Current events, politics, and more.
-
Ed
- Smashing neocons
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm
- Location: South Korea
Post
by Ed » Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:35 am
Diogenes wrote:so basically, after phillip zack did the anthrax attacks, PNAC decided to put a spin on it with this lie
and why did you say that the claim was that atta gave anthrax to iraq, didn't it make more sense the other way around?
and what were the dates of the letters? i read something elsewhere that it was meant to coincide with 9/11 but was delayed?
Sorry i've written it the wrong way round. it was reported as Iraqis giving Atta some anthrax. Ry has the London Times article in the first post. Anyway, the story is all false, this has been confirmed.
The first letter was post-stamped 18 September.
our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.
-
Diogenes
- Anti-Neocon novice
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 9:12 pm
Post
by Diogenes » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:53 pm
what does it mean 'post-stamped' september 18?
do we have evidence that links PNAC to phillip zack and the anthrax attacks other than this POST-claim of the anthrax attacks?
-
Ry
- Super Anti-Neocon
- Posts: 34472
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
- Location: Japan
-
Contact:
Post
by Ry » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:29 pm
doesn't matter if the report about Prague was after. The report on Prague came out Sep 18th the Israelis expanded on the lie about the meeting and said oh and Atta also got anthrax from Iraqis and then the Neocons built upon that lie with another lie saying Saddam had mobile weapons labs with anthrax and VX gas. etc then aother lie and another lie it kept going. It was obviously a well planned string of propaganda. Then a month later 2002 Israel got busted running a fake al qaeda cell!
Zack also sent word of the anthrax letters to the justice department BEFORE news of the anthrax so he fucked up bad.
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
Ry
- Super Anti-Neocon
- Posts: 34472
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
- Location: Japan
-
Contact:
Post
by Ry » Mon May 13, 2013 11:16 am
you see how closely al qaeda and israel work together in syria and it become all that much more obvious
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
Ry
- Super Anti-Neocon
- Posts: 34472
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
- Location: Japan
-
Contact:
Post
by Ry » Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:59 am
bump
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
GLobal
- Anti-Neocon novice
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 9:33 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Post
by GLobal » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:31 pm
what was this linking to?
-
Ry
- Super Anti-Neocon
- Posts: 34472
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
- Location: Japan
-
Contact:
Post
by Ry » Fri Sep 18, 2015 8:09 am
https://web.archive.org/web/20100713032 ... 0918nn.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
youll have to find the one by reuters
but it said
"recent intelligence information received by the United States showed Atta had met with a representative of Iraqi intelligence this year". The report cited "U.S. government sources"
That government source was James Woolsey former DCI
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
Ry
- Super Anti-Neocon
- Posts: 34472
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
- Location: Japan
-
Contact:
Post
by Ry » Tue Nov 03, 2015 6:47 pm
Who lied about the anthrax?
An Israeli cabal
Who lied about the War in Iraq?
An Israeli cabal.
Who was arrested on 911?
An Israeli cabal.
Who was arrested after 911
An Israeli cabal.
Who had illegal access to the towers and got arrested and indicted?
An Israel cabal.
Who benefits the most from a war on terrorism/Islam?
Israelis.
So who did 911?
Aliens.
...Sigh
Get The Empire Unmasked here