Biden busted

[Ry]

Are you that god damn dense?

Im not talking abut Biden's English. You dont get it. It doesn't matter if he was talking about the bills or the Republicans because HE VOTED FRO BOTH FUCKING WARS ETC.

Secondly YOUR English was wrong by saying "Neither of them doesn't like." It's "neither of them like," not doesn't like, idiot.


Thus Biden was busted because he implied it was Ryan's fault for voting for these things which caused the massive debt when Biden voted for the same god damn things.

[Epinoia]

Are you that god damn dense?

Im not talking abut Biden's English. You dont get it. It doesn't matter if he was talking about the bills or the Republicans because HE VOTED FRO BOTH FUCKING WARS ETC.

Secondly YOUR English was wrong by saying "Neither of them doesn't like." It's "neither of them like," not doesn't like, idiot.


Thus Biden was busted because he implied it was Ryan's fault for voting for these things which caused the massive debt when Biden voted for the same god damn things.

The same god damn things? WRONG. You seem to be conveniently and consistently missing that last part -- the tax cut for the rich -- the thing (singular) REFERENCED by the final 'THAT' (rather than 'THOSE') in his quote. You know -- the tax cuts which you included in the quote, but NOT in the 5 items listed beneath in the picture.

As for my English -- I had originally placed only Ryan in there, but then went in and added Ryan and Romney. In fact, you're wrong in your criticism above -- because it's NOT "Neither...like" -- It's "Neither (Romney nor Ryan) LIKES". 'Neither' is a singular. Regardless, I admitted that I had an editing error. I am capable of making and admitting a mistake. Unfortunately, it appears you are not. Perhaps it's because you're too busy calling people 'jackasses' and now 'dense idiots'?

Factually and grammatically, Biden is correct -- and that's my point. He didn't say that he didn't vote for all of 'THOSE' things. He said that he didn't vote for 'THAT' (which is a singular) thing -- the FINAL thing in the list...the tax cuts. Was it confusing? Yes. Was it misleading? Obviously. Was it intentionally misleading? Possibly. But in the final analysis, what he said was TRUE.

[Tim]

Is there really a point to arguing about this? I mean, we can list dozens of things Obama and Biden have done that were on par/worse than what Bush's admin did, like authorizing more drone strikes in Pakistan. Or bailing out the auto industry. Or outsourcing just as many jobs overseas. Etc.

[Epinoia]

Is there really a point to arguing about this? I mean, we can list dozens of things Obama and Biden have done that were on par/worse than what Bush's admin did, like authorizing more drone strikes in Pakistan. Or bailing out the auto industry. Or outsourcing just as many jobs overseas. Etc.

It's difficult to argue that he shouldn't be using drones -- you place yourself in the position of arguing that we should be placing the lives of pilots in danger, rather than inanimate machines. We shouldn't be there in the first place. But that's difficult to argue when you have a population that has been led to believe #1) that Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, and #2) that Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan.

As for bailing out the auto industry -- I respectfully disagree. Auto production lines are a national security asset. They can be quickly modified to produce military vehicles should we find ourselves at war with China and/or Russia -- which does seem to be on the globalist's agenda long-term.

As for outsourcing the jobs -- not sure... It seems to me that corporations are far more responsible for that dastardly deed than the president. We could certainly help stop it with some punitive tariffs, though. But that's considered blasphemy in the so-called global economy. Rivero is entirely correct when he says that we mostly 'stopped making products for money', and started to 'make money the product'. We put ourselves in a terrible position now that far fewer people want or need our money internationally. When CEOs sit down and calculate profit and loss, they have a clear value of how much money they can save in labor costs by shipping jobs overseas. But their calculus NEVER includes the loss in sales that they'll incur because of the loss of effective customers they cause with their firings here at home. They're shooting themselves in the collective foot, because they don't know how to measure such an impact.

I'm in a solidly red state. So there's really no point in my voting for anyone other than Ron Paul -- which is effectively just a protest vote. Unless something majorly changes, it does look like Obama is going to get back in so long as he wins Ohio. With things as they are now, Ohio gives him 271 of 270 needed electoral votes. Whereas Romney not only needs to take Ohio, but most of the other toss-up states as well.

[Tim]

I think you missed my point. I realize you're new here and I don't always agree with Ry myself but there's really no point in arguing over whether or not Biden was right about one thing. When he was wrong about so many other more important issues. 'They' (elite, Zionists, globalists, whatever) love to see people who are informed arguing amongst themselves. Divide and conquer. They love it. Look at Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. They love when countries stay fighting over trivial bullshit while they continue to loot it blind. Rather than argue, let's put together our common goals and work from there. And yeah, sometimes newbies here get insulted or mocked but that's how Ry's always been. He's been dealing with a LOT of dumb people commenting on his videos ever since he started making them so I can't blame him for getting frustrated. He tries to sell the truth without the Illuminatifreemasonrynazisoccult conspiracy theories that poison the well and avoid real issues at hand. It's difficult when so many 'truth' activists are blind to it and want to argue about it. Focus on what we agree on, that's all.

[Ry]

New or old it doesn't matter. Because Biden DID vote for the things that helped increase the debt such as the wars, and the bailouts. And by the way Obama Kept the Bush Tax Cuts anyway but he did not keep the Bush tax rebates for the poor. At least Bush passed out some 300 and 600 dollar checks to the poor and middle class. Obama/Biden got rid of the tax rebate and just continued the tax cuts.

* In 2008 when Bush left the average income for people in the "making over 50 million a year" bracket which is the highest tax bracket there is were averaging 91.2 million.

By 2009 under Obama that number shot up to 518.8 million. They increased their income five times over in just a year. That's also about 10 million dollars week.

* Wallstreet CEOs dragged in 149 Billion in 2010 that was after wasting our money and getting bailed out from both Obama and the Fed.

* Obama spent more money in 8 months than Bush did in 8 years and Bush spent more than all other presidents before him put together.

The AIG bailout alone was 183.2 billion dollars. That's all the direct aid to Israel for 61 years.