Republican presidential debate - UK Guardian article

Current events, politics, and more.
Post Reply
Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Republican presidential debate - UK Guardian article

Post by Ed » Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:43 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international ... 13,00.html
read this article and look at what it says about the candidates and read what it says for Ron Paul. pretty horrible sum up of Ron Paul and the debate.
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Post by Ed » Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:56 pm

what they should have written about him
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6725393.stm
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

User avatar
Gixxer
Revolutionary Party
Revolutionary Party
Posts: 502
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 10:12 pm
Location: USA

Post by Gixxer » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:07 am

Barely even a Republican except in name, this congressman has a loyal band of internet fans. Supports various crazy ideas, like abolishing tax. Got smacked around by Giuliani last time.

He's a very inconsistent libertarian


WTF? who writes this shit? even more who believes it?

IrrigatedPancake
Revolutionary Party
Revolutionary Party
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:48 pm

Post by IrrigatedPancake » Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:00 am

He reconsidered RP later in the debate.
Richard Adams wrote:Ron Paul says that the principle of "pre-emptive war" is most pressing moral issue, and says it's shocking that other candidates won't even deny the possibility of using nukes against Iran - "a country that has done no harm to us". You know, I'm beginning to warm to crazy Ron. Not so crazy?
[/quote]
Image

User avatar
Liszt
King Cnut
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:31 am
Contact:

Post by Liszt » Fri Nov 02, 2007 4:36 am

i read the Guardian for about 10 years. In 2003 they published a piece on an organisation I happened to know, and I wrote to them pointing out their "mistakes". For 6 months, I had phone calls that hung up, my email was hacked, my post opened and I even had a hacker moving my mouse around the screen once. And i was followed from an anti war meeting (the cunt ran away when I approached him) I stopped reading it after that. It is supposed to be a "quality" paper, but in reality, it´s just a bunch of cunts.

Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Post by Ed » Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:58 am

yeah well i never just accept one paper to be 'quality', the style of writing might be better than some but that does not mean the content is quality.
i
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Post by Iconoclast » Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:02 pm

Liszt wrote:i read the Guardian for about 10 years. In 2003 they published a piece on an organisation I happened to know, and I wrote to them pointing out their "mistakes". For 6 months, I had phone calls that hung up, my email was hacked, my post opened and I even had a hacker moving my mouse around the screen once. And i was followed from an anti war meeting (the cunt ran away when I approached him) I stopped reading it after that. It is supposed to be a "quality" paper, but in reality, it´s just a bunch of cunts.
You were trojaned and they installed a VNC server on your computer. Just a heads up; run a virus scan.
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

Post Reply