OpEdNews
Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne ... _santo.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 8, 2007
Red Alert: Has Santorum Let the Cat Out of the Bag?
By Mac McKinney
A very disturbing article has just surfaced by Paul Joseph Watson of Prison Planet about comments ex-Senator Rick Santorum made very recently on the Hugh Hewitt radio show. I quote you:
“In an alarming display of fearmongering, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum has suggested that a series of ‘unfortunate events,’ namely terrorist attacks, will occur within the next year and change American citizen's perception of the war.
“Santorum went on to clearly imply that terror attacks will occur inside America which will alter the body politic and lead to a reversal of the anti-war sentiment now dominating the country.” (http://www.propagandamatrix.com/article ... geview.htm )
For those of us who have carefully studied events prior to and leading up to 9/11, this sets off giant alarm bells, because there were inadvertent tip-offs about that “unfortunate event” as well. In fact Watson reported about one of them in an earlier article:
“Hollywood director, producer and documentary film maker Aaron Russo, currently receiving a wave of plaudits for his latest release, America: From Freedom to Fascism, told The Alex Jones Show that Nicholas Rockefeller had personally assured him there was going to be an ‘event’ that would trigger the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq eleven months before 9/11 took place.” (http://www.proxyowl.net/cgi-bin/cgiprox ... r_911.html)
Ex-Senator Santorum is doing one of two things, or both, in the following article. He is either fear-mongering and/or accidentally letting the cat out of the bag about new BLACK OPS terrorist attacks being planned right now to continue to enable, drive and justify the Neocon/Republican, home-grown Fourth Reich. This is almost inevitable along the pathway of negativity, to continuously reinforce fear and terror with more fear and terror. So be aware, aware, aware that more terrorist (read U.S. State-Sponsored Terror) attacks may be in the works this year and next, not at the hands of Osama bin Laden, who is quite likely dead anyway, but at the hands of our own murderous government. The Fascist elitists are losing control of our minds en masse, so they need to replay the 9/11-Reichstag Fire card all over again.
We do not, unfortunately, have the luxury of waiting to see if Santorum is blowing smoke out his rear. We have to assume the worst, because too much is at stake. Consequently we have to continue to educate and inform the public, near and far, about False Flag Ops in general, 9/11 Lies in particular, and the ongoing Neocon/Fourth Reich strategy to maintain their hideous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, extend their theatres of war into Iran and Syria, continue to tighten the strategic noose around Russia, and increase repression and control of the American people (not to mention the British and others). So if another 9/11-style mass crime (or crimes) does occur, citizens will be much more skeptical and cynical about the simultaneous propaganda onslaughts that will occur, and actually prepared and ready to connect the dots. I guarantee you there will be many more digital and video cameras zooming in on any strange terrorist attacks this time. Perhaps our awareness and preparedness will even prevent another staged catastrophe.
The ball is now in our court, so let us run with it.
Red Alert: Has Santorum Let the Cat Out of the Bag?
-
Hollybaere
- Anti-Neocon novice
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:18 am
- Location: Sunny Florida
- Contact:
Red Alert: Has Santorum Let the Cat Out of the Bag?
The truth needs NO LAWS to support it.
-
NoApartheid
- Anti-Neocon Regular
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:02 am
The list?
Was Ricky Un-Sanitarium on the big fig D.C. list??
http://www.deborahjeanepalfrey.com
Sick little protestants and their sex scandals....
http://www.deborahjeanepalfrey.com
Sick little protestants and their sex scandals....
Rick Sanitarium, isn't he the Christian holy-roller who had a fit about gay marraiges saying it was unchristian and even devil worship? I would guess that such a born again is a loyal zionist and thus an insider. Not that he knows about what attacks will happen but it is something his friends have been slipping him to get him to go say it.
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
Hollybaere
- Anti-Neocon novice
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:18 am
- Location: Sunny Florida
- Contact:
Oh, and look who NOW is having a "Gut Feeling"...............
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... i-news-hed
Homeland Security chief warns of 'Increased risk’
Chertoff bases 'gut feeling' on history, al-Qaeda statements.
By E.A. Torriero
Tribune staff reporter
July 10, 2007, 1:36 PM CDT
Fearing complacency among the American people over possible terror threats, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in Chicago Tuesday that the nation faces a heightened chance of an attack this summer.
"I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk," Chertoff told the Chicago Tribune's editorial board in an unusually blunt and frank assessment of America's terror threat level.
"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," he said of al-Qaeda. "We do worry that they are rebuilding their activities."
Still, Chertoff said there are not enough indications of an imminent plot to raise the current threat levels nationwide. And he indicated that his remarks were based on "a gut feeling" formed by past seasonal patterns of terrorist attacks, recent al-Qaeda statements, and intelligence he did not disclose.
There is an assessment "not of a specific threat, but of increased vulnerability," he added.
There have been reports already that suggest intelligence warnings at a similar level to the summer before Sept. 11, 2001 and that al-Qaeda may be mobilizing.
In recent days, ABC news reported that a secret law enforcement report prepared for homeland security warns that al-Qaeda is preparing a "spectacular" summer attack. On Tuesday, ABC News also reported that "new intelligence suggests a small al-Qaeda cell is on its way to the United States, or may already be here."
Chertoff sternly echoed those sentiments at the Tribune.
"We've seen a lot more public statements from Al Qaeda," he said. "There are a lot of reasons to speculate about that but one reason that occurs to me is that they're feeling more comfortable and raising expectations.
"We could easily be attacked," Chertoff added. "The intent to attack us remains as strong as it was on Sept. 10, 2001."
The dire warnings and Chertoff's comments come as the Bush administration faces political and business opposition over its immigration and border policies that have security implications.
With stiff blowback on those issues, the administration has been unsuccessful in efforts to enact broader security measures - ones opponents fear are too costly, unnecessary and infringe on people's rights.
In a wide-ranging interview with the Tribune that lasted more than an hour, Chertoff said, too, that the recent failure of Congress to pass an immigration bill has negative repercussions for homeland security and will lead to continued federal crackdowns on illegal immigrants.
Resistance has built as well, he said, from business and travel interests blocking his proposals to tighten security at the borders - especially at the crossings with Canada.
In the end, Chertoff argued, Americans must soon decide between enduring greater inconvenience and costs or allowing terrorists easier access to the borders. He warned against increasing resistence to security measures based on comfort and self-centered motives.
"If you get to complacency then I guarantee you we will lose the race with the terrorists," he said.
A recent terror plot in London and Scotland has America's defense system on alert, Chertoff said. He urged Americans to be attentive if something appears suspicious.
"If you look at that picture you see an enemy that is improving itself just as we're improving ourselves," he said. "They can't afford to remain static just as we can't afford to remain static."
On a local level, Chertoff cited Chicago's technologically savvy police department and its use of street-corner, blue-lighted cameras as a blueprint for strong homeland security.
"I think the use of cameras here and other technologies is a model for the country," he said
Over the next 18 months, as the Bush administration draws to a close, Chertoff said he plans to put security tradeoff options before the American public.
"The public has to make the choices," he said.
If border crossings are not tightened with stricter document regulation because of economic oppositions from business interests, then Chertoff predicts possible dire consequences.
"What do you think is going to happen to your business when a guy comes across the border with a phony document and blows up a target in Buffalo or Detroit?" he asked. "Do you think the American public is then going to allow the border to remain open?"
There will be security repercussions from Congress' failure to pass immigration reform. Chertoff hoped granting a path to citizenship to illegal immigrants would cut away "the tall grass" hiding criminal elements among the undocumented workers.
But now, Chertoff said, his agency must uphold current laws and that means a further crackdown on workplaces.
"We are going to do more law enforcement actions," he said.
Conceding the raids are "going to be ugly" and tear parents from their children who wonder why they have not returned from work, Chertoff warned: "the consequences are going to be tough from an economic and humanitarian standpoint."
Noting that he was disappointed at Congress' failure to pass a bill, Chertoff singled out committees that included members like Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Max Baucus (R-Montana) as impediments to his homeland security initiatives.
Letter's released Tuesday to the Tribune from Grassley's office show a bickering back and forth between Chertoff and the senators in June. The senators wrote that Chertoff was misleading in his characterization of their efforts to amend the immigration bill. Their intention, they said, was not to overburden employers with expensive checks of all employees or to force the release of tax information on employees.
With the bill tabled, Chertoff said he plans to now concentrate on a variety of security plans including filling in security gaps by more closely monitoring private aircraft entering the United States and intensifying coastal checks in less secure areas outside of the strictly-patrolled ports.
"We have done a lot to degrade the enemy's capability," he said. "But the enemy has also done a lot to retool its capability...It leads me to feel we ought to be more vigilant."
Just remember this criminal posesses TWO citizenships. One for the U.S. and one for Israel.
Yet, HE is our Homeland Security Chief.
If what he claims in this article is true, then "The War on (of) Terror" is about a bogus as a Three Dollar Bill!!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... i-news-hed
Homeland Security chief warns of 'Increased risk’
Chertoff bases 'gut feeling' on history, al-Qaeda statements.
By E.A. Torriero
Tribune staff reporter
July 10, 2007, 1:36 PM CDT
Fearing complacency among the American people over possible terror threats, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in Chicago Tuesday that the nation faces a heightened chance of an attack this summer.
"I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk," Chertoff told the Chicago Tribune's editorial board in an unusually blunt and frank assessment of America's terror threat level.
"Summertime seems to be appealing to them," he said of al-Qaeda. "We do worry that they are rebuilding their activities."
Still, Chertoff said there are not enough indications of an imminent plot to raise the current threat levels nationwide. And he indicated that his remarks were based on "a gut feeling" formed by past seasonal patterns of terrorist attacks, recent al-Qaeda statements, and intelligence he did not disclose.
There is an assessment "not of a specific threat, but of increased vulnerability," he added.
There have been reports already that suggest intelligence warnings at a similar level to the summer before Sept. 11, 2001 and that al-Qaeda may be mobilizing.
In recent days, ABC news reported that a secret law enforcement report prepared for homeland security warns that al-Qaeda is preparing a "spectacular" summer attack. On Tuesday, ABC News also reported that "new intelligence suggests a small al-Qaeda cell is on its way to the United States, or may already be here."
Chertoff sternly echoed those sentiments at the Tribune.
"We've seen a lot more public statements from Al Qaeda," he said. "There are a lot of reasons to speculate about that but one reason that occurs to me is that they're feeling more comfortable and raising expectations.
"We could easily be attacked," Chertoff added. "The intent to attack us remains as strong as it was on Sept. 10, 2001."
The dire warnings and Chertoff's comments come as the Bush administration faces political and business opposition over its immigration and border policies that have security implications.
With stiff blowback on those issues, the administration has been unsuccessful in efforts to enact broader security measures - ones opponents fear are too costly, unnecessary and infringe on people's rights.
In a wide-ranging interview with the Tribune that lasted more than an hour, Chertoff said, too, that the recent failure of Congress to pass an immigration bill has negative repercussions for homeland security and will lead to continued federal crackdowns on illegal immigrants.
Resistance has built as well, he said, from business and travel interests blocking his proposals to tighten security at the borders - especially at the crossings with Canada.
In the end, Chertoff argued, Americans must soon decide between enduring greater inconvenience and costs or allowing terrorists easier access to the borders. He warned against increasing resistence to security measures based on comfort and self-centered motives.
"If you get to complacency then I guarantee you we will lose the race with the terrorists," he said.
A recent terror plot in London and Scotland has America's defense system on alert, Chertoff said. He urged Americans to be attentive if something appears suspicious.
"If you look at that picture you see an enemy that is improving itself just as we're improving ourselves," he said. "They can't afford to remain static just as we can't afford to remain static."
On a local level, Chertoff cited Chicago's technologically savvy police department and its use of street-corner, blue-lighted cameras as a blueprint for strong homeland security.
"I think the use of cameras here and other technologies is a model for the country," he said
Over the next 18 months, as the Bush administration draws to a close, Chertoff said he plans to put security tradeoff options before the American public.
"The public has to make the choices," he said.
If border crossings are not tightened with stricter document regulation because of economic oppositions from business interests, then Chertoff predicts possible dire consequences.
"What do you think is going to happen to your business when a guy comes across the border with a phony document and blows up a target in Buffalo or Detroit?" he asked. "Do you think the American public is then going to allow the border to remain open?"
There will be security repercussions from Congress' failure to pass immigration reform. Chertoff hoped granting a path to citizenship to illegal immigrants would cut away "the tall grass" hiding criminal elements among the undocumented workers.
But now, Chertoff said, his agency must uphold current laws and that means a further crackdown on workplaces.
"We are going to do more law enforcement actions," he said.
Conceding the raids are "going to be ugly" and tear parents from their children who wonder why they have not returned from work, Chertoff warned: "the consequences are going to be tough from an economic and humanitarian standpoint."
Noting that he was disappointed at Congress' failure to pass a bill, Chertoff singled out committees that included members like Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Max Baucus (R-Montana) as impediments to his homeland security initiatives.
Letter's released Tuesday to the Tribune from Grassley's office show a bickering back and forth between Chertoff and the senators in June. The senators wrote that Chertoff was misleading in his characterization of their efforts to amend the immigration bill. Their intention, they said, was not to overburden employers with expensive checks of all employees or to force the release of tax information on employees.
With the bill tabled, Chertoff said he plans to now concentrate on a variety of security plans including filling in security gaps by more closely monitoring private aircraft entering the United States and intensifying coastal checks in less secure areas outside of the strictly-patrolled ports.
"We have done a lot to degrade the enemy's capability," he said. "But the enemy has also done a lot to retool its capability...It leads me to feel we ought to be more vigilant."
Just remember this criminal posesses TWO citizenships. One for the U.S. and one for Israel.
Yet, HE is our Homeland Security Chief.
If what he claims in this article is true, then "The War on (of) Terror" is about a bogus as a Three Dollar Bill!!
The truth needs NO LAWS to support it.
-
NoApartheid
- Anti-Neocon Regular
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:02 am
Th Entire war on terror.
The entire war on terror is bullshit. Fakery designed by this bunch of scum.
The MIC concocted the whole war on terror with of course the Vatican.
The MIC concocted the whole war on terror with of course the Vatican.
The Vatican at best invests in the MIC they dont dorect it but all these religious groups profit from war because it is a no shit investment and each had tens of billion of tax free money to invest.
It is no single group. The Church has in the past killed off entire nations. And the Protestants did the same thing to North America. They have absolutely no [roblem assiting the US military with private contractors, money and brainwashed Xtian troops. But the way they can phyiscally profit is buy investments in defense industires. Still its the Zionist (mostly Jews and allied with Protestant preachers) who run the equitty firms and the MEDIA and that is the most important thing.
It is no single group. The Church has in the past killed off entire nations. And the Protestants did the same thing to North America. They have absolutely no [roblem assiting the US military with private contractors, money and brainwashed Xtian troops. But the way they can phyiscally profit is buy investments in defense industires. Still its the Zionist (mostly Jews and allied with Protestant preachers) who run the equitty firms and the MEDIA and that is the most important thing.
Get The Empire Unmasked here