Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:34 am
What is your personal analysis so far in a few short paragraphs
without that, the 10 seconds I spent already is to much...hehe
without that, the 10 seconds I spent already is to much...hehe
The official forum of ancreport.com
https://www.ancreport.com/forum/
Aaron wrote:that site, is just aweful. their webmaster is amateur at best. that article has no author signature, and also no sourcing. also, it's not like the page is even specific. i mean, it should be something like "palestine.htm" or something, instead, it is "history.htm" right on the root of the site. gee bob. that sends the message to me that the site is generalizing this situation into general history. it is unsourced, unsigned, unprofessional, and unreliable.
i wouldn't think it wouldn't take much more than just reading that page to know it's biased, pro-zionist propaganda. unless of course you are a zionist in which case you might hold that as some sort of good literary material, it's not, and i would hope that all non-zionists with more than a few working brain cells could figure that out.
use our forum search here, and search for the word 'palestine'. spend some time reading, palestine's been talked about a lot here and there are a lot of source links spread across many threads. look for ry's busy threads you might find what you're looking for quicker.
don't use the search word 'israel' or 'zionist' because that will pull up a ton more info that will just take you longer to find out what you're really looking for.
i'd suggest using a search engine also, but that too can be tedious, as the subject is commonly buried under a lot of other shit, and hard to find.
however, i'd like to also point out, t hat palestine hasn't got any real hard documented information as far as from officials, the only "official" documents you can find are of course in favor of the people with the most wealth and power, the zionists. their false information is far more widely propagated while information from palestinian officials is suppressed.
the winner of wars is always the one who gets to write (their version) of the history about the wars (or conflicts). so it should be no surprise then that the "mainstream" version of event histories was created and passed down to them by the victors of said conflict. with book burnings and evidence destruction and censorship, finding information provided by the losing side of the conflict becomes rare.
Silly CDN wrote: can you debunk this further!
... also, can you put that into smaller words and text it to my cell phone?!Silly CDN wrote: can you debunk this further!
Ry wrote:CDN learn how to think for yourself.