Cat is out of the Bag! Gore came out with it.

Current events, politics, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Cat is out of the Bag! Gore came out with it.

Post by Ry » Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:23 am

Well the cat is out of the Bag Al Gore came out with his proposal for a CO2 tax.

I was in Physics class a few years ago like 5 years ago in college and I am so glad we had a professor who talked about Global warming.

He showed the Al Gore crap (this was before Gore had a film) and the typical arguments. Then he pulled back a sheet showing the rest of the graph and just blew global warming away.

Evidence will ruin global warming. IT was hotter 1k years ago than it is now.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

User avatar
Muhammad Ali
Anti-Neocon Regular
Anti-Neocon Regular
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:04 am

Post by Muhammad Ali » Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:26 am

Al Gore is a huge Zionist BTW
Image

User avatar
Liszt
King Cnut
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:31 am
Contact:

Post by Liszt » Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:41 pm

Al Gore runs a company with someone called David Blood. Blood and Gore.

http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article ... e1568.html

Al Gore and David Blood Graft Sustainability Research into Traditional Investing Analysis

what a weirdo!

User avatar
The_Big_Lebowski
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:15 am

Post by The_Big_Lebowski » Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:49 pm

It seems like he's just about slapping a fine on energy use instead of putting his time into providing affordable alternative energies.

User avatar
operator-c
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:47 pm
Contact:

Post by operator-c » Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:54 pm

The_Big_Lebowski wrote:It seems like he's just about slapping a fine on energy use instead of putting his time into providing affordable alternative energies.
That's what I get from it...

I'm all for going away from fossil fuels-- and I believe it's possible, and the technology exists. Hell, hydrogen-on-demand is certainly feasible, but it's not "healthy" for the economy; also, weening off of oil within a decade is NOT realistic.

I'm not sold on the global warming bullshit. I can't say one way or the other because I don't know who to trust. I've seen evidence and speculation that goes both ways, but, being the skeptic that I am, I'm inclined to disbelieve it's a man-made occurrence. This is especially true when considering the theories that our solar system is going through a warming phase.

I damn sure don't support any sort of carbon tax. Fuck that. Fuck Gore.

Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Post by Ed » Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:54 pm

operator-c wrote:
The_Big_Lebowski wrote:It seems like he's just about slapping a fine on energy use instead of putting his time into providing affordable alternative energies.
That's what I get from it...

I'm all for going away from fossil fuels-- and I believe it's possible, and the technology exists. Hell, hydrogen-on-demand is certainly feasible, but it's not "healthy" for the economy; also, weening off of oil within a decade is NOT realistic.

I'm not sold on the global warming bullshit. I can't say one way or the other because I don't know who to trust. I've seen evidence and speculation that goes both ways, but, being the skeptic that I am, I'm inclined to disbelieve it's a man-made occurrence. This is especially true when considering the theories that our solar system is going through a warming phase.

I damn sure don't support any sort of carbon tax. Fuck that. Fuck Gore.
Well your view of global warming is similar to mine. There's a good documentary about it called the great global warming swindle. I remember there was some guy that put a bet on for months on what temperature it was gonna be every day just by monitoring the sun. He won lots of cash.

Saying renewable energy is not 'healthy' for the economy is just saying that you don't want to do it because there's other stuff we'd rather be spending money on like invading countries, and funding dictatorships and racial apartheid police states.

If the US cut spending on crap like that they would be able to afford to install a fucking solar panel the size of the grand canyon. but of course that's just crazy talk with all the genocide we need to fund. Can't let down a friend like Israel!
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

User avatar
operator-c
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:47 pm
Contact:

Post by operator-c » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:41 pm

Ed wrote:
operator-c wrote:
The_Big_Lebowski wrote:It seems like he's just about slapping a fine on energy use instead of putting his time into providing affordable alternative energies.
That's what I get from it...

I'm all for going away from fossil fuels-- and I believe it's possible, and the technology exists. Hell, hydrogen-on-demand is certainly feasible, but it's not "healthy" for the economy; also, weening off of oil within a decade is NOT realistic.

I'm not sold on the global warming bullshit. I can't say one way or the other because I don't know who to trust. I've seen evidence and speculation that goes both ways, but, being the skeptic that I am, I'm inclined to disbelieve it's a man-made occurrence. This is especially true when considering the theories that our solar system is going through a warming phase.

I damn sure don't support any sort of carbon tax. Fuck that. Fuck Gore.
Well your view of global warming is similar to mine. There's a good documentary about it called the great global warming swindle. I remember there was some guy that put a bet on for months on what temperature it was gonna be every day just by monitoring the sun. He won lots of cash.

Saying renewable energy is not 'healthy' for the economy is just saying that you don't want to do it because there's other stuff we'd rather be spending money on like invading countries, and funding dictatorships and racial apartheid police states.

If the US cut spending on crap like that they would be able to afford to install a fucking solar panel the size of the grand canyon. but of course that's just crazy talk with all the genocide we need to fund. Can't let down a friend like Israel!
Too true, my friend... too true.
Image

Ed
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
Location: South Korea

Post by Ed » Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:35 pm

no one is denying that the climate is changing, people only question how much of it is man's influence. the fact is the earth's climate has changed A LOT in history and we wouldn't be able to stop that anyway. not that we shouldn't be more energy efficient and or move towards more cleaner renewable energy.
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by Ry » Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:04 pm

It seems like he's just about slapping a fine on energy use instead of putting his time into providing affordable alternative energies.
Exactly and the main reason oil prices are up is the falling dollar and the main use of oil is gasoline not electricity. The US gets 1% of its electricity from oil.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

Post Reply