Ralph Nader poll

Current events, politics, and more.

IF all men had an even chance at winning, who would you have voted for to be president?

Bush
0
No votes
Kerry
0
No votes
Nader
22
100%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
Estranged
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:31 pm

Post by Estranged » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:02 am

Corey Michael wrote:
Terrorcell wrote:I thought Nadar had Bonesmen in his campaign party?
Ralph Nader's Lawyer Donald Etra, Joined the Skull & Bones secret
society in 1968 the same year that George W. Bush joined ? !
Thats fucked. Crazy to think even he was controlled being that he never had a chance. Has he ever made a statement or been asked about this?

User avatar
Terrorcell
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 9:12 am
Location: On the Departmen of Homeland Security's "Watchlist"

Post by Terrorcell » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:52 am

Corey Michael wrote:
Terrorcell wrote:I thought Nadar had Bonesmen in his campaign party?
Ralph Nader's Lawyer Donald Etra, Joined the Skull & Bones secret
society in 1968 the same year that George W. Bush joined ? !

That's what I thought. They gave us Nadar to attempt to give us the illusion of choice.

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by Ry » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:52 am

How can he be controlled when all Nader does is point out what is wrong with both major parties, takes a stand against zionism and corporatism the cia the war on drugs and everything else the neocons stand for. Nader has been fighting them for over 40 years.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

User avatar
Dissent
Anti-Neocon Patrol
Posts: 4207
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by Dissent » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:59 am

the illuminati is fake. :roll:

User avatar
Estranged
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:31 pm

Post by Estranged » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:03 am

Ry wrote:How can he be controlled when all Nader does is point out what is wrong with both major parties, takes a stand against zionism and corporatism the cia the war on drugs and everything else the neocons stand for. Nader has been fighting them for over 40 years.
It may be more accurate to say his campaign was infiltrated.

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by Ry » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:25 am

I think it is more accurate to say that the disinformation worked because they were afraid of Nader. One thing the followers of either party were unified on was hating Ralph Nader.

He ran as an Independent he left the Green party because of its coruption. I never hear anyone debate him on the issues. it is also a character assult.

What was wrong with his ISSUES I want to know. Can anyone go against him on the issues? or is it just about "stealing votes" which no one is entitled to to begin with in a democratic republic. Just how did Nader ever say anything that helped the cons?

They are so lucky he was not given air time in the debates like other third party candidates got such as Ross Perott, because Ralph Nader would have destroyed them.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

User avatar
Terrorcell
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 9:12 am
Location: On the Departmen of Homeland Security's "Watchlist"

Post by Terrorcell » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:38 am

I have to question everyone for starters, and I especially go out my way when it comes to individuals who are tied to Bonesmen. Perhaps somehow Nadar was unaware that he had been infiltrated, perhaps he was a schill, perhaps his campaign was "A" but had he actually been elected he would have given us "B".

I mean let's face the facts, 2 Bonesmen run against each other and the 3rd option has Bonesmen Lawyer helping him plot out his "strategy".

That doesn't make you question things?

ROBBIN51777
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:46 pm

Post by ROBBIN51777 » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:49 am

I voted for Nader before I was even awakened! Ralph was actually the candidate that inspired me to get involved/interested in politics and my community. If you research his past and view his issues (votenader.org) you can not only learn a lot from him but respect what he has done with his life. He's the man!

flanker12k
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:17 pm

Post by flanker12k » Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:12 pm

as for nader

http://www.realchange.org/index.htm

that's what made me cast doubt on him, for the most part i'm willing to listen to counter-arguements to what this site has said about nader....

I don't know what it is specifically, but I don't trust ANY politician, going to "work" in the district of criminals....

just wondering, what's nader's stance on the federal reserve, and 2nd amendment?

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Post by Ry » Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:37 am

you can see from that site it said he unquestionably tipped the scales to BUsh from Gore. That is just bullshit. First off its a free election and people can vote for who they want gore and bush are not entitled to votes. Secondly Nader took votes from Republicans more in New Hampshire so had he not run that state would have gone to Bush and he drew evenly from Florida from Republicans and Democrats.

Gore cost himself the election when he chose Joe Liberman as his running-mate but it would go against leftist psychology for them to accept responsibility for something so they blame Nader.

Nader has a lot of money because he is a lawyer. So what, what the hell is wrong with that, should he be piss poor?

I have moeny in the stock market, so what? Not every companies on earth has sweatshops and abuses people. In fact people should support things like Citgo gas from Venezuela.

The site charges he is a hypocrite for holding stocks while bashing malcorporatism. Well he does not have stock in the mal-corporate companies. There is the hole in that half ass argument.

The site charges that by running for president he detracted from the issues. That is crap. Ask yourself this, did you ever hear about Ralph Nader or the Green Party BEFORE he ran for President? Running an unwinnable race was brilliant because it took to the message to more than who ever would have heard it otherwise.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

Post Reply