Store updated

[R4F1]

he lives pretty far away

You could go on a skype session or something.

[Ry]

I dont really like him

[R4F1]

I dont really like him

That's surprising, and why's that?

[Ry]

Because he plays neutral on everything including the extremely kooky like earthquake machines and a missile hitting the pentagon. And he and Sibel were going around after the Boston bombing acting like it was a trade off to Russia to back off US support for Chechens if Russia would back off of Syria and that the US would invade in days. I was saying no way. ( I was right) but I got over shadowed because Sibel and James are super tight because he just rolls over to any and everything she says. He's a perfect yes-mam. The guy is basically the master of google with a nice camera and set up but I don't think I can learn anything from him analysis-wise. He just waits to see what everyone else says and then repeats it with a nice newsy format. We met in a Bar and all he drank was water and stood in the corner all awkward.

[R4F1]

Because he plays neutral on everything including the extremely kooky like earthquake machines and a missile hitting the pentagon. And he and Sibel were going around after the Boston bombing acting like it was a trade off to Russia to back off US support for Chechens if Russia would back off of Syria and that the US would invade in days. I was saying no way. ( I was right) but I got over shadowed because Sibel and James are super tight because he just rolls over to any and everything she says. He's a perfect yes-mam.

I don't think he's that neutral on issues, he does have certain opinions which he actively promotes (anti-globalism, and now recently anarchism; he's also against nuclear power for some reason). However, he does like to present things in a clam and neutral way, thats why people like him. He doesn't try to "indoctrinate" you, but merely "presents" a view which most people end up consequently accepting or respecting. i think there's something to learn from that.

As for the Boston Bombing, i don't think it was a trade-off per se. But the Russians did try to use the event as a way of demonizing Chechens (when in reality the Tsarnaev's are innocent so far), and the Chechens historically have been oppressed (the terrorism is Blowback of that oppression).

The guy is basically the master of google with a nice camera and set up but I don't think I can learn anything from him analysis-wise. He just waits to see what everyone else says and then repeats it with a nice newsy format. We met in a Bar and all he drank was water and stood in the corner all awkward.

You need to up your production either way. You know, otherwise its only hurting you and the amount of people you reach. Maybe he doesn't drink alcohol, you guys should have met somewhere else, some people are just introverts, even me to some degree. But atleast he's doing interviews with people, which you haven't been; I'm not dissing you, but you need better promotion.

[Ry]

I dont have the money to up my production more than I did for the new film. I am not impressed by a person being calm. Im calm all the time. Being neutral on the missile hitting the pentagon and or earthquake machines and believing in the Illuminati and all of that makes him kooky in my book. He's never said a thing I didn't already know or say myself. Boston was not a false flag. There is no way the US would use Chechens who they supposed as patsies to kill Americans. One of their own privateers went rouge and that was that.

[Ry]

The new site is coming along.

[mdinno]

This is awesome!!

[Rena]

You mention books in the store, this I am most interested in. I do not like e-books, just old fashion hold in my hand books.

[Sleight of Mind]

Are there any anti-drone t-shirts in black?