how was/is exploited nonviolent action for political ends

[Gargaroth]

I highly recommend you to read this rant so you can extract some knowlege as to how to act to defend against such method or if you wish, to use it them against the established system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The elite have for many years explored and analyze the human thinking to find a way to control them favorable to their desires, that work is now done by inteligence agencies too like CIA, as you all noticed there is widespread acceptance of figures perceived as sweet, gentle, nonviolent like Ghandi or Martin Luther King or the peaceful rebellions of the 60 and 70 in many western countries specialy the U.S which were heavily repressed and its leaders arrested or assasinated, this trend was studied by Gene Sharp where he writes extensively about it in his books, he founded the Albert Einstein Institut which is a non-government organization that ironically is funded by U.S government and has connections and trainning from the CIA(in my opinion the founder is a CIA agent), the named picked for the organization was well though because Albert Einstein turned out to be nonviolent protester too and is well known internationally, but the real purpose of this international "non-governmental" organizations is to destabilize governments all around the world deemed unfriendly or with strategic importance, installing puppet or complacent regimes, this was specialy used in eastern europe countries with the famous color revolutions which lead to deep economic recessions and even depressions and social disorders in countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yoguslavia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria etc... and more recently Serbia(collapse of Yoguslavia), George, Ukraine and the Ceder revolution which installed the puppet regime of Lebanon, this uprisings are planed and have direct training and funding from NGO(nongovernmental organizations) like Albert Einstein Institut(which is a cover for the CIA) or Soros Foundation among others(not all NGO are for this purposes however), this nonviolent color revolutions actualy traces its routes to Portugals flower revolution, a primarily military and secondary civic revolution which overthrew a U.S supported dictatorial regime with no bloodshed, althoug this revolution generated from disastisfaction inside the military predominantly left-leaning that briefly elected a Communist infuenced president in the trasition to demoracy process which then saw a more "moderate" center politician take control in the elections, it was not infuenced by foreign powers and it was nonviolent because the government didnt attempt to resist part of the military in rebellion, the concept of color came from this revolution altough the broadly color revolution term is used with completely diferent tatics,that things that are caracteristic in this revolutions are, the protesters act irrational in most cases and can't explain whats the purpose of their actions or describe and use short and unspecific sentences to describe their disastisfaction with the government, its like a new fashion tendency or a advertisement on tv or a reality show or the european soccer culture which drags entire nations to euphoria in World cups, to defend against this there is two tatics one is not allowinng by actions like censoring the media, the groups and prohibitions or arrests, however this tatic does not work for a truely free society and has a high chance of allowing a growing disastisfaction however this may in part work in some societies like U.S where there is a corporation dictatorship which effectively censors much of the media by various processes from ignoring or redicularization to personal attacks until a certain point where it can no longer contain it, by this time a second wave comes this is the minimalization of the magnitud of the problem or the blame shift tatic, blame on the president or something else so you can have a new face with the same policies, the tatic to maintain this trend on the culture is with various layers in society convered by the influence of institutions statel or private with the same line of thought of a minority effectively creating a cultural hegemony of the dominante classes, the second tatic is the exposing tatic with communitary and investigative jornalism done by persons not corporations, this is the one who works best because you informe and educate the manipulated mass and allows for a open and free society where the constitution can uphold good jornalism and finish up bad jornalism through the legal institutions thus creating a supportive mainstream trend in favor of the government in danger from external influence enabling manifestations of support. This tatic can be used of course the other way around, by members of the majority against the minority but it is mainly developped naturally or by a catalytic event because the majority of the population are not worried about or are not politic scientists and do not organize to creat a artificial or better yet a planned revolution, thats why the flowers revolution was a military revolution with a chain of command and a specific organization. If you wish to learn tatics for that change to happen you must defenitelly read the expert books that is Gene Sharp his theorization comes from different areas from politics to marketing.

sorry for any typos the text might have.

[Iconoclast]

Needs more paragraphs.