Where are you?

[haarp]

http://politicalcompass.org/test" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Some of the questions are really vague

[Phys]

My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74



Mine is pretty much what I thought it would be. Where is yours?

[haarp]

There wasn't an option to remove the money system and have technical people solve our problems without the need of a state.

[Int'l man of mystery]

My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74



Mine is pretty much what I thought it would be. Where is yours?

Mine is on the same row as yours, but 3 lines to the right.

[Phys]

haarp, I mean within the parameters that you posted.

Int'l man of mystery, I have always defined my position as libertarian marxist. It looks like you would be defined the same but with a little less objection to capitalism.

I think that test does a good job showing how Obama and Romney are nearly the exact same on economics. Its kind of funny listening to people defining Obama as a socialist or a commie.

[Ry]

they are both fascist

[haarp]

haarp, I mean within the parameters that you posted.

.

The parameters are nonsense, unverifiable babel, as with all political and economic theories you may as well try and get people to live like it says in the bible, "if only we could get honest people in govt". Until you view human beings objectively as possible, scientifically, as a mechanism, you can't overcome the issues. Humanists, femenists, socialists etc, they view things through a narrow unscientific perspective and they divide up the problems, constantly trying to promote their own group or issue, failing to understand that if you give one group special advantage you create inequality. There are no Jew problems, immigrant problems, Mexican problems etc, there are just human problems. Step one is studying behavioral science to learn about the human condition.

What is "honesty"? What is a "right"? Our language today is unverifiable, we still use 1000 year old terms to describe "love" even though no such thing exists. "hate, honesty, rights, mind, spirit" all nonsense. You aren't changing anything if you're promoting the political and money system, it out stands me that people think Marxist philosophy is "change", if Marx could come back he'd rewrite so much as he would never have been able to predict where we are today.

Some authors to look up: Stuart Chase, Thorstein Veblen, Jack Catran, B F Skinner, Arthur C Clarke, Buckminster Fuller, Alfred Korzybski, Jeremy Rifkin, James Harvey Robinson, H.G. Wells.

Good luck

[Phys]

You're a loon, haarp.

[Int'l man of mystery]

Int'l man of mystery, I have always defined my position as libertarian marxist. It looks like you would be defined the same but with a little less objection to capitalism.

That sounds about right.

[Zardoz]

Phys: You're a loon, haarp.

You just don't get it Phys. The corruption is so deep that in one sense using labels to identify with is useless unless there is a common core of the sociopathy that exists in our paradigm. And if you don't know of the sociopathy you are creating more division with your labels.

So with that said, I am human…