Judaism VS Jews Vs Zionists

Current events, politics, and more.
User avatar
rory5
Anti-Neocon Regular
Anti-Neocon Regular
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:58 pm

Jesus Was a Palestinian

Post by rory5 » Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:27 pm

Get this, the Jesus of the bible, if you're gonna believe in him, you must face the facts that he was most likely Jesus of Palestine.

OHH, THE "FALSE FLAGS" ABOUND!!

Armageddon Politics:

http://www.metahistory.org/ArmageddonPolitics.php

Jesus of Palestine:

http://www.metahistory.org/lexicon_J.php
Rory5

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Judaism VS Jews Vs Zionists

Post by Iconoclast » Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:50 pm

british_freedom_fighter wrote:
Ry wrote:Why continue believing in the lies of the Jews from Religion to Communism its all unhealthy.
Could you set me an explanation, or a link to an explanation, as to how communism is a jewish lie?
Engels
Lenin
Marx
Trotsky
Zinoviev
Kamenev
Martov
More, but wikipedia jews decided to "neutralize" the bolshevism page.



See also: Jewish Bund (secular Jews)

Here is a link from a white supremacist site, but the info is probably correct (and their "white history" website has mostly seemed to be well researched from what I've seen):

http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/hwr61.htm
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

User avatar
nycsnakeeyes
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:49 pm

Post by nycsnakeeyes » Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:49 pm

show me evidence of the "Aryan Invasion of the Indus valley" in India , there is none and on top of that, if the "aryans" did mix with the indians, we would have blonde hair right now. at least some of us. however, the word Aryan comes frm the root Arya and that means noble person. and that word was only mentioned in the rig veda scriptures that described Rama, who was an Emissionary frm Shamballah.

the indus valley invasion my friend is false, never happened. it sounds good but it has its faults to the point of non existance

and about the myths of the aztecs, everything is a myth and legend until proven true, and that would explain as to why mexicans became short and powerhouses in terms of combat. if that wasnt so, Cortez wouldve walked all over them during his first war with them.
heirarchy of bullshit

User avatar
Redelicious
Protesting War
Protesting War
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:55 pm

Post by Redelicious » Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:57 pm

There was no Aryan invasion, the Aryans came over a process of more than 150 years. They came to be on top because they brought the cows which at that time ment they controlled the money supply.

Anyway Ry good rant as usual. Judaism and Henduism are racism religions by design. Zionist Judaism is the worst one ever made. And people are brain dead to follow these myths without question.
The original anti-neoconImage

Boycott Israel. Don't back down Norway. We back you up.

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Post by Iconoclast » Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:58 pm

Redelicious wrote:There was no Aryan invasion, the Aryans came over a process of more than 150 years. They came to be on top because they brought the cows which at that time ment they controlled the money supply.

Anyway Ry good rant as usual. Judaism and Henduism are racism religions by design. Zionist Judaism is the worst one ever made. And people are brain dead to follow these myths without question.
I'm no master of the subject, but I believe the Aryan invasion theory is the most likely one. People don't like it because it isn't politically correct and shows racism in the ancient world. The Aryans were warlike and managed to subjugate a people and divide them by caste (varna does mean color, after all). It isn't too hard to figure out.

As for Aryan meaning noble, Irish and Iranian also mean noble as they are derived from the Indo-European word arya (I think). They didn't mean to say they were noble and the Dravidians were not (although they could have indeed thought that).

Hinduism is a tolerable religion (or set of religions). No way it is similar (spiritually) to Judaism. It is possible that Judaism is partially derived from Hinduism, but then again, probably most other modern religions are as well due to its influence and age.
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Post by Iconoclast » Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:07 pm

nycsnakeeyes wrote:show me evidence of the "Aryan Invasion of the Indus valley" in India , there is none and on top of that, if the "aryans" did mix with the indians, we would have blonde hair right now. at least some of us. however, the word Aryan comes frm the root Arya and that means noble person. and that word was only mentioned in the rig veda scriptures that described Rama, who was an Emissionary frm Shamballah.
Mud travels upstream , LOL. A more polite version (but less amusing) is that blonde hair and blue eyes are recessive traits. I don't know if the Aryans had those features (they probably did, in all likelihood, but I need research for it. I think I did recall hearing about blue-eyed Indians).

Face it, the Aryans were an Indo-European people. I hope you aren't suggesting the Out-Of-India theory.

But you can see many Brahamics/Ksatriyas with lighter skin tone in Northern India... in fact it is very common to mistake them for European.
and about the myths of the aztecs, everything is a myth and legend until proven true, and that would explain as to why mexicans became short and powerhouses in terms of combat. if that wasnt so, Cortez wouldve walked all over them during his first war with them.
I'm curious; are you part Mestizo/Mexican, or do you have a significant other who is? Just a question.

The Aztecs did travel in desert areas before arriving to their place (I think it begins with "Tenochi--" but I won't try to make a guess) but they were already known for their warlike tendencies beforehand.
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Post by Iconoclast » Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:08 pm

nycsnakeeyes wrote:show me evidence of the "Aryan Invasion of the Indus valley" in India , there is none and on top of that, if the "aryans" did mix with the indians, we would have blonde hair right now. at least some of us. however, the word Aryan comes frm the root Arya and that means noble person. and that word was only mentioned in the rig veda scriptures that described Rama, who was an Emissionary frm Shamballah.
Mud travels upstream , LOL. A more polite version (but less amusing) is that blonde hair and blue eyes are recessive traits. I don't know if the Aryans had those features (they probably did, in all likelihood, but I need research for it. I think I did recall hearing about blue-eyed Indians).

Face it, the Aryans were an Indo-European people. I hope you aren't suggesting the Out-Of-India theory.

But you can see many Brahamics/Ksatriyas with lighter skin tone in Northern India... in fact it is very common to mistake them for European.
and about the myths of the aztecs, everything is a myth and legend until proven true, and that would explain as to why mexicans became short and powerhouses in terms of combat. if that wasnt so, Cortez wouldve walked all over them during his first war with them.
I'm curious; are you part Mestizo/Mexican, or do you have a significant other who is? Just a question.

The Aztecs did travel in desert areas before arriving to their place (I think it begins with "Tenochi--" but I won't try to make a guess) but they were already known for their warlike tendencies beforehand.
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

flanker12k
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:17 pm

Post by flanker12k » Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:47 pm

Iconoclast wrote:
nycsnakeeyes wrote:show me evidence of the "Aryan Invasion of the Indus valley" in India , there is none and on top of that, if the "aryans" did mix with the indians, we would have blonde hair right now. at least some of us. however, the word Aryan comes frm the root Arya and that means noble person. and that word was only mentioned in the rig veda scriptures that described Rama, who was an Emissionary frm Shamballah.
Mud travels upstream , LOL. A more polite version (but less amusing) is that blonde hair and blue eyes are recessive traits. I don't know if the Aryans had those features (they probably did, in all likelihood, but I need research for it. I think I did recall hearing about blue-eyed Indians).

Face it, the Aryans were an Indo-European people. I hope you aren't suggesting the Out-Of-India theory.

But you can see many Brahamics/Ksatriyas with lighter skin tone in Northern India... in fact it is very common to mistake them for European.
and about the myths of the aztecs, everything is a myth and legend until proven true, and that would explain as to why mexicans became short and powerhouses in terms of combat. if that wasnt so, Cortez wouldve walked all over them during his first war with them.
I'm curious; are you part Mestizo/Mexican, or do you have a significant other who is? Just a question.

The Aztecs did travel in desert areas before arriving to their place (I think it begins with "Tenochi--" but I won't try to make a guess) but they were already known for their warlike tendencies beforehand.
Yup you are absolutely right about the north indians being mistaken for white folk. Dude I have cousins who have freakin hazel colored eyes and they are "indian" hinduism being a good religion? FACK NO, caste system mean anything? there are still residual effects from it still to this day.

User avatar
Iconoclast
no leftist
no leftist
Posts: 1171
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:06 pm
Contact:

Post by Iconoclast » Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:51 pm

The caste system is pretty clever. I have no qualms about it at all; it is essentially breeding people for certain societal tasks. If I ran a society I would have something similar to prevent the morons from breeding with the intelligent people.
"When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him." ~ Jonathan Swift

User avatar
nycsnakeeyes
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:49 pm

Post by nycsnakeeyes » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:10 am

i am east indian born in the caribbean, trinidad .

yeah one thing i will say is that there is some indians up north, ancestry wise thats where im from, that is very white in color and can almost be mistaken for spanish or very rarely white people. however this doesntmean that they defintely have blood from the nordic peoples , cuz black people have thier light skinned people too, and one thing ill tell u about indians cuz i am one, its nothing good in terms of color when ur from india. see,

the caste system was racially motivated, devious and a smart idea working for all the wrong people,

now the indians only stick to lighter colored indians in terms of marriage and so on, lighter color and good job makes u king out there. however im brown lollll so i know this very well. and that caste system made them stick to one another in terms of color without hesistation of thinking twice. ive heard a lotta bad stories when the lighter person married a darker person in a marriage, lighter persons family disowns them and blah blah uknwo the rest. dramas. lol.


but blacks go through this too, there is lighter blacks who try to stick to lighter skinned blacks, some dont talk about it or act like it dont happen but it does. and thats sad. but thats my big idea on the color. as to how they got that light in the first place (indians) i wouldnt know.

at first i accepted the indus valley invasion theory, but when i read more into it, its nothing more than made up history that circled around a name, Aryan. thats all it is to me, and that name came out of a prestigeous book, if u wanna look at it that way, the rig veda. and when th british put that in the history texts in schools in india of the time of the occupation teaching the youth that white nordic men gave india thier culture ? uhhh i dont think so .

the blue eyed indian ? i never saw one in my life heard or seen one.


and lastly, the irish culture is no different from culture of india. for some reason we have EXACTLY the same religous settings, brahmas & druids were all in the same class, the high priest class which was the highest of all ranks in both thier caste systems. the list goes on but blah anyone can find info on that here on the net if they want to, but there is striking similarities which still astounds me especially when modern genetics state that east indians and indians of south asia is also considered Caucasian. now thats mindblowing.
heirarchy of bullshit

Post Reply