Anti-Neocons Forum

Ry wrote:

"Over a MILLION Iraqis dead".

Why is there such a huge discrepancy on how many Iraqis have died. Where does one find an accurate, "official" number. I've read where 100K Iraqis have been killed, for example.

I'm going point by point, that which I find of pertinence to me but why ask Holder to establish anything with respect to holding anyone accountable for anything including financial crimes/fraud when his AG is suspect in the first place.

If he had any balls/scruples/respect for law/intention to prosecute financial criminals, he should start with hiring William Black who is passionate about it and has done it effectively before.

Where does one find an accurate, "official" number.

"Official" AND accurate? Hmmm, I don't know if there is such a thing.

But I do remember one scientific assessment from a few (several?) years ago that had quite a big number. My memory isn't what it used to be, but The Lancet and 600,000 deaths seem to remain in my head.

Must be much higher now. And the DU and other nasties will cause problems for decades, at least.

As far as Obama/Hillary and the occupy movement, I defer to this constantly:

Doronjo wrote:

Where does one find an accurate, "official" number.

"Official" AND accurate? Hmmm, I don't know if there is such a thing.

But I do remember one scientific assessment from a few (several?) years ago that had quite a big number. My memory isn't what it used to be, but The Lancet and 600,000 deaths seem to remain in my head.

Must be much higher now. And the DU and other nasties will cause problems for decades, at least.

Depleted Uranium deaths are sometimes instant in child birth defects (see: Dr Dahlia Wasfi's works) but yes, many are delayed deaths and will occur over years.

Depleted Uranium deaths are a fucking travesty to the soldiers who go and fight these wars in a same way that the illnesses and deaths of first responders to 9/11 are.

Official and accurate are oxymorons when we're talking about truth and justice for people who go into a fight with best intentions these days.

...and anotha one

pro-Gentile wrote:

Doronjo wrote:

Where does one find an accurate, "official" number.

"Official" AND accurate? Hmmm, I don't know if there is such a thing.

But I do remember one scientific assessment from a few (several?) years ago that had quite a big number. My memory isn't what it used to be, but The Lancet and 600,000 deaths seem to remain in my head.

Must be much higher now. And the DU and other nasties will cause problems for decades, at least.

Depleted Uranium deaths are sometimes instant in child birth defects (see: Dr Dahlia Wasfi's works) but yes, many are delayed deaths and will occur over years.

Depleted Uranium deaths are a fucking travesty to the soldiers who go and fight these wars in a same way that the illnesses and deaths of first responders to 9/11 are.

Official and accurate are oxymorons when we're talking about truth and justice for people who go into a fight with best intentions these days.

Dr Dahlia Wasfi:

pro-Gentile wrote:

pro-Gentile wrote:

Doronjo wrote:

Where does one find an accurate, "official" number.

"Official" AND accurate? Hmmm, I don't know if there is such a thing.

But I do remember one scientific assessment from a few (several?) years ago that had quite a big number. My memory isn't what it used to be, but The Lancet and 600,000 deaths seem to remain in my head.

Must be much higher now. And the DU and other nasties will cause problems for decades, at least.

Depleted Uranium deaths are sometimes instant in child birth defects (see: Dr Dahlia Wasfi's works) but yes, many are delayed deaths and will occur over years.

Depleted Uranium deaths are a fucking travesty to the soldiers who go and fight these wars in a same way that the illnesses and deaths of first responders to 9/11 are.

Official and accurate are oxymorons when we're talking about truth and justice for people who go into a fight with best intentions these days.

Dr Dahlia Wasfi:

This one's going to haunt America forever. Actually, this one is going to haunt everyone forever.

pro-Gentile wrote:

pro-Gentile wrote:

pro-Gentile wrote:

Doronjo wrote:

Where does one find an accurate, "official" number.

"Official" AND accurate? Hmmm, I don't know if there is such a thing.

But I do remember one scientific assessment from a few (several?) years ago that had quite a big number. My memory isn't what it used to be, but The Lancet and 600,000 deaths seem to remain in my head.

Must be much higher now. And the DU and other nasties will cause problems for decades, at least.

Depleted Uranium deaths are sometimes instant in child birth defects (see: Dr Dahlia Wasfi's works) but yes, many are delayed deaths and will occur over years.

Depleted Uranium deaths are a fucking travesty to the soldiers who go and fight these wars in a same way that the illnesses and deaths of first responders to 9/11 are.

Official and accurate are oxymorons when we're talking about truth and justice for people who go into a fight with best intentions these days.

Dr Dahlia Wasfi:

This one's going to haunt America forever. Actually, this one is going to haunt everyone forever.

That's my boy right there.