Leftist insanity goes too far since apparently Muslim rape can not be discussed because of hate laws or because of white guilt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Last edited by Drew J on Sun Sep 27, 2015 2:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: When leftist insanity goes too far
The only reason feminists oppose any kind of discussion about the problems of Islam from straight white men is because straight white men are rapists too. To them it's a pot calling a kettle black. The only difference to the feminists is that they don't rape women under the guise of religion. And feminists correctly don't want white men to point out bad Muslims while refusing to own their own shit.
But at least white men don't cut their women's heads off, though.
But at least white men don't cut their women's heads off, though.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Feminists Pave the Way for Women to be Raped
By: Amber Pawlik
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/AmberPawlik31229.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feminists, who are just one arm in the multiculturalist, socialist left establishment, are quite loud in talking about women’s rights in the Middle East. Indeed, they are justified in complaining about the poor treatment of women in the Middle East. Under Saddam’s regime, his two sons would point to the women they wanted, then rape them. Under the Islamic regime in Iran, Iranian women are hanged for committing adultery. Feminists win over the hearts of Westerners because all Westerners agree this type of behavior is ugly and wrong. Westerners overwhelmingly favor peace and liberty for everybody.
But feminists are exploiting Western compassion. It is time to pull the pants off of these beasts: they never were and never will be in favor of women or women’s rights. Their recent response to gang rapes in Australia reveals them for what they are.
In Sydney Australia, two men, Pakistan-born Muslims, were found guilty of gang rapes of two teenage girls. This comes as strict justice for a growing problem in this region. Muslim men have been roaming Sydney gang, raping non-Muslim women, calling them "Aussie pigs" and "sluts" who ask for it. If previous jail sentences are any indication of their punishment, a 55 yr long jail term is in their future as was given to Balil Skaf.
This, of course, is a victory for women’s rights. Especially in Pakistani culture, where honor killings take place, the shame is often placed on the rape victim not the aggressor. One would think feminists would embrace such a court ruling.
But feminist reaction was not praise; it was hostility. Those in the audience at the conference that announced the news cried the convictions were “nothing but racist prosecutions.” They were outraged over the “racism” of the strict punishments given to the Muslims rapists.
To these feminists, protection for Muslims – to stop “racist” comments about Muslims – out-trumps justice for rape victims. The Anti-Discrimination Board in Australia pumped out pamphlets chastising the media for “Anti-Muslim” bigotry – meanwhile non-Muslim women have to worry about being brutally raped by a gang of Muslim thugs.
Hysterics from the likes of the Anti-Discrimination Board seem to be working: cops are now afraid to stand up to Muslim criminals. This includes an incident when cops found three Muslims with stolen property. They called for backup – and so did the three Muslims. After the stand off, the final response of the cops was to order the officers to retreat.
You may scratch your head at the actions of feminists – defending Muslim rapists and not rape victims. Don’t. This is to be expected. From my experience in anti-feminist activism, there is one thing I have learned: feminists do not care about female victims of rape, sexual assault, or domestic violence. They only embrace these issues for propaganda reasons. Let me explain how and why this work – why feminists embracing the Muslim gang members and not the rape victims is to be expected.
Feminists pounced on the issue of rape not because they cared about rape victims, but because it allowed them to spread class warfare. Spreading scare tactics about rape, such as the false notion that one in four women will be raped, that 2/3 of women will be sexually harassed, etc., allowed them to make women feel like “victims.” Victimhood is a precondition for socialism. They divided the world into two groups, in typical Marxist fashion: women as the oppressed class and men as the oppressor class.
Because it has nothing to do with who genuinely is a victim and who is the oppressor, but rather is about what class you are in, women can easily be forgotten. If a racial or ethnic class that the establishment gives higher priority to is involved, women will get dismissed. Muslim men, who are a politically protected class, are given higher status than women. Therefore, Muslim gangs can rape white women, and the Muslim rapists will get protection – feminists will not condemn it.
This is not an isolated case of this happening either. During the OJ Simpson trial, the National Organization for Women, the largest, most visible feminist organization in America, defended OJ Simpson not Nicole Brown Simpson, i.e. the black, male murderer not the white female victim. It should be relatively common knowledge now that feminists do not care about female victims of rape or sexual/domestic violence.
Feminists are not interested in solving these issues. When you talk to feminists, it appears as if they are actually happy when it is proven there is more rape or sexual assault in society. Indeed, despite all their activism in the past 30 years, they will admit themselves that rape and violence in society has in fact increased.
Feminists utterly fail at solving these issues. You know who is effective at solving these evils? Conservatives, especially conservative men.
Every conservative man I know who hears of these gangs raping women vow they would take the situation into their own hands if the law didn’t bring justice to the rape victims. Despite feminist activism for several years about the oppression of women in the Middle East – under the likes of the Taliben and Sadddam Hussein – they were utterly impotent in their ability to help Middle Eastern women. It was conservatives, the Bush administration, with quick, effective military action that liberated these people, including women, from these oppressive regimes. I am reminded of the two different first wives relationship to women in the Middle East: Laura Bush preached to Middle Eastern leaders that they need to educate their girls as well as their boys; Hillary Clinton’s only bragging right is she tried on a burqa.
The moral relativism, class warfare, and all around hatred of the left is not condusive to liberating people, women’s rights, or peace and liberty. It’s time to take these issues away from the left. They don’t deserve them. They don’t stand for women. They don’t stand for peace. They don’t stand for liberty. They hate George Bush more than they hate Saddam Hussein. They like Muslim gangs better than they like non-Muslim rape victims. Their claims that they stand for human rights, peace, and women’s rights are just a covering.
I believe what they are doing is conditioning the world to accept the initiation of force. They apologize for Islam but hate Christianity because they see that Islam creates nothing but thugs. Therefore, if the world is hyper “tolerant” of Muslims, they can literally loot, rape, and pillage us, and the whole population will be left unable to defend ourselves. Indeed, when people do rise to defend themselves against thugs, the left will smear them as being “violent.”
Sorry, but Muslims can be held to the same moral standard as every other human being, and they can learn how to follow the law. If feminists really cared about women in the Middle East, they would strike at the root of the problem: Islam. Despite what Shirin Ebadi says, the problem for women in the Middle East is not “the patriarchy,” it is Islam. Muslims are literally given a free pass to do whatever they want – including raping women, looting restaurants in France that sell food not approve by the Koran, etc. Unless moral people start speaking up – not cowering in fear, worried about being called a “racist” – this and other issues like it (not the least of which is terrorism) literally will mean the death of us.
By: Amber Pawlik
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/AmberPawlik31229.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feminists, who are just one arm in the multiculturalist, socialist left establishment, are quite loud in talking about women’s rights in the Middle East. Indeed, they are justified in complaining about the poor treatment of women in the Middle East. Under Saddam’s regime, his two sons would point to the women they wanted, then rape them. Under the Islamic regime in Iran, Iranian women are hanged for committing adultery. Feminists win over the hearts of Westerners because all Westerners agree this type of behavior is ugly and wrong. Westerners overwhelmingly favor peace and liberty for everybody.
But feminists are exploiting Western compassion. It is time to pull the pants off of these beasts: they never were and never will be in favor of women or women’s rights. Their recent response to gang rapes in Australia reveals them for what they are.
In Sydney Australia, two men, Pakistan-born Muslims, were found guilty of gang rapes of two teenage girls. This comes as strict justice for a growing problem in this region. Muslim men have been roaming Sydney gang, raping non-Muslim women, calling them "Aussie pigs" and "sluts" who ask for it. If previous jail sentences are any indication of their punishment, a 55 yr long jail term is in their future as was given to Balil Skaf.
This, of course, is a victory for women’s rights. Especially in Pakistani culture, where honor killings take place, the shame is often placed on the rape victim not the aggressor. One would think feminists would embrace such a court ruling.
But feminist reaction was not praise; it was hostility. Those in the audience at the conference that announced the news cried the convictions were “nothing but racist prosecutions.” They were outraged over the “racism” of the strict punishments given to the Muslims rapists.
To these feminists, protection for Muslims – to stop “racist” comments about Muslims – out-trumps justice for rape victims. The Anti-Discrimination Board in Australia pumped out pamphlets chastising the media for “Anti-Muslim” bigotry – meanwhile non-Muslim women have to worry about being brutally raped by a gang of Muslim thugs.
Hysterics from the likes of the Anti-Discrimination Board seem to be working: cops are now afraid to stand up to Muslim criminals. This includes an incident when cops found three Muslims with stolen property. They called for backup – and so did the three Muslims. After the stand off, the final response of the cops was to order the officers to retreat.
You may scratch your head at the actions of feminists – defending Muslim rapists and not rape victims. Don’t. This is to be expected. From my experience in anti-feminist activism, there is one thing I have learned: feminists do not care about female victims of rape, sexual assault, or domestic violence. They only embrace these issues for propaganda reasons. Let me explain how and why this work – why feminists embracing the Muslim gang members and not the rape victims is to be expected.
Feminists pounced on the issue of rape not because they cared about rape victims, but because it allowed them to spread class warfare. Spreading scare tactics about rape, such as the false notion that one in four women will be raped, that 2/3 of women will be sexually harassed, etc., allowed them to make women feel like “victims.” Victimhood is a precondition for socialism. They divided the world into two groups, in typical Marxist fashion: women as the oppressed class and men as the oppressor class.
Because it has nothing to do with who genuinely is a victim and who is the oppressor, but rather is about what class you are in, women can easily be forgotten. If a racial or ethnic class that the establishment gives higher priority to is involved, women will get dismissed. Muslim men, who are a politically protected class, are given higher status than women. Therefore, Muslim gangs can rape white women, and the Muslim rapists will get protection – feminists will not condemn it.
This is not an isolated case of this happening either. During the OJ Simpson trial, the National Organization for Women, the largest, most visible feminist organization in America, defended OJ Simpson not Nicole Brown Simpson, i.e. the black, male murderer not the white female victim. It should be relatively common knowledge now that feminists do not care about female victims of rape or sexual/domestic violence.
Feminists are not interested in solving these issues. When you talk to feminists, it appears as if they are actually happy when it is proven there is more rape or sexual assault in society. Indeed, despite all their activism in the past 30 years, they will admit themselves that rape and violence in society has in fact increased.
Feminists utterly fail at solving these issues. You know who is effective at solving these evils? Conservatives, especially conservative men.
Every conservative man I know who hears of these gangs raping women vow they would take the situation into their own hands if the law didn’t bring justice to the rape victims. Despite feminist activism for several years about the oppression of women in the Middle East – under the likes of the Taliben and Sadddam Hussein – they were utterly impotent in their ability to help Middle Eastern women. It was conservatives, the Bush administration, with quick, effective military action that liberated these people, including women, from these oppressive regimes. I am reminded of the two different first wives relationship to women in the Middle East: Laura Bush preached to Middle Eastern leaders that they need to educate their girls as well as their boys; Hillary Clinton’s only bragging right is she tried on a burqa.
The moral relativism, class warfare, and all around hatred of the left is not condusive to liberating people, women’s rights, or peace and liberty. It’s time to take these issues away from the left. They don’t deserve them. They don’t stand for women. They don’t stand for peace. They don’t stand for liberty. They hate George Bush more than they hate Saddam Hussein. They like Muslim gangs better than they like non-Muslim rape victims. Their claims that they stand for human rights, peace, and women’s rights are just a covering.
I believe what they are doing is conditioning the world to accept the initiation of force. They apologize for Islam but hate Christianity because they see that Islam creates nothing but thugs. Therefore, if the world is hyper “tolerant” of Muslims, they can literally loot, rape, and pillage us, and the whole population will be left unable to defend ourselves. Indeed, when people do rise to defend themselves against thugs, the left will smear them as being “violent.”
Sorry, but Muslims can be held to the same moral standard as every other human being, and they can learn how to follow the law. If feminists really cared about women in the Middle East, they would strike at the root of the problem: Islam. Despite what Shirin Ebadi says, the problem for women in the Middle East is not “the patriarchy,” it is Islam. Muslims are literally given a free pass to do whatever they want – including raping women, looting restaurants in France that sell food not approve by the Koran, etc. Unless moral people start speaking up – not cowering in fear, worried about being called a “racist” – this and other issues like it (not the least of which is terrorism) literally will mean the death of us.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
http://human-stupidity.com/equality4/di ... ing-part-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafening. (Part 1)
5000 rape per year epidemic caused by politically correct refugee and immigration policy in Sweden.
Rape epidemic diversity will spread to small towns, more countries. Feminists don’t care. click for larger picture. See which countries pledge to house many refugees that likely will cause car burning and rape epidemics: mainly Sweden, Germany
Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape in the world [50]. 5000 forcible rapes per year. Virtually all forcible violent rapes are committed by immigrants. [60 61 64 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 73]
Thus: There would be no rape epidemic, virtually no forcible rapes, riots and car burnings [80 81 2013 82 2015 2014a b c] in Scandinavia, had they not invited refugees and immigrants from Muslim and African countries.
All Swedish municipalities that have not previously “welcomed” refugees will be forced to do so. [90] The inevitably ensuing rape epidemics in formerly idyllic safe villages can still still be avoided.
EU plans to force European Nations to accept Migrants [10 11]. This will bring rape epidemic culture and violence culture [91] to all European countries. Even those that have not yet been diversity enriched (Portugal, Spain, Eastern Europe). Feminists don’t protest the further spreading of rape epidemic culture.
Sweden has one of the highest rape rates in the world. The violent forcible rape epidemic is due to Muslim and African immigrants. It is taboo, even illegal, to state these truths, to quote such statistics.
Police interview: All outdoor rapes in Oslo are committed by immigrants (Muslims)| YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SekSsdTUy40" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feminists don’t protest about violent gang rapes. Feminists obsess about objectifying gaze, gender mainstreaming, sexist language, marital rape, consensual sex when drunk, women’s choice to be a sex worker. But violent gang rapes by minorities, not of interest to feminists.
No rape epidemic, no race riots, no car burnings without refugees, without uncontrolled immigration
Europe encourages smugglers and human traffickers to bring in Millions of foreigners from totally different cultures. This has “saved” maybe 1% of the African population. It brought race riots, 400 000 (!) burned cars in France [91], 1000 burned cars at each New Year’s in Paris alone. It destroyed the virtually crime free peace of large parts of Europe. Women live in fear of rape epidemics. Poorer countries, and small towns will be invaded by rape epidemics and crime shortly.
Yes, not every African is a rapist. Not 100% of refugees participate in large style week long Stockholm and Paris riots and arson. Explain this to your raped daughters; to the majority of the population who simply does not dare to walk the formerly safe streets.
Political Correctness, the MSM lying press, the equality lie, self censorship, hate speech laws are to blame. And European good-heartedness, excessive pathological altruism.
Swedish woman brutally gang-raped by Muslim refugees now in a wheelchair. Socialist:” It’s racism to expel them”
https://violenceagainstwhites.wordpress ... elchair-2/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sacrificing Our Daughters: On the Psychology of Islamic Rape epidemic Gangs
https://youtu.be/LbpAXRfbE-A" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
20 refugees rape an 11-year old girl in a public bath, Stockholm Sweden, Husbybadet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy-lXixUiJM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Swedish Rape Epidemic avoidable. Feminists’ silence deafening. (Part 1)
5000 rape per year epidemic caused by politically correct refugee and immigration policy in Sweden.
Rape epidemic diversity will spread to small towns, more countries. Feminists don’t care. click for larger picture. See which countries pledge to house many refugees that likely will cause car burning and rape epidemics: mainly Sweden, Germany
Sweden has one of the highest rates of rape in the world [50]. 5000 forcible rapes per year. Virtually all forcible violent rapes are committed by immigrants. [60 61 64 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 73]
Thus: There would be no rape epidemic, virtually no forcible rapes, riots and car burnings [80 81 2013 82 2015 2014a b c] in Scandinavia, had they not invited refugees and immigrants from Muslim and African countries.
All Swedish municipalities that have not previously “welcomed” refugees will be forced to do so. [90] The inevitably ensuing rape epidemics in formerly idyllic safe villages can still still be avoided.
EU plans to force European Nations to accept Migrants [10 11]. This will bring rape epidemic culture and violence culture [91] to all European countries. Even those that have not yet been diversity enriched (Portugal, Spain, Eastern Europe). Feminists don’t protest the further spreading of rape epidemic culture.
Sweden has one of the highest rape rates in the world. The violent forcible rape epidemic is due to Muslim and African immigrants. It is taboo, even illegal, to state these truths, to quote such statistics.
Police interview: All outdoor rapes in Oslo are committed by immigrants (Muslims)| YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SekSsdTUy40" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feminists don’t protest about violent gang rapes. Feminists obsess about objectifying gaze, gender mainstreaming, sexist language, marital rape, consensual sex when drunk, women’s choice to be a sex worker. But violent gang rapes by minorities, not of interest to feminists.
No rape epidemic, no race riots, no car burnings without refugees, without uncontrolled immigration
Europe encourages smugglers and human traffickers to bring in Millions of foreigners from totally different cultures. This has “saved” maybe 1% of the African population. It brought race riots, 400 000 (!) burned cars in France [91], 1000 burned cars at each New Year’s in Paris alone. It destroyed the virtually crime free peace of large parts of Europe. Women live in fear of rape epidemics. Poorer countries, and small towns will be invaded by rape epidemics and crime shortly.
Yes, not every African is a rapist. Not 100% of refugees participate in large style week long Stockholm and Paris riots and arson. Explain this to your raped daughters; to the majority of the population who simply does not dare to walk the formerly safe streets.
Political Correctness, the MSM lying press, the equality lie, self censorship, hate speech laws are to blame. And European good-heartedness, excessive pathological altruism.
Swedish woman brutally gang-raped by Muslim refugees now in a wheelchair. Socialist:” It’s racism to expel them”
https://violenceagainstwhites.wordpress ... elchair-2/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sacrificing Our Daughters: On the Psychology of Islamic Rape epidemic Gangs
https://youtu.be/LbpAXRfbE-A" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
20 refugees rape an 11-year old girl in a public bath, Stockholm Sweden, Husbybadet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy-lXixUiJM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Feminists Mute on Muslim Rape Epidemic Sweeping Europe
Sexual assaults skyrocket after countries open their doors to "multiculturalism"
http://www.infowars.com/feminists-mute- ... ng-europe/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
by Paul Joseph Watson | February 19, 2015
After years of screaming bloody murder about a rape epidemic on college campuses in the United States that didn’t exist, feminists remain mute on the real rape epidemic sweeping Europe – that being perpetrated primarily by Muslim men.
Feminist groups have campaigned tirelessly to draw attention to their claim that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. This figure was completely debunked by a December 2014 U.S. Department of Justice report which found that non-students are 25% more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students.
In fact, the actual rate of female college students becoming sexual assault victims is 6.1 per 1,000 students, compared to 7.6 per 1,000 people for non-students. That means that just 0.03-in-5 female students, not one in five, are victims of sexual assault.
The myth of the college campus rape epidemic was prominently illustrated in November last year when it emerged that the Rolling Stone’s lurid University of Virginia gang-rape story was almost certainly fabricated. This was just one of numerous college rape scandals that turned out to be completely contrived.
“The truth is that there’s no epidemic outbreak of college rape,” writes Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor. “In fact, rape on college campuses is — like rape everywhere else in America — plummeting in frequency. And that 1-in-5 college rape number you keep hearing in the press? It’s thoroughly bogus, too. (Even the authors of that study say that “We don’t think one in five is a nationally representative statistic,” because it sampled only two schools.)”
While feminists are quick to condemn the ‘white male patriarchy’ for non-existent rape scandals in America, their attitude to actual rape epidemics being carried out by Muslim men across Europe has been noticeably more reserved.
UNITED KINGDOM
In 2012, it emerged that over a thousand mostly white young girls in the northern England town of Rotherham were systematically groomed, trafficked, beaten and sexually abused by rape gangs consisting of mainly Pakistani Muslim men. A report released earlier this month confirmed that the local Labour government council and the police covered up this horror because they were afraid of being characterized as racist or politically incorrect.
For over 15 years, criminal rape gangs were protected by the authorities because of their foreign ethnicity. Meanwhile, young girls were being beaten and raped, then ignored, labeled liars and left defenseless because they were white.
The reaction from feminists to this outrage, even after an initial 2013 report confirmed the depth of the scandal, was either complete silence or even tacit agreement with how the Labour government dealt with the issue.
The shocking escalation of sexual assaults against women attributed to growing immigrant Muslim populations in the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Sweden and Norway has also been almost universally ignored by feminist groups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75aLYqRFq9I" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DENMARK
Crime rates broken down by nationality in Denmark show that individuals from Muslim countries make up eight of the top nine places on the list. In addition, 2012 figures show that Somalis were sentenced for crimes, including innumerable sexual assaults, almost ten times more often than those with Danish citizenship.
Indeed, more than half of all convicted rapists in Denmark have an immigrant background, according to official statistics, despite the fact that immigrants and their descendants account for less than 10 per cent of the population. “Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark,” reports BT.dk.
When Lars Hedegaard, the President of the Danish (and International) Free Press Society, drew attention to these shocking statistics, he wasn’t hailed by feminist groups for shedding much needed light on the matter, he was found guilty of “hate speech” under section 266b of the Danish penal code.
As Phyllis Chesler, Emerita Professor of Psychology and Women’s Studies at City University of New York, points out, “Hedegaard’s crime was to note “the great number of family rapes in areas dominated by Muslim culture in Denmark.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJamev9_syo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SWEDEN
Since it embraced multiculturalism in 1975, Sweden has become the rape capital of the west, with only the tiny African nation of Lesotho recording more sexual assaults.
Rapes in Sweden have skyrocketed by a shocking 1,472% since the mid-70’s, with 6,620 sexual assaults being reported to police in 2014 compared to just 421 in 1975.
“77.6 percent of the country’s rapists are identified as “foreigners” (and that’s significant because in Sweden, “foreigner” is generally synonymous with “immigrant from Muslim country”), writes Selwyn Duke. “And even this likely understates the issue, since the Swedish government — in an effort to obscure the problem — records second-generation Muslim perpetrators simply as “Swedes.”
Duke cites a report by the aforementioned Lars Hedegaard and his colleague Ingrid Carlqvist, two journalists who documented, “A new trend (that) reached Sweden with full force over the past few decades: gang rape — virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. The number of gang rapes increased spectacularly between 1995 and 2006. Since then no studies of them have been undertaken.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fBwSfmgjl0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Authorities have failed to properly investigate the rape epidemic over fears of offending ‘multicultural’ sensitivities – as happened in Rotherham.
“In cases of gang rape, culprits and victims are most often young and in almost every case, the perpetrators are of immigrant background, mostly from Muslim countries. In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists. Several times the courts have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted sex with six, seven or eight men,” states the report.
Just as in Denmark, authorities came down harder on those blowing the whistle on the Muslim rape epidemic than those actually perpetrating the assaults.
“A local Sweden Democrat Party politician named Michael Hess was convicted of the hate-speech charge “denigration of ethnic groups” for making his claim,” writes Duke. “It didn’t matter that he has lived in Muslim countries and that at his trial he presented evidence on the Sharia law position on rape; the court claimed, reports Dispatch International, “that the question of whether or not Michael Hess’s pronouncement is true, or appeared to be true to Michael Hess, has no bearing on the case.”
News outlets in Sweden also routinely fail to report the ethnicity of accused rapists, referring to them only as “Swedes”.
MUSLIM GANGS TAKE CONTROL OF 55 ZONES IN SWEDEN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thXCb1VUBDg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last year, Swedish police also released a list of 55 “no go zones,” mostly Muslim ghettos, where law enforcement and ambulance workers are at risk of violent attack. In 2013, Stockholm suffered a wave of violent riots by mostly immigrant youths.
NORWAY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiVVvJIM5UI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In Norway, almost half of all rapes committed in Oslo in 2011 were carried out by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin, despite the fact that Muslim immigrants only represent 1.5-2 per cent of the population.
In addition, 100 per cent of aggravated rapes involving physical violence were committed by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin.
Leftist political leaders responded to the figures by absolving “traumatized asylum seekers” of blame and instead pointed fingers at police for encouraging “xenophobia and prejudice” merely for reporting the statistics.
These statistics clearly illustrate that Europe, and particularly Scandinavia which has thrown its doors wide open to immigration in the name of multiculturalism, is suffering a rape epidemic which is almost entirely attributable to Muslim immigrants and their descendents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_FB1g52Goo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
RAMPANT FEMINIST HYPOCRISY
So why do feminists habitually ignore crimes against women committed by way of a belief system – Islam – that treats women as second class citizens?
The answer is obvious; Third wave feminism has little to do with protecting the rights of women and everything to do with social engineering.
Because the Muslim rape epidemic cannot be blamed on the ‘white male patriarchy’ that radical feminist groups seek to dismantle, it’s of zero advantage to feminists to draw attention to crimes against women that are not being committed by white western males. A similar criticism is also leveled at feminists for their obsession with trivial issues such as comet scientist Matt Taylor’s “sexist” shirt over and above matters such as female genital mutilation (FGM) within Muslim and African communities.
In addition, calling out the Islamic belief system for its abhorrent treatment of women would open feminists up to charges of being racist and politically incorrect from their leftist ideological allies. Feminists would rather avoid this rhetorical civil war than actually address genuine threats to gender equality.
While young women all over Europe are being targeted by Muslim rape gangs who believe their behavior is consistent with Islamic teachings, top feminists like Anita Sarkeesian are spending millions of dollars on campaigns to improve the portrayal of women in video games, which as the Gamergate scandal has revealed, is itself merely an underhanded ploy to create institutionalized cronyism and re-educate millions of young gamers.
The failure on behalf of feminist groups to devote adequate attention to the Muslim rape epidemic sweeping Europe unveils the true face of what characterizes third wave feminism – rampant hypocrisy and an agenda to downplay and dismiss genuine women’s rights issues that don’t fit into the warped paradigm of blaming everything on the evil white patriarchy.
Sexual assaults skyrocket after countries open their doors to "multiculturalism"
http://www.infowars.com/feminists-mute- ... ng-europe/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
by Paul Joseph Watson | February 19, 2015
After years of screaming bloody murder about a rape epidemic on college campuses in the United States that didn’t exist, feminists remain mute on the real rape epidemic sweeping Europe – that being perpetrated primarily by Muslim men.
Feminist groups have campaigned tirelessly to draw attention to their claim that one in five women on college campuses are victims of sexual assault. This figure was completely debunked by a December 2014 U.S. Department of Justice report which found that non-students are 25% more likely to be victims of sexual assault than students.
In fact, the actual rate of female college students becoming sexual assault victims is 6.1 per 1,000 students, compared to 7.6 per 1,000 people for non-students. That means that just 0.03-in-5 female students, not one in five, are victims of sexual assault.
The myth of the college campus rape epidemic was prominently illustrated in November last year when it emerged that the Rolling Stone’s lurid University of Virginia gang-rape story was almost certainly fabricated. This was just one of numerous college rape scandals that turned out to be completely contrived.
“The truth is that there’s no epidemic outbreak of college rape,” writes Glenn Harlan Reynolds, a University of Tennessee law professor. “In fact, rape on college campuses is — like rape everywhere else in America — plummeting in frequency. And that 1-in-5 college rape number you keep hearing in the press? It’s thoroughly bogus, too. (Even the authors of that study say that “We don’t think one in five is a nationally representative statistic,” because it sampled only two schools.)”
While feminists are quick to condemn the ‘white male patriarchy’ for non-existent rape scandals in America, their attitude to actual rape epidemics being carried out by Muslim men across Europe has been noticeably more reserved.
UNITED KINGDOM
In 2012, it emerged that over a thousand mostly white young girls in the northern England town of Rotherham were systematically groomed, trafficked, beaten and sexually abused by rape gangs consisting of mainly Pakistani Muslim men. A report released earlier this month confirmed that the local Labour government council and the police covered up this horror because they were afraid of being characterized as racist or politically incorrect.
For over 15 years, criminal rape gangs were protected by the authorities because of their foreign ethnicity. Meanwhile, young girls were being beaten and raped, then ignored, labeled liars and left defenseless because they were white.
The reaction from feminists to this outrage, even after an initial 2013 report confirmed the depth of the scandal, was either complete silence or even tacit agreement with how the Labour government dealt with the issue.
The shocking escalation of sexual assaults against women attributed to growing immigrant Muslim populations in the Scandinavian countries of Denmark, Sweden and Norway has also been almost universally ignored by feminist groups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75aLYqRFq9I" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DENMARK
Crime rates broken down by nationality in Denmark show that individuals from Muslim countries make up eight of the top nine places on the list. In addition, 2012 figures show that Somalis were sentenced for crimes, including innumerable sexual assaults, almost ten times more often than those with Danish citizenship.
Indeed, more than half of all convicted rapists in Denmark have an immigrant background, according to official statistics, despite the fact that immigrants and their descendants account for less than 10 per cent of the population. “Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis are dramatically overrepresented among convicted rapists in Denmark,” reports BT.dk.
When Lars Hedegaard, the President of the Danish (and International) Free Press Society, drew attention to these shocking statistics, he wasn’t hailed by feminist groups for shedding much needed light on the matter, he was found guilty of “hate speech” under section 266b of the Danish penal code.
As Phyllis Chesler, Emerita Professor of Psychology and Women’s Studies at City University of New York, points out, “Hedegaard’s crime was to note “the great number of family rapes in areas dominated by Muslim culture in Denmark.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJamev9_syo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SWEDEN
Since it embraced multiculturalism in 1975, Sweden has become the rape capital of the west, with only the tiny African nation of Lesotho recording more sexual assaults.
Rapes in Sweden have skyrocketed by a shocking 1,472% since the mid-70’s, with 6,620 sexual assaults being reported to police in 2014 compared to just 421 in 1975.
“77.6 percent of the country’s rapists are identified as “foreigners” (and that’s significant because in Sweden, “foreigner” is generally synonymous with “immigrant from Muslim country”), writes Selwyn Duke. “And even this likely understates the issue, since the Swedish government — in an effort to obscure the problem — records second-generation Muslim perpetrators simply as “Swedes.”
Duke cites a report by the aforementioned Lars Hedegaard and his colleague Ingrid Carlqvist, two journalists who documented, “A new trend (that) reached Sweden with full force over the past few decades: gang rape — virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. The number of gang rapes increased spectacularly between 1995 and 2006. Since then no studies of them have been undertaken.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fBwSfmgjl0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Authorities have failed to properly investigate the rape epidemic over fears of offending ‘multicultural’ sensitivities – as happened in Rotherham.
“In cases of gang rape, culprits and victims are most often young and in almost every case, the perpetrators are of immigrant background, mostly from Muslim countries. In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists. Several times the courts have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted sex with six, seven or eight men,” states the report.
Just as in Denmark, authorities came down harder on those blowing the whistle on the Muslim rape epidemic than those actually perpetrating the assaults.
“A local Sweden Democrat Party politician named Michael Hess was convicted of the hate-speech charge “denigration of ethnic groups” for making his claim,” writes Duke. “It didn’t matter that he has lived in Muslim countries and that at his trial he presented evidence on the Sharia law position on rape; the court claimed, reports Dispatch International, “that the question of whether or not Michael Hess’s pronouncement is true, or appeared to be true to Michael Hess, has no bearing on the case.”
News outlets in Sweden also routinely fail to report the ethnicity of accused rapists, referring to them only as “Swedes”.
MUSLIM GANGS TAKE CONTROL OF 55 ZONES IN SWEDEN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thXCb1VUBDg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last year, Swedish police also released a list of 55 “no go zones,” mostly Muslim ghettos, where law enforcement and ambulance workers are at risk of violent attack. In 2013, Stockholm suffered a wave of violent riots by mostly immigrant youths.
NORWAY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiVVvJIM5UI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In Norway, almost half of all rapes committed in Oslo in 2011 were carried out by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin, despite the fact that Muslim immigrants only represent 1.5-2 per cent of the population.
In addition, 100 per cent of aggravated rapes involving physical violence were committed by individuals of African, Middle Eastern or Asian origin.
Leftist political leaders responded to the figures by absolving “traumatized asylum seekers” of blame and instead pointed fingers at police for encouraging “xenophobia and prejudice” merely for reporting the statistics.
These statistics clearly illustrate that Europe, and particularly Scandinavia which has thrown its doors wide open to immigration in the name of multiculturalism, is suffering a rape epidemic which is almost entirely attributable to Muslim immigrants and their descendents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_FB1g52Goo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
RAMPANT FEMINIST HYPOCRISY
So why do feminists habitually ignore crimes against women committed by way of a belief system – Islam – that treats women as second class citizens?
The answer is obvious; Third wave feminism has little to do with protecting the rights of women and everything to do with social engineering.
Because the Muslim rape epidemic cannot be blamed on the ‘white male patriarchy’ that radical feminist groups seek to dismantle, it’s of zero advantage to feminists to draw attention to crimes against women that are not being committed by white western males. A similar criticism is also leveled at feminists for their obsession with trivial issues such as comet scientist Matt Taylor’s “sexist” shirt over and above matters such as female genital mutilation (FGM) within Muslim and African communities.
In addition, calling out the Islamic belief system for its abhorrent treatment of women would open feminists up to charges of being racist and politically incorrect from their leftist ideological allies. Feminists would rather avoid this rhetorical civil war than actually address genuine threats to gender equality.
While young women all over Europe are being targeted by Muslim rape gangs who believe their behavior is consistent with Islamic teachings, top feminists like Anita Sarkeesian are spending millions of dollars on campaigns to improve the portrayal of women in video games, which as the Gamergate scandal has revealed, is itself merely an underhanded ploy to create institutionalized cronyism and re-educate millions of young gamers.
The failure on behalf of feminist groups to devote adequate attention to the Muslim rape epidemic sweeping Europe unveils the true face of what characterizes third wave feminism – rampant hypocrisy and an agenda to downplay and dismiss genuine women’s rights issues that don’t fit into the warped paradigm of blaming everything on the evil white patriarchy.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Friends of Rape: How Feminist Liberals Help Sex-Crime to Flourish
September 8, 2014
Tobias Langdon
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/20 ... -flourish/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Deafeningly. That’s how liberals would have reacted if the victims in Rotherham had been Pakistani, the rapists White and the cover-up organized by the Conservative party and its allies in the right-wing media. If the scandal had been like that, the Guardian would have boiled with righteous wrath and indignation: “The horror of it. At least 1,400 victims subject to sixteen years of rape, torture and degradation. These right-wing officials and journalists should be put on trial for their active, wilful complicity in these racist atrocities. Then we should lock them up and throw away the key.”
I think it would have gone something like that. But alas for liberals, it wasn’t evil right-ringers who were complicit in the horrors of Rotherham: it was golden-hearted liberals. Which political party gave rape-gangs the go-ahead year after year? Not the Conservatives or the British National Party, but feminist Labour, champions of the poor and vulnerable. Which newspaper dictated the multi-culti, rape-friendly politics of left-wing councillors and social workers in Rotherham? Not the Daily Mail or the Times, but the feminist Guardian, that staunch opponent of sex-crimes and patriarchal oppression. And you don’t have to take my word about the Guardian’s role in more than a decade of rapes, beatings and psychological torture:
In short, what caused the horrors in Rotherham was the ideology of the Guardian, as absorbed and applied by its dedicated readers in local government and social services. That ideology postures about rape and male violence while actually promoting them. The Guardian supports mass immigration from violent and misogynistic Third World nations, then conceals the consequences. It demonizes anyone who speaks the truth about the numerous pathologies imported by Muslims and other non-Whites. The Times wasn’t first with the news about Muslim rape-gangs in northern England: it was Nick Griffin, then the leader of the British National Party. And the Guardian wanted Griffin to go to jail for what he said.
If there are people who should be put on trial and imprisoned or expelled from Britain for promoting crime on a massive scale, it isn’t anyone in the British National Party and other nationalist organizations. No, it’s the politicians and journalists who have directly assisted a war of violence and rape waged by non-Whites against the White British. Here are a few of the guilty men and women:
Friend of Rape #1: Keith Vaz
Keith Vaz is the greasy and sleazy Labour MP who chairs the Commons Home Affairs Committee. He is now set to grill Shaun Wright, the police and crime commissioner excoriated by the Guardian for his failures in Rotherham. But Vaz himself concealed the truth about Muslim sex-crimes and helped them to continue:
Friend of Rape #2: Sue Berelowitz
Vaz referred to “children’s experts.” Here is the most influential of them all:
Friends of Rape #3 and #4: Nazir Afzal and Javed Khan
These two dishonest and deceitful Muslims are, respectively, the “Crown Prosecution Service’s lead on child sexual abuse” and the Chief Executive of the Child Welfare charity Barnardo’s. The blogger Irish Savant reacts to them like this:
Friend of Rape #5: Jonathan Freedland
When this Jewish journalist at the Guardian learned about White girls in Rotherham being raped and threatened with incineration, his thoughts naturally flew to another group who have suffered appallingly: some Jews who had eggs thrown at them in 2006:
Friend of Rape #6: Hugh Muir
Hugh Muir is one of the Guardian’s prized Black journalists. When reality contradicts his ideology, he does the right thing and denies reality:
He may also have missed this, published in the Guardian in September: “The Home Office researcher … also said she had been accused of being insensitive when she told one official that most of the perpetrators were from Rotherham’s Pakistani community. A female colleague talked to her about the incident. ‘She said you must never refer to that again – you must never refer to Asian men. And her other response was to book me on a two-day ethnicity and diversity course to raise my awareness of ethnic issues.’” (see here).
And if Muir thinks there is “no minority lobby for criminals and paedophiles,” he needs to read what the Labour MP Simon Danczuk says about the “abuse” he receives from Muslims when he declines to make “representations on behalf of brothers who have been found guilty of child sex abuse” (see here and above).
Friend of Rape #7: Libby Brooks
While vibrant rape-gangs were hard at work in Rotherham, Oxford, Telford and many other British cities, Libby Brooks was hard at work too, denying reality and helping the crimes to continue:
Friend of Rape #8: Liz Fekete
Last but not least, we have the Jewish anti-fascist Liz Fekete, who has worked for decades to conceal the truth about vibrant crime and ensure that it continues. She wrote this in 2012:
Instead, liberals are on the defensive, frantically lying and blowing smoke as they try to conceal the moral bankruptcy of their ideology and causes. There are more scandals like Rotherham to come and each new revelation will further expose liberals for what they are: promoters of hate and chaos, enemies of women and children, not friends and protectors. The Rotherham scandal has set a stake on the heart of the liberal vampire. Now history will begin to hammer it home.
September 8, 2014
Tobias Langdon
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/20 ... -flourish/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Deafeningly. That’s how liberals would have reacted if the victims in Rotherham had been Pakistani, the rapists White and the cover-up organized by the Conservative party and its allies in the right-wing media. If the scandal had been like that, the Guardian would have boiled with righteous wrath and indignation: “The horror of it. At least 1,400 victims subject to sixteen years of rape, torture and degradation. These right-wing officials and journalists should be put on trial for their active, wilful complicity in these racist atrocities. Then we should lock them up and throw away the key.”
I think it would have gone something like that. But alas for liberals, it wasn’t evil right-ringers who were complicit in the horrors of Rotherham: it was golden-hearted liberals. Which political party gave rape-gangs the go-ahead year after year? Not the Conservatives or the British National Party, but feminist Labour, champions of the poor and vulnerable. Which newspaper dictated the multi-culti, rape-friendly politics of left-wing councillors and social workers in Rotherham? Not the Daily Mail or the Times, but the feminist Guardian, that staunch opponent of sex-crimes and patriarchal oppression. And you don’t have to take my word about the Guardian’s role in more than a decade of rapes, beatings and psychological torture:
Deluded though they still are about mass immigration, Ann Cryer and Simon Danczuk have qualities unknown to most liberals: courage, honesty and integrity. Those are certainly not words that can be applied to the disgraced MP Denis MacShane, a dedicated champion of “the Jewish community” who was jailed in December 2013 for expenses fraud. But MacShane too has pointed out which newspaper created the “culture of denial” where gang-rape could flourish:Labour MPs: Left ignored sex abuse
A culture of Left-wing political correctness led politicians and officials to ignore the plight of young girls who were being sexually abused by Asian men, Labour figures have warned. Ann Cryer, an MP from 1997 until 2010, told The Sunday Telegraph how she had feared being called “racist” when, in 2002, she exposed a sex-abuse scandal involving Pakistani men in her constituency of Keighley, West Yorkshire. A “politically correct Left just saw it as racism”, she said.
At the same time, Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, revealed that even now some of his colleagues disapproved of his efforts to uncover child abuse, because some were “obsessing about multiculturalism”. It follows the exposure last week of the scale of child sexual abuse in Rotherham. An inquiry estimated that at least 1,400 girls as young as 11 were assaulted and raped by gangs of Asian men over a period of 16 years. Some had guns pointed at them or were doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight. Mrs Cryer recalled how there was a politically correct Left that saw her fight as racism. “At the time I was dealing with this, 2002-04, political correctness was playing a big part. The Guardian at that time hardly mentioned these things… because it was so politically correct.” (Labour MPs: Left ignored sex abuse, The Daily Telegraph, 30th Aug 2014)
Yes, that Guardian editorial has a long list of guilty parties: “the police, social services and the state failed the children; so, too, did local councillors.” Conspicuous by their absence are some folk much closer to home: editors and journalists at the Guardian (and its Sunday version the Observer). The Guardian cares so deeply about victims and the vulnerable that its website has special sections devoted to women, children, child protection, rape and domestic violence. But it was the right-wing Times “whose estimable reporting sparked the inquiry” into what was happening in Rotherham. It seems that pious posturing isn’t enough to protect the vulnerable. But the Guardian isn’t going to break the habit of a lifetime just yet:Rotherham: Sorry isn’t good enough. When will Britain learn to protect its children?
… Denis MacShane, who was Labour MP for Rotherham at the time, also says he didn’t know. Can it be the case that he was blinkered to the plight of his desperate constituents: parents fighting to get the authorities to do something about the abuse happening to their daughters? Could the disconnect between him and the community he represented have been so great? Was he so far removed from the business of the council that he didn’t know about the presentations to councillors on child sexual exploitation as long ago as 2004? His plea that his “liberal leftie” Guardian-reading tendencies prevented him from digging deeper for fear of upsetting cultural sensitivities smacks of a post-hoc justification of his abject failure to do anything: an excuse hardly befitting a parliamentarian of 18 years. If he was so unable or unwilling to exercise proper scrutiny and inquiry in his constituency (that being his job, after all) then he should have resigned long before he was forced to – in 2012 – when he was charged, and later convicted, of fraud while serving as an MP. Politics failed the young children of Rotherham too. (Rotherham: Sorry isn’t good enough. When will Britain learn to protect its children?, The Guardian, 31st August 2014)
“Bitterly criticized” by whom? Guardian-readers, of course. NASA should get in touch with the writer of that editorial: there’s enough hot air and humbug there to send a six-man crew to Mars and back. Let’s review the sorry list of failure: “lack of leadership… reluctance to ask difficult questions or to intervene proactively … dangerous reluctance to address what went so damagingly wrong for so many vulnerable young women… colossal institutional failure in child protection… misguided reluctance to consider whether there was an issue of race involved… terrible misjudgment: the subordination of the safeguarding of abused and exploited children to the protection of the standing of one particular community…”The Guardian view on the Rotherham child abuse scandal: no excuse. Nothing should stand in the way of protecting the vulnerable. Those who fail should take responsibility
Shaun Wright, Labour’s South Yorkshire police and crime commissioner, who was Rotherham’s cabinet member for children and young people’s services from 2005 until 2010, is refusing to resign. He apologises unreservedly for the grotesque abuse that 1,400 children or more may have endured on his watch, but he says the scale of the abuse has come as a surprise to him. … His lack of leadership, his reluctance to ask difficult questions or to intervene proactively, allowed the exploitation itemised in Professor Alexis Jay’s grim report on Tuesday to grow from what an earlier investigator called gang abuse for personal gratification into “financial and career opportunities” for young, mainly Asian, men. His failure to take responsibility now, in the face of the evidence, suggests a dangerous reluctance to address what went so damagingly wrong for so many vulnerable young women.
Rotherham is not alone in experiencing colossal institutional failure in child protection. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and a pattern of abuse that has now resulted in convictions in towns from Torbay to Rochdale is very likely to be happening in other places not yet identified. … Then there was a misguided reluctance to consider whether there was an issue of race involved. Finally, they lacked any kind of institutional data-sharing that might have allowed police, schools, hospitals and social workers to understand what was happening.
The question of ethnicity is particularly contentious. Rotherham is a very white, poor, working-class town with a growing but still small – less than 10% – black and minority ethnic population of which less than a third is Muslim. In last May’s local elections, Ukip won most votes and became the official opposition on the council. A march by the English Defence League during the campaign drew 500 supporters. On Tuesday, one of the first on Twitter with a gloating tweet was Nick Griffin of the BNP. In that context it is understandable that the Labour council was sensitive to the reputation of its Muslim community. But it led to a terrible misjudgment: the subordination of the safeguarding of abused and exploited children – who were mainly, but not only, white – to the protection of the standing of one particular community. When the then Labour MP Ann Cryer, the anti-forced-marriage campaigner, began reporting accounts of young Pakistani-heritage men hanging about school gates in 2003, she was bitterly criticised. (The Guardian view on the Rotherham child abuse scandal: no excuse, The Guardian, 27th August 2014)
In short, what caused the horrors in Rotherham was the ideology of the Guardian, as absorbed and applied by its dedicated readers in local government and social services. That ideology postures about rape and male violence while actually promoting them. The Guardian supports mass immigration from violent and misogynistic Third World nations, then conceals the consequences. It demonizes anyone who speaks the truth about the numerous pathologies imported by Muslims and other non-Whites. The Times wasn’t first with the news about Muslim rape-gangs in northern England: it was Nick Griffin, then the leader of the British National Party. And the Guardian wanted Griffin to go to jail for what he said.
If there are people who should be put on trial and imprisoned or expelled from Britain for promoting crime on a massive scale, it isn’t anyone in the British National Party and other nationalist organizations. No, it’s the politicians and journalists who have directly assisted a war of violence and rape waged by non-Whites against the White British. Here are a few of the guilty men and women:
Friend of Rape #1: Keith Vaz
Keith Vaz is the greasy and sleazy Labour MP who chairs the Commons Home Affairs Committee. He is now set to grill Shaun Wright, the police and crime commissioner excoriated by the Guardian for his failures in Rotherham. But Vaz himself concealed the truth about Muslim sex-crimes and helped them to continue:
Keith Vaz says child sex ring case ‘not race issue’
Leading MP Keith Vaz has insisted the case of an Asian paedophile gang that exploited dozens of vulnerable white teenagers is not a “race issue”. Mr Vaz, chairman of the Commons home affairs committee, said the “appalling” offences of the kind carried out by the gang needed to be looked into but it was important not to “stigmatise a whole community”.
He made the remarks after nine men from Rochdale were convicted for their role in a child sex ring. Police and social workers have been accused of failing to investigate the gang for fear of being perceived as racist, allowing them to prey on up to 50 young white girls.
Mr Vaz told [the BBC radio programme] Today the offences committed by the gang were “absolutely appalling crimes”. But he added: “Right at the start of this trial the BNP were outside demonstrating saying that this was a race issue. I do not believe it is a race issue.” He said his view was backed by the police and children’s experts. (Keith Vaz says child sex ring case ‘not race issue’, The Telegraph, 9th May 2012)
Friend of Rape #2: Sue Berelowitz
Vaz referred to “children’s experts.” Here is the most influential of them all:
Sex gangs report ‘will play down threat of Pakistani men targeting white girls’
An official inquiry into child sex gangs will fail to highlight the targeting of white girls by Pakistani men. Instead the year-long Government-backed investigation will say that child sex abuse is a problem caused by men of all backgrounds in towns and cities across the country. The findings of the inquiry by Sue Berelowitz, the Deputy Children’s Commissioner for England, are likely to anger ministers and provoke disbelief among those who have observed and investigated cases of abuse of teenage girls in towns in Lancashire and Yorkshire. …
Education Secretary Michael Gove said in May that Miss Berelowitz should not let her inquiries be swayed by questions of prejudice and should instead ‘ask tough questions about cultural background’. However her first report, to be published next week, will argue that the problem lies with men from all ethnic backgrounds. … A spokesman for Miss Berelowitz said there would be no comment on the report until it is published next week. But a senior political figure with long experience of trying to combat sex gangs said there is a specific problem with groups of young Pakistani men, and that Miss Berelowitz would be wrong to ignore it. (Sex gangs report ‘will play down threat of Pakistani men targeting white girls’, The Daily Mail, 16th November 2012)
Friends of Rape #3 and #4: Nazir Afzal and Javed Khan
These two dishonest and deceitful Muslims are, respectively, the “Crown Prosecution Service’s lead on child sexual abuse” and the Chief Executive of the Child Welfare charity Barnardo’s. The blogger Irish Savant reacts to them like this:
How the hell have what are arguably the two most important positions for preventing child abuse been awarded to members of the ethno-religious ‘community’ that specialises in this very crime? It goes without saying that there were many native British applicants for these posts. But in each case they appointed those from a community notorious for its treatment of and attitude to child sex abuse as well as a byword for corruption, extremism, filth and incompetence. (Monkeys and bananas, Irish Savant, 5th September 2014)
Friend of Rape #5: Jonathan Freedland
When this Jewish journalist at the Guardian learned about White girls in Rotherham being raped and threatened with incineration, his thoughts naturally flew to another group who have suffered appallingly: some Jews who had eggs thrown at them in 2006:
So Freedland piously believes that the Muslim “community” doesn’t support “abusers and torturers.” The Labour MP Simon Danczuk has a different story:Rotherham inquiry: the ‘PC gone mad’ defence is itself a form of racism
This week political correctness was blamed for a vicious and persistent series of crimes: the organised rape and sexual exploitation of 1,400 children, most of them girls, in Rotherham. The Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan – said to be the intellectual guru to Ukip’s Douglas Carswell – argued that “these children were victims of ‘anti-racism’”. In this he echoed much of the press commentary, seizing on a finding of the Jay inquiry that those who should have protected Rotherham’s young from predators of Pakistani heritage were instead cowed by fear of being branded racist. …
How much easier for police or council officials who had neglected their duty to blame the terrifying commissars of political correctness rather than admit they messed up. If that strikes me as plausible, it’s partly down to personal experience. Several years ago I witnessed an incident in the East End of London when an outdoor memorial service was disrupted by a handful of Asian men, who pelted the mainly elderly mourners present with vegetables and eggs. The police were called but insisted they could do nothing. One officer told those who’d been hit he’d like to go after the offenders but he couldn’t: “It’s the Human Rights Act.”
That sounds laughable now, so obviously an excuse for inaction. But I’d go further. In a subtle way, such a claim – and indeed similar invocations of political correctness – represent a kind of racism. For what is being implied when a council or police force say they cannot stop a ring of men raping children? … For what low opinion must you have of those of Pakistani heritage to think that they, or Muslims more widely, would be offended by the prospect of violent paedophiles facing justice for their crimes? Posing as cultural sensitivity, such a concern betrays contempt: by presuming they would stand by the abusers and torturers in their midst it damns an entire community for the vile behaviour of a few. (Rotherham inquiry: the ‘PC gone mad’ defence is itself a form of racism, The Guardian, 29th August 2014)
A year ago, I think that Danczuk would have been howled out of politics for speaking the truth like that. But he’s said even more:I’ve also had [Muslim] family members come to my [parliamentary] surgery asking me to make representations on behalf of brothers who have been found guilty of child sex abuse. When I refuse, I frequently receive a tirade of abuse. “These girls are prostitutes,” one man shouted at me, and warned that I would pay a heavy price for not supporting him. He’d get thousands of people not to vote for me. (Rotherham is not an isolated incident, The Daily Telegraph, 31st August 2014)
Rotherham: politics ‘imported from Pakistan’ fuelled sex abuse cover-up – MP
An unhealthy brand of politics “imported” from Pakistan is partly to blame for the cover-up of mass child abuse in Rotherham and other British cities, a campaigning MP has claimed. Simon Danczuk, who helped expose a pattern of grooming of white teenage girls by men from a Pakistani background in Rochdale, where he is the Labour MP, said a culture of intimidation and closing of ranks within parts of the Asian community had mired politics in towns and cities across northern England for years.
Mr Danczuk said the elements of Pakistani political culture itself were partly to blame for the cover-up. “There are cultural issues around the way politics are done in the Asian community which have to change,” he said. He said he had personally come under pressure from Asian councillors and members of the community for speaking out as well as being warned by prominent figures in his party.
He pointed to the way in which two Muslim councillors in Rochdale had provided character references for one of the perpetrators of the Rochdale abuse. “Politics are done differently in Pakistan, it is a cultural difference we have imported some of that into some of these northern towns and cities and I think we have to face up to the fact that we can’t carry on doing politics like that.
“It is not healthy and the direct consequence is that we end up having to tackle issues like has been faced in Rotherham.” He described it as “a looking after your own” within the Asian community which other politicians had accepted. “Pressure was applied, that’s what will have happened to Denis MacShane and he went along with it,” he said, referring to comments last week from the disgraced former MP for Rotherham who said he had shied away from the issue because he was a “Guardian reading liberal leftie”. (Rotherham: politics ‘imported from Pakistan’ fuelled sex abuse cover-up – MP, The Sunday Telegraph, 31st August 2014)
Friend of Rape #6: Hugh Muir
Hugh Muir is one of the Guardian’s prized Black journalists. When reality contradicts his ideology, he does the right thing and denies reality:
first? Hugh Muir doesn’t appear to read his own newspaper, which said this in February 2014: “Female genital mutilation (FGM) has been a crime in the UK since 1985. An estimated 65,000 girls aged 13 and under are at risk of mutilation. So why has there been a grand total of zero prosecutions?” (see here).Blaming the Rotherham abuse scandal on political correctness is ludicrous
The news from Rotherham becomes more horrific. Up to 1,400 children exploited and abused. And today we learn via an audit by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary that officers from South Yorkshire police – to whom many victims turned – were previously criticised by the police inspectorate for spending “a great deal of time trying to disprove victims’ allegations”. Little wonder so many victims felt they had to fend for themselves. …
But can it really be true – as the tabloids and the right robustly claim – that a significant contributor truly was political correctness; the fear of officials that by intervening appropriately in cases where the suspects were Pakistani Muslims, they themselves would be castigated as racist? If it is, it is outrageous. It is also ludicrous. …
If a backlash was feared, where would it have come from? There is no minority lobby for criminals and paedophiles. So long as communities knew the issue was one of law enforcement rather than an assault on those communities themselves, they would have supported tough action by the authorities. … In no other sphere does PC and its terrors prevent the authorities taking action against minorities. We’re over-represented in courts and prisons at one end of the social scale, overdisciplined and marginalised in the professions at the other. If it is true that political correctness prevented the authorities from using their powers against minorities for fear of giving offence, that’s a scandal. It would also be a first. (Blaming the Rotherham abuse scandal on political correctness is ludicrous, The Guardian, )
He may also have missed this, published in the Guardian in September: “The Home Office researcher … also said she had been accused of being insensitive when she told one official that most of the perpetrators were from Rotherham’s Pakistani community. A female colleague talked to her about the incident. ‘She said you must never refer to that again – you must never refer to Asian men. And her other response was to book me on a two-day ethnicity and diversity course to raise my awareness of ethnic issues.’” (see here).
And if Muir thinks there is “no minority lobby for criminals and paedophiles,” he needs to read what the Labour MP Simon Danczuk says about the “abuse” he receives from Muslims when he declines to make “representations on behalf of brothers who have been found guilty of child sex abuse” (see here and above).
Friend of Rape #7: Libby Brooks
While vibrant rape-gangs were hard at work in Rotherham, Oxford, Telford and many other British cities, Libby Brooks was hard at work too, denying reality and helping the crimes to continue:
Grooming and our ignoble tradition of racialising crime: Dubious claims about Muslim men grooming white girls hide legitimate worries about a system that fails victims of abuse
… the Times has marshalled evidence suggesting that these organised crimes are carried out almost exclusively by gangs of Pakistani Muslim origin who target white youngsters; and it quotes both police and agency sources who refer to a “conspiracy of silence” around the open investigation of such cases, amid fears of being branded racist or inflaming ethnic tensions in already precarious local environments. …
There is an ignoble tradition of racialising criminality in this country, in particular sexual offences, from the moral panic about West Indian pimps in the 1960s to the statistically dubious coverage of African-Caribbean gang rape in the 90s [she should have said “statistically damning”]. … The efforts of the Times to stand up this investigation are certainly considerable: selectively quoting or misquoting some groups, and inventing a category of “on-street grooming” that does not exist in law and was not recognised by any of the agencies I spoke to. It is also worth asking how responsible it is to provide ammunition to the violent racist extremists already active in these areas on such flawed evidence. (Grooming and our ignoble tradition of racialising crime, The Guardian, 7th January 2011)
Friend of Rape #8: Liz Fekete
Last but not least, we have the Jewish anti-fascist Liz Fekete, who has worked for decades to conceal the truth about vibrant crime and ensure that it continues. She wrote this in 2012:
The names listed above are the guilty Guardianistas: the traitors, liars and promoters of non-White murder, rape and corruption. But I think their day is ending. Those comments by Simon Danczuk about Pakistani corruption would have ended his career in the recent past. Not now. A Tory MP has publicly affirmed his belief that Enoch Powell was right to say mass immigration would end in disaster. That too would have been a career-killer in the recent past. Not now.Given the current climate, in which the far Right accuses the anti-racist lobby of imposing a conspiracy of silence about Muslim involvement in ‘on-street grooming’, I was quite surprised to see you similarly accuse the ‘left’ and anti-racists of being ‘too quick to try and silence any discussion’ and of turning a blind eye to the fact that the bulk of perpetrators of what you describe as ‘on-street grooming’ come from the British-Pakistani community. But what I really take issue with is your uncritical, and occasionally slanted, take on Ministry of Justice crime statistics.
There is, as you will know, a long history of racialising sex crimes in this country – Jews being associated with paedophilia in the 1930s, West Indians with pimping in the 1950s and now the focus has shifted to Muslim ‘groomers’ [on the contrary, I suggest that all these “racialisations” are accurate]. And statistics (just like attitude surveys) are not scientific and neutral but can be manipulated to suit an argument. … It recalled for me the time in the 1980s when the media and the fascists were creating the spectre of the ‘black mugger’ and the Metropolitan police added to the moral panic by isolating ‘assault or threat of violence upon a person, especially with intent to rob’ from all street crime and then providing the ethnicity of the perpetrators. Then, young African-Caribbean men were being accused of racially-motivated attacks on ‘little white old ladies’ in much the same way as Muslims as a whole are accused of anti-white sex crimes. (Grooming: an open letter to Nick Lowles, The Institute of Race Relations, 15th November 2012)
Instead, liberals are on the defensive, frantically lying and blowing smoke as they try to conceal the moral bankruptcy of their ideology and causes. There are more scandals like Rotherham to come and each new revelation will further expose liberals for what they are: promoters of hate and chaos, enemies of women and children, not friends and protectors. The Rotherham scandal has set a stake on the heart of the liberal vampire. Now history will begin to hammer it home.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
What a lot of leftist Jews don't understand is that by likening white anger towards these foreign rape gangs to nazi aggression to Jews, is that it will paralyze some guilty white liberals from getting active to save their children immigrant perverts. This will cause the more aware, more awake whites to hate not only liberalism more, but also Jews especially since a lot of Jews are leftist. The question is are Jews earning anti semitism when they make excuses for pedophile gangs that attack white children? Answer is yes. With the exception of a few Jews, most of them never look in the mirror and ask themselves why they are hated.
Here's another Jew that does not realize the harm she is doing by going along with the latest meme that we need to seperate pedophiles from molestors. Pedophiles have the urge but don't act on it. Despite her claims to sex positive relationships requiring consent on both sides, Margo jew Kaplan isn't helping.
This is her original article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here is someone writing about her article.
http://www.hngn.com/articles/44937/2014 ... s-says.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here is a quote:
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/child-sex-robo ... es-1457087" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Friend of Rape #2: Sue Berelowitz
Friend of Rape #5: Jonathan Freedland
Friend of Rape #8: Liz Fekete
Margo Kaplan
Here's my solution.
Here's another Jew that does not realize the harm she is doing by going along with the latest meme that we need to seperate pedophiles from molestors. Pedophiles have the urge but don't act on it. Despite her claims to sex positive relationships requiring consent on both sides, Margo jew Kaplan isn't helping.
This is her original article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opini ... .html?_r=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here is someone writing about her article.
http://www.hngn.com/articles/44937/2014 ... s-says.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Here is a quote:
Here she is in a youtube interview at 20 minute mark."Acknowledging that pedophiles have a mental disorder, and removing the obstacles to their coming forward and seeking help, is not only the right thing to do, but it would also advance efforts to protect children from harm."
Here is a quote from her in another article.Affirmative consent says you are not entitled to have sex with other people. It's not their responsibility to ward you off if they don't want to. It's your responsibility to take reasonable steps to ensure that you are on the same page as the person you are having sex with. So affirmative consent is very sex positive because it values sexual pleasure, it values sexual automony and agency. The concept is centered around a mutual desire to have sex. It encourages communication, desire and mutually sexually fulfilling relationships. And it values both parties' consent.
Treat them how? They never say. Don't worry. Another Jew has the answer. Make child sex robots.But you are basically saying, hey, let's take it easy on pedophiles.
Well, but I am not saying that about sex offenders. I say that they remain responsible for their conduct. We need to treat pedophiles before they offend. People see the word "pedophile" and think "sex offender." People choose to sex offend children. They do not choose to be pedophiles.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/child-sex-robo ... es-1457087" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Rehabilitate pedophiles? So we can cure pedophiles of sexual urges to children by giving them dolls that look like children? Not only does this feed the symptoms of the disorder, but the liberals contradict themselves because they always claim you can't cure or fix homosexuals and it would be bigoted to suggest otherwise. Continuing...Robotics experts at a recent robot ethics panel held at Berkeley, University of California have suggested that child sex robots could be introduced to help rehabilitate paedophiles.
[...]
I have a solution for molestors, pedophiles and those who rush to defend them, many of them Jewish."Child-like robots could be used for paedophiles the way methadone is used to treat drug addicts," Ron Arkin, Georgia Tech's Mobile Robot Lab director told the audience, according to Forbes.
"There are no presumptions that this will assuredly yield positive results – I only believe it is worth investigating in a controlled way to possibly provide better protection to society from recidivism in sex offenders. If we can save some children, I think it's a worthwhile project."
Arkin has previously mentioned this concept in the press and says that people who work with sex offenders have already expressed interest to him in researching these robots as a treatment tool.
Friend of Rape #2: Sue Berelowitz
Friend of Rape #5: Jonathan Freedland
Friend of Rape #8: Liz Fekete
Margo Kaplan
Here's my solution.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
In Mainz, Germany, a couple of years ago there was a real horrible case.
Three young Turks grabbed a 16 year old German girl and gang raped her. When they had finished they got a broken bottle and put it in her. She had to get a colostomy bag and will not be able to have children.
I can't understand why they would be so savage.
Three young Turks grabbed a 16 year old German girl and gang raped her. When they had finished they got a broken bottle and put it in her. She had to get a colostomy bag and will not be able to have children.
I can't understand why they would be so savage.
-
Tabula rasa
- Anti-Neocon novice
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 3:38 pm
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
Because feminism is gender marxism and a part of cultural marxism, which also includes racial marxism, commonly known as 'anti-racism'. People typically buy into the entire BS ideology, so feminists are usually 'anti-racists' as well.
Non-european immigrants are a marginalized victim group and cannot be criticised regardless of what any of them do.
http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of- ... rrectness/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
Non-european immigrants are a marginalized victim group and cannot be criticised regardless of what any of them do.
Re: Western Feminists silent on Muslim rape epidemics
http://therightstuff.biz/2015/10/06/somebodys-doing-it/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Somebody's Doing the Raping
Lawrence Murray Oct 06, 2015
That’s what the latest dispatch from occupied Germany says:
We told you so.
Somebody's Doing the Raping
Lawrence Murray Oct 06, 2015
That’s what the latest dispatch from occupied Germany says:
Based on the reaction of German feminists and charities, this is not the cultural enrichment that the left had intended; the narrative collision created by the transplantation of a literal rape culture into their own backyard is unnerving them. The Afro-Islamic Völkerwanderung will not make Europe a rainbow society of tolerance and diversity but simply regress it to the mean of the humanity it is replacing itself with.Germany's police union and women's rights groups accused the authorities on Tuesday of playing down reports of harassment, sexual assault and even rape at refugee shelters because they feared a backlash against asylum seekers... In a recent open letter, several charities alleged crimes had been committed a city shelter in the state. "There are several cases of rape and sexual assault and increasingly even reports on forced prostitution," the joint letter said, adding that these were not isolated incidents. With men accounting for about 70 percent of asylum seekers, other groups across the country have demanded gender-segregated accommodation and safe zones for women.
We told you so.
Buck the neocons. Fuck 'em too.