Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:57 am
wars are no longer for aparticular resource. The war is the resource. The Big Oil companies have actually been against this war Greg Plast wrote a good book abouti t.
The official forum of ancreport.com
https://www.ancreport.com/forum/
I've seen articles where he makes that point.Ry wrote:wars are no longer for aparticular resource. The war is the resource. The Big Oil companies have actually been against this war Greg Plast wrote a good book abouti t.
Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep a lid on Iraq's oil production -- limiting Iraq's oil pumping to the tight quota set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.
There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil -- not to get more of Iraq's oil, but to prevent Iraq producing too much of it.
http://www.gregpalast.com/bush-didnt-bu ... you-fools/
Good point about how war is the resource too. I wish the talking heads and other media types would make that point to larger audiences. I won't hold my breath on that one, though.The oil majors had a better use for Iraq's oil than drilling it - not drilling it. The oil bigs had bought Iraq's concession to seal it up and keep it off the market. To please his buyers' wishes, Mr. 5% spread out a big map of the Middle East on the floor of a hotel room in Belgium and drew a thick red line around the gulf oil fields, centered on Iraq. All the oil company executives, gathered in the hotel room, signed their name on the red line - vowing not to drill, except as a group, within the red-lined zone. No one, therefore, had an incentive to cheat and take red-lined oil. All of Iraq's oil, sequestered by all, was locked in, and all signers would enjoy a lift in worldwide prices. Anglo-Persian Company, now British Petroleum (BP), would pump almost all its oil, reasonably, from Persia (Iran). Later, the Standard Oil combine, renamed the Arabian-American Oil Company (Aramco), would limit almost all its drilling to Saudi Arabia. Anglo-Persian (BP) had begun pulling oil from Kirkuk, Iraq, in 1927 and, in accordance with the Red-Line Agreement, shared its Kirkuk and Basra fields with its IPC group - and drilled no more.
http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/ ... i/61/20480
Not to mention the prevention of organized/concentrated resistance against Israeli occupation.NoApartheid wrote:Nah its about controlling the resources for the Zionists in Turkey, Israel, Azerbaijan and more so they all get their natural resources...
The "war on terror" is fraudulent. The cruel war and the deceptive vocabulary that protects it are a cover for expanding US and Israeli hegemony in the Middle East and for constructing a functioning police state at home. A country in which people cannot make airline reservations without the government's permission is not a free country.
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts10252007.html
Bush has made the US into a colony of Israel. The US is incurring massive debt and loss of both life and reputation in order to silence Muslim opposition to Israel’s theft of Palestine and the Golan Heights. That is what the “war on terror” is about.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e16175.htm
Yah that's right, essentially more or less its just a land grab. The Zionists and Christian Zionist supporters expel people off their lands, tell them they can't come back, give the contracts over to Turkish and Israeli firms who make the same amount of money off their projects everywhere & then incorporate it into the tax reports.Not to mention the prevention of organized/concentrated resistance against Israeli occupation.
Spot on (and a great phrase, that I stole and used in a debate yesterday evening, and will do again tonight). This concept is difficult for most of the population to grasp.Ry wrote:wars are no longer for aparticular resource. The war is the resource. The Big Oil companies have actually been against this war Greg Plast wrote a good book abouti t.