Excellent James Petras Article

Post by **Tribulation** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:35 am

http://www.lahaine.org/petras/b2-img/petras_zion.pdf

Zion-power and War: From Iraq to Iran. The Deadly Embrace

Explanations for the US attack on Iraq range from military-political pretexts to accounts focusing on geopolitical and economic interests. The original official explanation was the now discredited claim that Saddam Hussein possessed chemical, biological and other weapons of mass destructions (WMD), which threatened the US, Israel and the Middle East....

Please share

Peace

Post by Ry » Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:17 am

Its already been explained. The Israelis and Israeli dual citizens wrote the Naked Truth about their desires in the PNAC documents. They don't want any power rivals to Israel in the Middle East and they want a complete monopoly on the world banking system which right is now is about everyone but the "rouge" states.

Post by **Tribulation** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:57 am

Ry wrote:Its already been explained. The Israelis and Israeli dual citizens wrote the Naked Truth about their desires in the PNAC documents. They don't want any power rivals to Israel in the Middle East and they want a complete monopoly on the world banking system which right is now is about everyone but the "rouge" states.

I understand that. I was not attempting to preach to the choir! What I find in the article is facts pertaining to the 'oil theory' for the war that most anti-war folks point the finger at (rather than look at the the whole picture). The article clearly shows big oil did not want the war or occupation of Iraq. At the same time it explains the truth..

This is a very good article (the best i've found!) to give to these 'War for Oil' folks that have been misled. To win against these war-mongering greedy creeps MORE people need to have the right information. Sharing this article with it's facts may be quite revealing to 'War for Oil' folks. I believe there are many more of them then folks that know the truth.

Post by Ry » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:41 pm

He was on anti-war radio too saying the same things. And you are right understanding that it was not about oil is crucial. OS we could have bought the oil several times over for the cost of just one year of the war.