Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
all the changes we made to the site got reversed back to months ago it was part of getting it back online.
Get The Empire Unmasked here
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
that's true to some extent..but lets not act as if there is no such thing as white privilegeAxe Kick wrote:I'll say it again. The White people at the top of heap don't give a f*ck about the common White person.Int'l man of mystery wrote:Every group is a "minority" in some context. However, the concept of "superiority" in this context, isn't about the numbers, but about privilege.Axe Kick wrote:You just completely ignored what I said and went into your little diatribe.
If there is a system in place to makes Whites superior, then why are Whites on track to be minorities EVERYWHERE. Use some logic.
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
Axe Kick wrote:Picture released which shows the back of Zimmerman's head before he was cleaned up at the scene.
http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_geor ... _wmain.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and what does this prove except that he was in a fight....also the littlest of cuts( to the head) will bleed out like you were shot..
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
white people? there is another group that have even more privilege so lets look at some facts, on topic.Political Assasin wrote:white people have a whole justice system working to keep them out of harms way. They have a million Al Sharptons working to keep them on top at any given moment.
Is George Zimmerman Jewish?
By Adam Bilzerian
One would think the mainstream media would have very little airtime to spend on the George Zimmerman shooting considering that a global economic debt crisis and a potential war in Iran are looming. Even worse yet, the media has decided to focus it’s attention on George Zimmerman’s race, which is absolutely disgraceful. A teenager lost his life because an aggressive young adult could not mind his own business. And while this is a terrible tragedy, it should not be the focus of an entire nation. Whether or not Zimmerman is Jewish, white, black, green, or yellow should be the last thing on most American’s minds right now. Even more strange is the media’s zeal to paint Trayvon Martin’s killer as anything but Jewish. The Tablet, a Jewish newspaper, recently published an article about Zimmerman’s non-Jewishness. The Tablet based its article on a Washington Post article titled “Who is George Zimmerman,” which asserted that Zimmerman was a half-white, half-latino Catholic. Many have assumed that Zimmerman’s father is Jewish because of his last name, and that assertion is somewhat validated by the fact that non-Jewish Zimmermans usually spell their name with two n’s rather than the one n George has. Rather than ask Zimmerman or his father about their race, the media seems quite content to refer to George as white or Latino.
Regardless of whether Zimmerman’s father is Jewish or not, this issue leads to some more fundamental questions that our society should consider. For starters, do Jewish people get more leniency for their crimes than gentiles? In Zimmerman’s case, it does appear that powerful connections were used to subvert his arrest. In general though, non-gentile people are far wealthier than other Americans, with 33% of all American millionaires being Jewish, 40% of all billionaires, and 50% of the 20 wealthiest Americans. Statistically speaking, since non-gentile people only comprise 2% of the American population, the vast majority of Jewish people are wealthy. Therefore, non-gentiles inevitably have better lawyers and know more judges and politicians who can thwart investigations and reduce sentences than their gentile counterparts. Take the case of Mark Rich for example. Rich fled the country after being indicted for tax-evasion and illegally trading with Iran. While on the run, Rich was featured on the FBI’s top ten most wanted list for a number of years before being pardoned by Clinton. An investigation of the pardon later revealed that Rich’s wife gave significant sums of money to the Democratic Party.
Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the FBI arrested 5 men who were seen filming the planes hitting the twin towers and then dancing in celebration afterwards. These men failed lie detector tests when questioned on why they were there and what role they had in the attacks. It turns out that the five dancing Israelis, as they were later known, were actually Israeli Mossad agents who were part of an elaborate spy ring that had infiltrated America. If these men had been anything other than Jewish, they would have been shipped off to an undisclosed CIA prison in Syria or Poland and water boarded until they gave up every piece of intelligence they had. Instead, these men were quietly released back to Israel without even an espionage charge. They later admitted on a Israeli talk show that they were there to document the event; meaning that they either had knowledge the event was going to take place beforehand and did not warn the US or had a hand in planning it.
In yet another example, in 2005, two Jewish American AIPAC executives were caught red-handed stealing American military secrets to give to Israel. After some political wrangling, all charges were dropped against the two Jewish AIPAC executives in 2009, even though the government had overwhelming evidence to prosecute. It was later reported by Time magazine that Jane Harman, a Jewish congresswoman, was bribed by AIPAC to lobby the Department of Justice to drop the spying charges against the executives. In 2009, CQ politics reported that Harman was caught on a NSA wiretap telling an Israeli agent that she would lobby the Department of Justice to drop the case.
As of the present day, not one Jewish banker or mortgage broker has been charged for their role in the 2008 financial crisis. This is highly unusual as the SEC, FBI, and IRS almost always find someone or some group to indict for financial collapses that measure even one-tenth of the size. The fact that the SEC and IRS are both headed by Jewish people, in conjunction with 90% of the American media being owned or controlled by Jewish Americans, may help to explain the lack of indictments. (Proof of the preceding statement: http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=1090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
The next question that should be posed is, “How does our society deal with a new culture of non-gentile racism that is plaguing America today?” As Kevin McDonald, a California State University professor, concluded, “These data strongly suggest that Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities has nothing to do with IQ but with discrimination against non-Jewish White Americans….It would be interesting to see the dynamics of the admissions process. How many admissions officers are Jewish? And, whether or not they are Jewish,what pressures are they under to admit Jewish students?” To answer his question, 12-35% of the Ivy League student population are Jewish and nearly 80% of the people in the top administrative positions are either Jewish or married to Jewish people. The following link provides the names and tittles of the Ivy League administrators to prove this point: http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=331" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Unfortunately, this racism extends far beyond just the overrepresentation of non-gentile people in top universities. Financial firms, government appointments, and media positions also display similar statistics of non-gentile overrepresentation caused by lobbying, nepotism, and tribalism. (See the following articles for a detailed analysis: http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=1090" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=331" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;,)
In addition, there seems to be a fundamental lack of respect for gentile human rights in the powerful Israeli lobby, which has pushed for foreign policy objectives like the Iraq war that led to the murder of a million innocent gentiles and the loss of resources that could have been used to help people. Much of the Israeli lobby in America staunchly supports Israeli apartheid and the human rights abuses of the Palestinian people.
Most Americans are unaware of the historical racism that non-gentile people have towards blacks. The following article outlines this racism, which dates back to the non-gentile domination of the North American slave trade and carries forward to Israel denying black Jews entry into Israel and currently treating black Ethiopians Jews in Israel as second class citizens. (http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=745" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) If Zimmerman’s father is Jewish, then we have to ask ourselves if the shooting was brought on by racist tendencies learned from his father’s side of the family? Perhaps this case can bring some media attention to institutionalized non-gentile racism in America, and finally allow it to be combatted.
The last question we must address is, “How do we classify non-gentile people in terms of their race?” Since America uses race for affirmative action and many other measures, it is quite important to establish a uniform classification system so as not to create any unequal advantage. In terms of school admissions and affirmative action measures, non-gentile people are often lumped into the white category, which means that their incredible overrepresentation in top universities, media positions, and powerful financial firms leads to underrepresentation and discrimination against white gentiles.
In the past, the media has been guilty of classifying Jewish people as Jewish when the stories are positive and white when they’re negative. The media’s eagerness to refer to Zimmerman as white or latino rather than Jewish typifies this point. All the media would have had to do to sort this out was ask Zimmerman’s father if he was Jewish, but they didn’t. In a better society, the shooters race would be irrelevant, but since the media focused in on race immediately, they should at least endeavor to get the facts straight.
http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=1171
All Politics is a Meme War
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
It proves that he had injuries that are consistent with his story. Kind of flies in the face of those using those grainy police videos to say, "LOOK HE HAD NO INJURIES!"bigAL11 wrote:Axe Kick wrote:Picture released which shows the back of Zimmerman's head before he was cleaned up at the scene.
http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_geor ... _wmain.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and what does this prove except that he was in a fight....also the littlest of cuts( to the head) will bleed out like you were shot..
Also, some other goodies that came out from the bond hearing http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2 ... ction.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This disproves those saying that Zimmmeran shot Martin from a distance when Martin was no longer on top of him.A few new pieces of evidence did come out Friday.
How close, asked the judge, was the gun to the victim when it was fired?
So close, said Gilbreath, that there were burns on Trayvon's sweat shirt and skin.
Ouch.“Do you know who started the fight?” Mr. O’Mara asked Mr. Gilbreath.
“Do I know?” Mr. Gilbreath said. “No.”
Mr. O’Mara then asked Mr. Gilbreath if the state had any evidence to contradict Mr. Zimmerman’s statement to the police that he had been making his way back to his car when he was punched by Mr. Martin. Mr. Zimmerman told investigators he shot Mr. Martin in self-defense after Mr. Martin banged his head on concrete, covered his nose and mouth and reached for his gun.
Mr. Gilbreath responded, “No.”
Re: Zimmerman is going to be charged with Murder
Actually it doesnt prove his story...it just proves that he had cuts on the back of his head..it doesnt prove martin tracked him down and beat him up.... furthermore according to your link martin supposedly covered zimmermans nose and mouth while reaching for the guy...hmm how was zimmerman screaming from help and it not sound muffled???....also I could have sworn martin was found dead in the grass....so what was martin banging zimmermans head on that made it bleed....maybe peebles in the grass?lol but really where is the crime scene pics of blood on the sidewalk or did they just forget to take that?Axe Kick wrote:It proves that he had injuries that are consistent with his story. Kind of flies in the face of those using those grainy police videos to say, "LOOK HE HAD NO INJURIES!"bigAL11 wrote:Axe Kick wrote:Picture released which shows the back of Zimmerman's head before he was cleaned up at the scene.
http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_geor ... _wmain.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and what does this prove except that he was in a fight....also the littlest of cuts( to the head) will bleed out like you were shot..
Also, some other goodies that came out from the bond hearing http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2 ... ction.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This disproves those saying that Zimmmeran shot Martin from a distance when Martin was no longer on top of him.A few new pieces of evidence did come out Friday.
How close, asked the judge, was the gun to the victim when it was fired?
So close, said Gilbreath, that there were burns on Trayvon's sweat shirt and skin.
Ouch.“Do you know who started the fight?” Mr. O’Mara asked Mr. Gilbreath.
“Do I know?” Mr. Gilbreath said. “No.”
Mr. O’Mara then asked Mr. Gilbreath if the state had any evidence to contradict Mr. Zimmerman’s statement to the police that he had been making his way back to his car when he was punched by Mr. Martin. Mr. Zimmerman told investigators he shot Mr. Martin in self-defense after Mr. Martin banged his head on concrete, covered his nose and mouth and reached for his gun.
Mr. Gilbreath responded, “No.”