criminals simply deported back to Israel.
Obviously since many of the hijackers are still alive there is no way they could have crashed planes into building or have gone to these flight schools. Israeli Mossad was setting them up with stolen passports, as we will go over.
This is not some illuminati, it is not the Catholic Church, there was no missile hitting the pentagon, it is not Jews in general or America in general, it is not just "THE government," it is definitely not lasers from space or human morphing lizards. That kind of outright crap is the same kind of discrediting disinfo that was leaked out to mask Area 51 a real formerly secret military base that spent trillions on new toys for the military but was covered up by nonsense about UFOs and aliens with big eyes that were featured on unsolved mysteries and now can be found on T-shirts.
911 was a classic false flag operation by the country which can do no wrong in the eyes of the media and would have nothing to fear from the press or an investigation because they have already been getting away with brutal murder for 38 years while sucking billions of dollars from the US the whole time. [even after attacking a US ship.] The greater story here is how the Israel can be busted murdering Americans in an attack that if you look at the details was irrefutably deliberate and planned, and yet the Main Stream Media made hardly any mention of it other than back pages on a few news papers. And even after 40 years of the survivors telling their stories and making it painfully obvious what happened the Media has refused to report it and there are no investigations. This is why they could lie about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq without worry when they knew it would sooner or later be dscovered false. They have no need to worry or explain anything (like the demolition of building 7) because they know the press will ignore it and even excuse it. So the story here is not just that Israel can murder people in an attempted false flag, it is that the US media can, has, and will, cover it up. This is because the false flag was set up jointly between a faction in the US (that included LBJ...long story see my All Roads JFK paper) and Israel. Only the Israelis failed to sink a sitting duck before a message got out to the seventh fleet and the operation was blown so they had to go to plan B.. Plan be was to just shamelessly lie and deny all evidence contrary to their claims like a religious zealot immune to all reason and factual evidence. It worked then and it is working now. However because of the web that barrier is starting to crack and we are pushing back in the info war.
Israel was behind 911 and the war in Iraq (though that overlaps with oil interests and many other things) the cabal made it happen. The X-communist Trotskyite Neocon dual citizen Zionists are the driving force behind a war with Iran and Syria. PNAC's Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD) which mentioned the need for a new Pearl Harbor like attack, was based on the Israel Clean Break paper written by Richard Perle. RAD although signed by partially composed by many Neocons was primarily written by Lewis Libby the lawyer for the Mossad Agent Marc Rich who was involved in Iran Contra and the "privatization" of Russia, a regular mafia thug who got a pardon from Bill Clinton. Also in Iran Contra was Elliot Abrams who got a pardon from Bush's father. [To know more about what really happend in Russia with Gaidar and the Oligarch go read my paper or listen to my audio file here Quick history of Russia school wouldn't teach you and to learn more about Marc Rich just click on his name and read/listen to my file on him.
The players behind what went down are not secret, they do everything openly. It is almost like they want to be caught as if they are bragging about it. If people can ignore the disinfo and focus on real people which we have plenty of actual documentation for being behind 911 and the following wars, then we can expose these crooks and let the consequences fall on them however they may.
So who did it? To answer this question one should first ask, "who had the power to cover it up?" Who would have the power to censor the media and have total confidence that they could censor the media given an event this size? One look at the non-coverage of Israel's illegal occupation of Palestine should give you one answer. Nowhere, in the US televised media, do they even mention that there is an occupation. This massive conflict, which one would assume would be impossible to conceal, is totally shielded from the American public. The Occupation is missing from the news and they purposely paint the distorted picture that Israel just defends itself from crazy suicide bombers. This is not something they can hide, or even debate about, the occupation is visible, you can go visit it, and it is widely covered in media outside the US, but you will never ever hear Israel's crimes even mentioned. There is no news of the Jewish-Only racial colonies that the US calls "Settlements" and "Neighborhoods" reported on Fox, ABCNNBCBS which is really one net work that tells the same stories often in the same order. I will explain why in the media section.
Also there has been no reporting on the second Israeli spy-ring, none, zero, and the first spy ring uncovered was yanked from Fox News.
Even though it is an open secret to the rest of the world, in the US there has been no mention of Israel's secretly built nuclear weapons. The list goes on... the faction that has nothing to fear from the US media and who could cover up something as huge as 911 or larger are the Zionists of Israel and their allies in the US government and press who all profit through the MIC and investments from fringe element religious organizations who are rewarded with air-time.
One should also look at the list of congressmen on the AIPAC lobby's "payroll" and then look at the astonishing number who we know had connections the Zionist lobbyist and criminal Jack Abramoff. (who is deeply connected to the Israeli Mossad and 911 as I will show you later).
The second question one should ask, is 'what did 911 serve'? The answer to that is very simple. The aftermath of 911 led to two different wars, and we all know how 911 was falsely attached to the justifications for America's wars. Almost 90% of US troops in Iraq (in 2006) think that Saddam had a role in 911 and that the war was revenge for it. That level of total ignorance is mind-blowing. War, of course, is good for select businesses and central banks because wars are debt generators. Iraq was not a threat to the US. They were a threat to Israel, and the same case can be said about Iran. We know who really wants these wars.
There can be no doubt that the press consciously distorted information leading up to the wars, and that they never made any clear pronouncements about how they had been wrong about their lies, with the Weapons of Mass Destruction myth being a clear stinging example. There are people in the US who still believe that Iraq had WMDs or that they moved them to Syria lol. If you want to know who planned 911 then a good place to look would be who do we know planned and then lied about Iraq? (also who has been lying the most about Iran) Who championed the disinformation? Where were the lies coming from? And when was this war really planned and where? The answered to all of those questions are sadly the same. Israel and American Zionists. And that is a fact we can prove.
If you want to know who the Neocons are that orchestrated 911 then you should look at some of their other messes. We will start with PNAC (Project for a New merican Century) and then work backwards from the War in Iraq to 911. It is always important to look at what happened both before an after an event when you are investigating it. The myths told by the media prior to the war in Iraq had been written out in PNAC papers form the 1990s
Iraq War Planned Long Before 911
As soon as puppet Bush got into office, his handlers went to work actualizing their long pushed-for plans for Iraq.
I pointed out in my book that Bush and Blair bombed Baghdad 27 days after Bush was sworn into office. This was well before 911 and had nothing to do with “stopping terrorism.”
Iraq had nothing to do with 911.
Many of us already know who had been calling for war with Iraq - and who had written the rhetoric about WMD etc. Every pre-war lie was a PNAC talking point. All of it was written in PNAC papers in the 90s by the same authors who peddled their lies to the media during the run up to the war. These same people made up the Israeli cabal that wrote a IASPS paper [an Israeli group] called the Afghan Vortex, which called for war in Afghanistan as well as the need for a “new Pearl Harbor. “
I wrote about this earlier, here. It is worth reposting.
Want to know why I drive the point home that the PNAC and the war in Iraq came from the same cabal? Let’s just look back at some of their policy papers. These quotes are in their own words, from their own website.
These authors, who wrote Israeli policy papers stating the same things, wrote exactly what became the pre-invasion script to Iraq.
1) The PNAC letter to President Clinton in 1998
“The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.”
“Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.”-1998 Abrams and Perle.
Is that not verbatim what was used as propaganda in 2002-3 for the pretext to invade Iraq? They even used the same catch phrases: “weapons of mass destruction” and “avoiding inspectors,” which were lies. However, the Israelis were unable to get their war until they could also attach the myth of Saddam’s men meeting with Al Qaeda. William Safire, who received a Guardian of Zion award, wrote this up and then Cheney and Rice (etc) repeated it on TV over and over again.
2)From the PNAC paper, “How to attack Iraq”
“CIA director George Tenet said last January that Iraq already had the “technological expertise” to produce biological weapons “in a matter of weeks.” (lie) And according to former U. N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter, Saddam needs only six months without inspectors looking over his shoulder to build those weapons and deploy them on missiles capable of reaching Israel and other targets in the Middle East."
Yes, Saddam had missiles that could reach Israel. Israel also had missiles that can reach Iraq. The inspectors were removed after they were caught doubling as spies for the US and that is a fact that Scott Ritter pointed out on CNN crossfire back in 2003.
3) Paul Wolfowitz made a Statement before the US House National Security Committee It calls for war with Iraq. He also wrote this letter (1999) claiming that the bloodlust for Iraq was not partisan because a couple of democrats (you might recognize them) Joe Lieberman and John Kerry also agreed with their position. Wow that IS interesting a Vice presidential and a presidential hopeful just so happen to be those two Democrats. Well Wolfowizt was right about something. It was not partisan because both parties are one party on foreign affairs and both parties wanted war. It is still that way.
4) Saddam's Impending Victory -1998 -Robert Kagan
This one goes compared Saddam to Hitler and talks about weapons of mass destruction saying the lid is about to come off and calls Saddam's palaces the "so-called presidential palaces--" Doesn't that sound familar? It is the same lie that we got later from Judith Miller (Dec 20th 2001 NYT) who said she learned of secret WMD labs hidden under the presidential palaces from "an Iraqi defector" later in the INC to be. That is about as accurate of reporting as when Fox wants to insert their own rhetoric and quotes as a "source" their infamous line of "Some people say".
"For Saddam, whose conventional military strength had been decimated in 1991 and could not be restored for many years, weapons of mass destruction provided the quickest, surest, and indeed, the only route back to strategic dominance in the Middle East. As Rolf Ekeus, the former head of UNSCOM, the U.N.’s weapons-monitoring operation, said last year, weapons of mass destruction “make the difference between Iraq’s being a regional power and a major international power.” Finding and destroying Saddam’s ability to produce weapons of mass destruction, therefore, was an essential part of guaranteeing that Saddam could not again threaten neighboring states. The U.N. effort to rid Iraq of such weapons capabilities was supposed to put the lid on Saddam’s grand strategic ambitions. Today the lid is about to come off. Saddam Hussein, weak, isolated, and impoverished as he is, has decided to take his big gamble. The crisis he set off last October when he blocked U.N. inspectors came to a head last week when Iraqi deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz told UNSCOM chief Richard Butler that a number of sites in Iraq—the so-called presidential palaces—would remain off-limits for two more months at least. Saddam Hussein also issued an ultimatum last week calling for the U.N. to wrap up its inspections by May and lift the sanctions."
5) Speaking of Iraq The Neocon Robert Kagan wrote an op-ed in the Washington Times. You can read this on your own time. It basically staes how certain they are of Saddam producing Weapons of Mass Destruction. Bla bla bla same old song and dance that you heard in 2002-3 just before the war.
6) From the PNAC paper, “Bombing Iraq Isn’t Enough.“
“Saddam Hussein must go. This imperative may seem too simple for some experts and too daunting for the Clinton Administration. But if the United States is committed, as the President said in his State of the Union Message, to insuring that the Iraqi leader never again uses weapons of mass destruction, the only way to achieve that goal is to remove Mr. Hussein and his regime from power. Any policy short of that will fail.”
“Mr. Hussein has obviously thought through this scenario, and he likes his chances. That is why he provoked the present crisis, fully aware that it could lead to American bombing strikes. He has survived them before, and he is confident he can survive them again. They will not succeed in forcing him to abandon his efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction. The only way to remove the threat of those weapons is to remove him, and that means using air power and ground forces, and finishing the task left undone in 1991?
Anyone who cannot see that the Iraq war was carried out and planned by this cabal of dual citizen Israelis must be a fool. They wrote verbatim the pre-war hype five years before the war. These same people later faked the evidence and used their moles in the media to repeat the garbage they’d already been writing in the PNAC. However, until born-again Zionist Christian Bush, no one was stupid enough to listen.
All these “let’s bomb Iraq” papers came from as early as 1998.
6) This one was written on July 30 of 2001, just a month and 12 days before 9/11. It has a big fat picture of Usama Bin Laden on it (they were propping up that patsy early).
“For Bin Laden’s “sleepers”—agents already outside of Afghanistan awaiting the right moment to strike an American target—the situation is probably little better.”
The lies about Iraq and 911 are all inside PNAC papers. The authors are the same people who created and covered up the Niger forgeries. They were involved in an Israeli spy scandal (which STILL has not seen a trial) and at least two of them (John Lehman and James Thompson) were on the 911 commission!
This same lying Israeli cabal was behind the PNAC papers, as well as the lies about Iraq and 911 (when the Mossad was caught filming the towers and living next door to said hijackers). Over 200 Israeli spies were busted in the largest spy ring ever to be carried out on American soil. After 911, Israel was caught spying on the US again - through a Department of Defense (DOD) employee who worked out of an office that met with Israeli generals and was run by Douglas Feith. Feith is a war profiteer whose company, Feith & Zell is partners with Israeli Settler Marc Zell. This law firm got to delegate reconstruction projects in Iraq.
5) This one takes the cake though. It came from Wolfowitz, the Kagans, Lewis Libby, who at that time was with Dechert Price & Rhoads. (pgs 63 and 79 are especially relevant)
Update: Adam Pearlman (”Al Qaeda” spokesman who faked Bin Laden Tapes) is the grandson of Carl Pearlman, who is on the Board of Directors for the Anti Defamation League (a Zionist organization with spies in the US who also support Apartheid states).
For those who need to SEE the lies about WMD that the mainstream media and Neocons repeated over and over (which the PNAC wrote the script for), please watch this video:
These lies were told by embedded Zionist journalists who worked with the Administration's PNAC members. For example the lie that the lead hijacker in 911 Mohamed repeated by Willaim Safire of the New York Times (May 9, 2002) came from Gary Schmitt who wrote it in 2001 (for PNAC in the Weekly Standard run by William Kristol the chairman of PNAC). The story was leaked to Reuters on September 18, 2001 just seven days after the attacks. Wow they knew about the lead hijacker as well as a meeting that never took place all within seven days. Reminds me of the BBC report on Iraq that was plegerized from a college student in Florida. This Atta meet with Iraqi officilas lie was repeated by Dick Cheney on national television Dec 9th 2001. He later denied this despite being on tape saying it.
copied from Gary Schmitt (who wrote it in 2001 with PNAC). Interestingly this story was Reuters news service on September 18, 2001 just seven days after the attck of September 11th. Reuters claims it came from. [/url]By the way he also calls the Czech Republic by the old name of Czechslovokia. I can't believe he is the Vice President. Anyway one would think if they had a report (that they read) out of a country that they would at least know the correct name of that country. He didn't. Bush is still more embarrassing though.
Schmitt wrote "SHORTLY BEFORE getting on aplane to fly to New Jersey from Europe in June 2000, Mohamed Atta, the lead hijacker of the first jet airliner to slam into the World Trade Center and, apparently, the lead conspirator in the attacks of September 11, met with a senior Iraqi intelligence official. This was no chance encounter. Rather than take a flight from Germany, where he had been living, Atta traveled to Prague, almost certainly for the purpose of meeting there with Iraqi intelligence operativeAhmed Samir Ahani."source
Essentially this was a complete lie designed to connect Iraq to Al Qaeda and the 911 attacks. It was false, yet all the networks ABCNNBCBS FOX repeated it anyway because it had been in the NY Times. The source for the Times "reporters" were members of the INC (Iraqi Nation Congress) such as Chalabi a man convicted of bank fruad and the person who Wolfowitz had suggested should lead the INC back in the 1990s when he wrote to then President Clinton about regime change. William Safire who made the bogus report was awarded a Guardian of Zion award in 2005 for his defense of Zionism and Israel. He also got a presidential medal of Freedom from Bush in 2006. It's their way of saying good job. What the Neocons were doing is planting stories from known false sources on willing journalists and then quoting them as sources for what was in reality their own lies to begin with. The triangle was the OSP told INC what to say and then the journalist claimed them as sources and then the pentagon quoted the journalists.
Also working with William Safire at the New York Times was Judith Miller. She made up the lies about aluminum tubes (which physically would not even work anyway) being used as centrafuses in Iraq's alleged nuclear program. She was also the journalist that spread the story about Saddam having weapons of mass destruction hidden under his palaces or in mobile trucks. Lewis Libby who I will talk about in a bit, also promoted the mobile weapons labs myth as well as the myths about Iraq's Anthrax.
It turns out they didn't have any. Libby wrote the Anthrax speech that Collin Powel read like a sucker to the UN. Every claim was false. This was also an attempt to link 911 to Iraq by claiming that the anthrax attacks that followed 911 may have come from Iraq. They did not. They actually came from Dr. Philip Zack who the FBI has on tape stealing anthrax from a lab in Fort Detrick MD which he had been fired from for his racist antics to an Egyptian employee who he had tried to frame. Judith Miller it would be revealed was also one of the journalists who Libby leaked the name of Valerie Plame to in order to blow the cover of the CIA agent as well as her entire team using the front company of Brewster Jennings & Associates. The reason for that as I will get into later was to cover up more lies and fabrications about yellowcake uranium coming from Niger as well as massive profiteering by the ATC a MIC lobby involving all these same players.
PNAC'S co-founders are William Kristol and Robert Kagan.(CFR) Now Kagan is the most active writer in PNAC. He and both his brothers were part of the team that compiled the modern Mein Kampf Rebuilding America's defenses... Kagan writes for Kristol's Weekly Standard and cranked out more propaganda than anyone. The majority of the let's Bomb Iraq rhetoric from PNAC which was identical to the pre-invasion excuses (lies) that Zionists in the media later used in it's pre-invasion blitz, was written by Robert Kagan. Here is a guy who wrote speeches for George P. Shultz the former Secretary of State who was part of the attempted cover up of Iran Contra. Shultz also worked for LBJ. He is the former President of Bechtel. Bechtel is second only to Haliburton KBR in terms of war profiteering contracts. Shultz is still currently a board member of both Bechtel and its subsidiarity Fremont (formerly called Bechtel Investments). And you know who has tens of millions invested in Fremont? The Bin Laden Family.
Back to Kagan. Kagan is a member of the Aspen Institute. (Something Libby wrote to jailed Judith Miller about in code. Remember the leaves turning out West in Aspen bit) Now the Aspen Institute was founded by Walter Paepcke and his nephew William Nitze is currently a Chair and on the Board of Trustees for the Aspen Institute. William Nitze is the son of Paul Nitze who used to be the Secretary of the Navy from 63-67 and then Assistant Secretary of Defense. He pushed for an infamous bit of foreign policy called Operation Northwoods! This was a plan to crash drone airplanes supposedly full of Americans into buildings and blame it on Cuba.
So this nut's son on the board of trustees and serves as a Chair for the Aspen Institute which his uncle founded and the co-founder of the Project for a New American Century, which also promoted false flags propaganda, and the principle writer of the lies that we know were regurgitated by the press to start a war with Iraq, is also a member. And Kagan is not the only one at Aspen either. Remember that it was Kagan, Libby, and Wolfowitz who compiled the PNAC paper which spoke of the need for a New Pearl Harbor and outlined a plan of Straussian imperialism where the ends justify the means. Do you want to know how deep the rabbit hole goes?
The Aspen Institute has something it calls the "Round Table" bastradizing the term from the fairytales, the Roundtable reads like a whose who of Neocons, Lynne Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle etc... Perle (the Prince of Darkness) was the Defense Dapartment's chairman of the DPB Defense Policy Board which obviously advocated war with Iraq. Serving with Perle on the DPG was fellow PNAC member Christopher Williams who is also a member of the Aspen Institute with Kagan.
On the Board of Trustees with Nitze is Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, as well as Michael Powell the former FCC director and son of former Secretary of state and mouth piece for Libby Colin Powell. Most notably on the BOT is Billionaire Michael Eisner who at the time of the Iraq war was the CEO of Disney which owns ABC. On Disney's board of directors sits John E. Bryson who also happens to be on the board of directors of Boeing which invested $20 billion into Richard Perle's equity firm. Boeing then is offered a deal worth $30 billion (May 2003) to supply the empire with 100 military tanker plane. The deal was approved by Pete Aldrige Jr on his very last day in office as the Chief weapons buyer at the pentagon. On top of that Perle's Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee consisted an MIC check list with ultra Neocons like Herny Kissinger and Kagan's and Betchel's good buddy George P. Shultz as well as yet another Aspen Institute Strategy group member Eliot Cohen. Cohen, a professor and director at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University. Guess who they named that after.... Paul Nitze, the Northwoods man. Sick isn't. Oh there is a lot more but it's just over kill.
I can talk till I am blue in the face but it doesn't matter. We got people too interested in chasing down some Illuminati Jesuit masonic weather controlling German death cult to pay attention to facts we can prove and real people with names and positions we can deal with. I know there are certain people that want to make money and sell Armageddons hype Orwellian videos but I just don't see the point in the sensationalism, it is bad enough how it really is. 911 was an Israeli false flag and the Iraq war was a Zionist/MIC sell that used 911 as a launching pad. I mean the same psychos who wrote about false flags in the past and each pre-war lies were the ones selling the war and who were on the 911 commission.
How one could make a film about 911 and not say anything about Israel is beyond me. One would have to intentionally avoid it. Some 911 films have even been misleading, mentioning PNAC without telling the origins and then dropping some big names like Cheney and Rumsfeld who actually didn't write one word of any of the PNAC papers. But I will leave that for the disinformation section. Don't get me wrong, those two guys are the scum of the earth, but let's be clear on who did what. Cheney had a central role in abetting the Mossad by personally having the authority to command NORAD moved to his position prior to 911, so that he could personally make NORAD stand down and assure that the planes hit their targets. And yes a plane DID hit the pentagon. I don't want to argue here about that or get accused of dividing the movement, but you can see that here. This really should not be where our focus is as we already have much stronger evidence about the WTC towers. There is no motive to use a missile, why not just drop the plane? And before you say pilots could not make that kind of flight, they ceertainly could, it doesn't take great skill to crash a plane also they could have been flown by remote control via ultra Zionist Dov S. Zakheim. (another PNAC founder).
A lot of people know a little about PNAC, but very few people have taken a hard look at its origins. PNAC was a spin off from the American Enterprise Institute, and 100% of the members are Zionists. People have also gotten confused between the actual authors and people who just signed their letters. Rumsfeld for example is not part of the special in-group as its chairman William Kristol revealed, ironically on the Colbert report. PNAC was co-authored by the same people who have been caught lying about the Iraq War's pre-invasion intelligence. We are talking about only around 38 people who helped fabricate evidence and pass it off to the president and journalists (and in some cases fake journalists like Gannon). PNAC's ideas and statements stem from Israeli policy papers. And PNAC's papers are comprised by Israeli citizens who are connected to every major Zionists group on earth. Paul Craig Roberts: Agrees with me about Israel. As do many others now. http://www.ancreport.com/forum/mp3/clips_0003.wma[url] In fact, PNAC's papers were written b ... =4246]same people who wrote Israeli policy papers and hold dual citizenship with Israel. The war in Iraq and control over energy resources ect is all lined out in Israel's A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" which was written by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. That is just one of many papers this little blood for money cabal cranked out. The IASPS (Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Science) also wrote a paper called the Afghan Vortex a year before the invasion. Note also that the US had troops already in place set to invade Afghanistan before 911.
One principle PNAC author was Paul Wolofawitz. In 1992 Paul Wolfowitz wrote the Defense Planning Guidance, with his former Student Lewis Libby:
The foreign strategy of the US must be "unapologetic, idealistic, assertive and well funded. America must not only be the world's policeman or its sheriff, it must be its beacon and guide Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union, and Southwest Asia There are three additional aspects to this objective: First the U.S must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. Second, in the non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role."
Paul Wolfowitz (a dual citizen with Israel who has a sister living there) is now the retired head of the World Bank, (appointed by Bush) was formerly the Director of Policy Planning in the Defense Department. Like Perle, he was also a "Scoop" Jackson Democrat and worked for Jackson in the 70s. Paul is CFR, a Bilderberg member, part of the Trilateral Commission and the American Enterprise Institute (the parent of PNAC) Paul was a principle PNAC author and he openly admitted in Vanity Fair magazine that they settled on WMD as the excuse to use to get a war with Iraq.
-May 2003 Vanity FairFor bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on
"we" Settled on WMDs.... who is "we could it be the Zionist cabal that had been writing about the desire for a war with Iraq and who set up the OSP? he is also admitting that they were just inventing reasons for war to present to the public.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction claim is important because it was the legal reason for the invasion. If they were complying with UN resolution 1441 then the US did not have grounds to invade. please go here and listen to my Feb 10th radio interview which outlines more background on that as well as the sanctions which helped starve half a million people. Allow that statistic to sink in. 500,000 people mostly children starved to death. Can you comprehend the horror of that? It gets worse, but that is an extra tangent for now.
Paul Wolfowitz presented an open letter to Bill Clinton on January 26, 1998 where the opening lines clearly state the desire to go to war with Iraq. "Wolfowitz urged Clinton to recognize a provisional [Iraqi] government headed by the Iraqi National Congress under Chalabi." Wow sound familiar? This would is what would later become PNAC's doctrine and US foreign policy.
Later in 2000 PNAC released what is normally referred to as the document more of you are familiar with which is commonly but mistakenly just called "PNAC" and that was PNAC's magnum opus, the paper, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces and Resources for a New Century" This is the paper stating the infamous lines about the need for a New Pearl Harbor. The bulk of the document however is about going to war with Iraq. It reiterates what this same dirty cabal had written for Israel's Prime Minister (1996) Benjamin Netanyahu.
When Israeli intelligence on Iraq had been rejected by the CIA Wolfowitz created his own "Team B" to go over it and work scientifically backwards, that is they started with a conclusion and then set out to prove it by any means possible including just lying. Wolfowitz did not do this on his own, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith and Richard Perle and others who have recently resigned and or are or have been caught up in criminal activity in the past, all took part. Please see the real list of PNAC's authors
Interestingly, Ricahrd Perle and Wolfowitz both worked as aides to senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson. In 1970 while working for Jackson (A Democrat!) Perle was charged with two heinous acts, spying for the state of Israel and leaking information about the CIA in regards to its nuclear deterrent program, to Russia. Now keep that in mind because it is very important. It's the very same things that have happening with AIPAC and the Plame Affair from under Perle and Feith's offices. Perle is even part of the tax-exempt Henry Jackson Society. He is a trustee for the UACC (U.S.-Azerbaijin Chamber of Commerce) which worked with Blackwater to get troops in to Azerbaijan using the loop hole that they were not troops but "body guards."
Boieng invested 20 Million in Trireme run by Richard Perle which was apporoved by Aldridge on his last day at the pentagon just before he took a job with Lockheed Martain. Jermy Scahill wrote:
Perle is the nastiest of the nasty. In my mind he is The worst Neocon of them all. He has appropriately earned the nickname "The Prince of Darkness." Perle along with Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, (all three of them got jobs in the US defense department, Perle and Fieth have had to resign) authored the Israel's "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.""The contract was approved by President Bush's cheif weapons buyer at the Pentagon, Edward C. "Pete" Aldridge Jr., who just happened to be the former president of McDonnell Douglas Electronic Systems which later became part of Boeing. Alderidge approved the deal on his last day at the Pentagon before taking a job with weapons manufacture Lockheed Martain. The deal would go down "as the most significant defense procurement mismanagement in contemporary history," in the words of Senate Armed Service Committee Chair John Warner, resulting in a cancellation of the contract, amid widespread allegations of cronyism. Former Air Force procurement officer Darleen Druyun went to prison as did a Boeing representative, while Air Force Secratary James Roche resigned."-p317 Blackwater The Rise of the World's Most powerful Mercenary Army.
-Israel's A Clean Break:A New Strategy for Securing the Realm by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. (under the heading "Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy")Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions.
The Trireme firm which has tens of millions dollars worth of investments from Boeing a smentioned above. Boeing's board of directors comprises people like John Biggs, John E. Bryson, Linda Z. Cook, and William M. Daley who also sit on the BOD of major banks and mass media conglomerates. For more on that mess see 
