This is what i'm picking up on the false flag chatter.

Current events, politics, and more.
flanker12k
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:17 pm

This is what i'm picking up on the false flag chatter.

Post by flanker12k » Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:44 pm

I may sound like a complete nut but I HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO BE VIGILANT against potentially more false flags.......thus the following

btw if you notice there IS a pattern to these potential false flag events........
Lt. Col. Mike Milord
PAO, National Guard Bureau

Dear LTC Milord,

What's below affects you and all other National Guard members. All others on this list have received a copy previously, and copies of this email will are currently being distributed as an internet media release. Best regards, CPTMAY

CaptainMay <[email protected]> wrote:
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
CC: Ambassador Chase Untermeyer <[email protected]>,
[email protected], Agent Skip Midcap <[email protected]>,
HPD-CID <[email protected]>, HPD-IAD <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
From: CaptainMay <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [GhostTroopCommand] RED ALERT: "CHICAGO 911" CONFIRMED (May 2-4, Terror Exercises)



RED ALERT: "CHICAGO 911" CONFIRMED (May 2-4, Terror Exercises)
By Capt. Eric H. May, MI/PAO, Ghost Troop Commander

I will answer email queries to the information below, and will provide documentation and links. This email/article is now part of official record in the Texas City Nuclear Inquest at http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/GhostTroopCommand/. CPTMAY

Witnesses:
Colonel Tim Franklin, PAO, Illinois National Guard
Captain Lisa Kopczynski, PAO, Indiana National Guard
Officer Kubiak, Chicago Police Public Information Officer
In the last 24 hours, the police and military officers in above have confirmed the following exercise scenario, about to be conducted in Chicago:

Homeland Security is the "main proponent" (the command) for an exercise May 2-4, 2006, rehearsing a response to a WMD attack and building collapse in Downtown Chicago. State of Illinois civil assets, National Guard assets, Chicago area police assets and hospital assets will collectively be working under Homeland Security.

This is an uncomfortable confirmation of the alarming email/article I received, and promised to forward to you:

Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:31:45 -0700
From: "Amy Sasser" <[email protected]>
To: Mik <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: THREE Stage Terror Drill to Take Place in Chicago: May 2-4

Webster Tarpley was also taking about this on crisis radio yesterday it is in the archives of www.rbnlive.com

http://www.lonelantern.org/police_state_reports.html

THREE Stage Terror Drill to Take Place in Chicago: May 2-4

Gary Franchi - Chicago, IL 4-20-06 One of our Loyal Lone Lanterns has just informed us that the National Guard will be doing a training assignment in Chicago. This field exercise will be to simulate a chemical attack, whereby the National Guard will coordinate with local police, fire depts, and hospitals. One of the hospitals participating will be Rush.
1) Exercise starts as a response to a pandemic spreading throughout Chicago. It could be anything from a terrorist attack to bird flu. Nobody knows.
2) As the different groups are responding to this pandemic, there is a dirty bomb attack which releases a chemical agent.
3) If all of that is not enough, the dirty bomb collapses a building.
We do not have an exact location where this is happening, the National Guard doesn't even know. It is supposed to simulate a real life situation so, nobody knows until it starts.
It will be May 2-4.
Considering that "drills" were taking place the morning of 9/11 and 7/7 there is always the remote possibility that this is cover for another "inside job". We pray to God that it is not.
Chicago, be alert that Tuesday, May 2nd, Wednesday, May 3rd, and Thursday, May 4th


[Back to Military/Police] In light of this email, and my own independent work in the area of an attack on Chicago, I believe you are in imminent danger of attack. I believe you are being set up. It's that simple.

My background qualifies me to make the assessment I'm making. I spent five years (1989-1994) with the USAR's 75th Division (Exercise) in Houston, conducting dozens of command staff and exercise scenarios like the one in which you are preparing to participate. I worked as an Blue Force (US) and a Red Force (OPFOR) controller, then later as the Public Affairs Officer. Later I wrote editorials for NBC's Houston affiliate, KPRC-TV and published military analysis for the Houston Chronicle. In 1996, I interviewed with Karen Hughes to become the Bush speech writer, back when he was governor of Texas. I'm connected and I'm aware.


Sears Tower 666 scenario

The reason the internet community brought me the email/article news you have confirmed is that I've been working on the prospects of a 911-style attack on Chicago for over a month now. I began shortly after the Chicago Sun-Times' Frank Main published an article about new terror fears because of apparent surveillance of the Sears Tower: http://www.chicagoredstreak.com/output/ ... ror17.html

Shortly afterward, I published my first article about the prospect of a Chicago 911 set-up for the Adelaide Institute, Australia. The specific date was March 30, 2006. The top half of the article involves similar terror drills being conducted near Texas City back in January, but the bottom half of the article is a specific warning of a Chicago 911. My specific scenario is that of a Sears Tower attack on June 6, 2006, giving the study the code-name of Sears Tower 666. It has been widely reprinted in several countries. Here's the Aussie version: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissen ... uclear.htm

I've given interviews on the scenario, my most recent being on international radio yesterday, before receiving confirmation this morning that our worst fears were coming true. You can find it on the home page of Cloak and Dagger radio (Canada/Germany), or via the direct link at http://www.cloakanddagger.de/lenny/ghos ... papr26.htm


Will the "Chicago 911" Exercises "go live?"

The exercise you are conducting may "go live" and result in tens of thousands of civilian casualties. Whatever you are preparing for as a casualty count should be taken as the best indicator of the level of mass murder actually being anticipated. It needs to be enough to rally the country behind Bush, and that means plenty of dead folks, at this point.

I believe that whatever information and security protocols you are observing relevant to this exercise are just so many prior-planned impediment to your discovering what it happening -- until after it has happened. At that point you'll be in crisis mode, operating by training, not asking questions about the official story.

The idea that political leaders resort to dire measures in dire political troubles is not new, or disloyal. Responsible military officers were advised to be on guard against just such a contingency when Nixon's poll numbers and political prospects pointed toward impeachment, and these signs are present for Bush as well. Pro-Bush media are now speculating that the only "miracle" that can save him is another 911, and former White House insiders like Paul Craig Roberts are writing articles expressing my idea that his former employer may be contemplating false-flag terror to save his presidency: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/GhostT ... essage/111


Texas City Nuclear 911 Inquest

The same thing now in danger of happening in Chicago almost happened in Texas City on January 31, 2006. My intelligence unit, Ghost Troop, and I were heavily engaged in late January in a national/international public affairs campaign to alert the area, specifically warning of the prospect of a 1/31 nuke attack being set up against the city.

Our work was confirmed in an article in the Galveston County Daily News on Feb. 2, 2006, which reported that national WMD-CRT "day after" assets were present in the target area on the day after our Jan. 31, 2006 prediction, on Feb. 1, 2006. The public, made aware by our public affairs campaign to get the message out, were quite alarmed, but at least they weren't dead. As with Chicago's May 2-4 exercises, the Texas City exercises were under wraps, an adjunct of an exercise being run from Jan. 31-Feb. 2 by Ft. Monroe, Virginia and Charleston, South Carolina. Like your exercise, they were run from a Tuesday to a Thursday.

The Texas City articles, by mainstream Daily News writer TJ Aulds and cyber-jounalist Greg Szymanski, can be accessed -- along with my real-time interviews -- at our 2005-2006 main operations site: http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia ... aptMay.htm


Mission of Conscience, w/ References & Request

I am a Christian former Armed Forces officer, on a mission of conscience, serving in obedience to my oath of commissioning, I urge you to reflect prayerfully on your own oaths of commissioning, made to defend and protect the constitution. Before beginning this current analytic stretch, I had myself baptized by Fr. Raphael Garcia and Fr. James Marshall in the Sagrado Corazon Church of El Paso on July 11, 2005. My certificate of baptism, widely circulated as part of my media kit when I interview, is given under "emergency" conditions, meaning that the good priests who baptized me knew exactly what I was going up against: possible assassination by my own side. I copy them and all other principle involved contacts via BCC.

I request that you regard this notice as a military "CRITC" report, meaning that it is of critical importance, and should be forwarded as widely as possible, all the way up the chain of command. This applies equally to all military/police recipients of this communique, and is emphatic. I am asserting extraordinary powers, but as an officer in my position, I have no choice. Any other responsible US officer, given my training and presented this emergency, would be obliged to do the same.

If I am correct in my documented analysis and prediction, extending from the fearful Texas City results to the fearful Chicago possibilities, then the constitution is under attack, and the American People are in danger. All my actions have been vindicated by the results, and history will vindicate those who asked the hard questions for their country instead of looking the other way. Now is the time to do your duty according to the constitution -- even if it means asking questions after you are told to stand down, or spreading word of the prospect of a false-flag terror attack. You have been trained, as I was, to stand up on a mission of conscience when the time came. It has come.


Your brother in oath and duty,

Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action

PS: Below I attach two VIP references, coinfirmed via their emails to me:

First, Thom Shanker, Chief Pentagon Correspondent, NY Times, who was a constant contact until I went public on the matter of the Battle of Baghdad cover-up, and the July, 2003 Bush attacks on his critics:

Thom Shanker <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:35:47 -0500
To: Eric May <[email protected]>
From: Thom Shanker <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Dissident officer accuses White House of cover-up

Captain May,

In the interest of holiday understanding, I have to ask: After treating you with respect, as opposed to the hostile notes I know you have gotten from other members of the news media, why do you choose to insult me, as you did in the note you sent out? Such action is beneath a professional soldier such as you.

Regards,
Thom

At 05:26 PM 12/23/2003 -0800, you wrote:

My name is Captain Eric H. May, and I am making the flat allegation that the Bush White House covered up the Battle of Baghdad with the Private Jessica scam. Please be so kind as to visit the site I brough on line two days ago: www.geocities.com/onlythecaptain/

If you find the evidence of interest, kindly contact me via this email. I am copying this letter to Thom Shanker, chief pentagon correspondent for the New York Times. Thom knows about the cover up, but is afraid to tell -- all the mainstream media are. You already knew you couldn't trust them, didn't you?

With your permission, I'll include you in my daily column, If I May, an analysis of war news from a former intelligence and public affairs officer. If you don't want me to contact you again, kindly send a message.

Best regards,
Captain May


Thom Shanker
Pentagon correspondent
The New York Times
202/862-0323

Second, the US Ambassador to Qatar, Chase Untermeyer, who serves as my Ghost Troop chaplain -- at his own request -- and is my official witness. Ambassador Untermeyer and I are good friends, and he served as my best man at my wedding. He has been a witness to the Ghost Troop activities on the Texas City scenario since we first began to work on it in March, 2004. As you can see from this recent email, we are in regular contact, and plan to meet when he visits home this summer.

"Untermeyer, Chase G." <[email protected]> wrote:
From: "Untermeyer, Chase G." <[email protected]>
To: CaptainMay <[email protected]>
Subject: Gracias
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:45:44 +0300


ERIC: God to hear from you. I usually get emails on Blackberries rather than on blackberries. I hope to see you when Im back in Houston sometime around the 4th of July. I know I wont be able to change your mind on the Bush Administration (or much else), but we can certainly agree on Gretchens preserves on fresh biscuits. (Which side, though?) Till then, CHASE.
Ambassador Untermeyer is mentioned extensively throughout the Texas City Nuclear Inquest. In fact, I only began the inquest after receiving a question from him that led me to calculate the odds against our Texas City work being random chance, and that email is the first message entry in the articles that comprise the inquest: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/GhostT ... message/91

User avatar
k
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1305
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:57 am

Post by k » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:22 am

It's a false flag and complete BS. tell him that.
Image

User avatar
Redelicious
Protesting War
Protesting War
Posts: 236
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 1:55 pm

Post by Redelicious » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:23 am

seems like they would hit the West Coast next.
The original anti-neoconImage

Boycott Israel. Don't back down Norway. We back you up.

User avatar
Terrorcell
Anti-Neocon novice
Anti-Neocon novice
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 9:12 am
Location: On the Departmen of Homeland Security's "Watchlist"

Post by Terrorcell » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 am

Correct me if I'm mistake but didn't Silverstein purchase the lease for the Sears Tower some time shortly after 9/11?

User avatar
Effendi
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Earth

Yes indeed...

Post by Effendi » Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:38 pm

Terrorcell wrote:Correct me if I'm mistake but didn't Silverstein purchase the lease for the Sears Tower some time shortly after 9/11?
Here is an article in the Wall Street Journal from March 12, 2004 regarding MetLife's selling of the building!!


Two investors who are part of Larry Silverstein's group that owns the World Trade Center lease are among the buyers of the Sears Tower, which MetLife Inc. agreed to sell Thursday for more than $800 million, according to people familiar with the situation.

Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre, New York investors who are among Mr. Silverstein's backers in the Trade Center, are part of a group that agreed to buy the Chicago landmark, these people said. Another New York investor, Jeffrey Feil, was also a participant in the Sears Tower deal, the people said. Names of the other investors couldn't be learned.

MetLife announced the agreement Thursday, but declined to disclose the buyer or the terms, citing a confidentiality agreement. While the insurance company, based in New York, had previously announced its intention to sell the tower, the speed of the deal and the relatively high price caught the real-estate industry off-guard.

MetLife said it would realize an after-tax gain of $90 million on the deal.

Messrs. Goldman and Carye couldn't be reached. Attempts to reach Mr. Feil were unsuccessful. The names of the three investors were reported Thursday on the Slatin Report, a Web newsletter.

Mr. Goldman led a group including Mr. Cayre that put up most of the $125 million of the equity that Mr. Silverstein, a New York developer, used to buy the 99-year office lease on the Trade Center office portion from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The deal, valued at $3.2 billion, including the Trade Center's retail mall, closed in July 2001, weeks before the September terror attacks that destroyed the complex.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Port Authority in December had quietly agreed to return all of the $125 million in equity that Mr. Silverstein and his low-profile group originally invested to buy the leases. The full details of that transaction haven't been released to the public. But the deal effectively eliminated the Silverstein group's capital risk in the project, while allowing the group to retain control of 10 million square feet of office space. The Port Authority has rejected a Wall Street Journal request to review the transaction, citing Mr. Silverstein's ongoing lawsuit against his insurers, led by Swiss Reinsurance Co., over how many claims may be collected as a result of the attacks.
In this media blitz that today we call cyberspace, so much alternative information is presented by clever poseurs on all levels claiming that it’s not Jews, it’s Zionists; it’s not Jews, it’s Neocons; it’s not Jews, it’s Communists; it’s not Jews, it’s the Illuminati. Wise up, my friend. All of those labels are synonyms for Judaism, which is not really a religion, but a crime scheme. It gives one demonstrably insane group of people the right to rob and kill everyone else, and they’ve been so clever at it FOR FIVE THOUSAND YEARS, most people don’t even notice

flanker12k
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:17 pm

Post by flanker12k » Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:47 pm

kassana wrote:It's a false flag and complete BS. tell him that.

They know it's bush-co behind the "terrorist attacks"

User avatar
Effendi
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Earth

More 411

Post by Effendi » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:21 pm

Since 9/11/01 Sears Tower has become a losing real estate proposition.


Week of November 11, 2002
Appraisal, Rents Down, Some Tenants Defecting
That different light is particularly glaring when it comes to dollars and cents.
Trizec in its third quarter wrote down $48.3 million of the $70 million it invested in the Sears Tower in the '97 deal. Prompting that write-down, Callahan explained, were persistent post-9/11 concerns over signature properties' diminished appeal and lower rents.
The market seems to mirror those concerns. The 110-story Sears Tower was recently appraised at $826 million, a sharp drop from 2001's $911-million appraisal.
Moreover, some high-profile tenants are defecting, countering earlier reports that Sept. 11's attacks were having no impact on Sears Tower's occupancy.
The skyscraper's rental fees are also falling. Sears Tower rents have dropped by 25 percent, a 15 percent steeper drop than the overall reduction in the Second City's office market, Chicago analysts have reported.
http://www.siteselection.com/ssinsider/ ... 021111.htm



Sears Tower likely to go to its lender
By Thomas A. Corfman
Tribune Staff Reporter
(c) Chicago Tribune, July 11, 2003


Still struggling for tenants nearly two years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Sears Tower will be handed over to its lender to prevent the skyscraper's owner from defaulting on its massive mortgage, sources close to the deal said Thursday.

Anxiety over a possible terrorist attack on the world's second-tallest building has dramatically reduced the attractiveness of the 110-story tower to some existing tenants and many prospective ones.

As a result, the tower's market value has dropped, and the building now is unlikely to be worth the value of the outstanding loans when they come due, forcing a likely default by owner Trizec Properties Inc.

Chicago-based Trizec plans to transfer ownership of the tower to lender MetLife Inc., the large New York-based life insurance company, sources said. The two sides are expected to announce the deal sometime in August.

MetLife Inc. has praised Trizec's management of the skyscraper during the 22 months since the destruction of New York's World Trade Center. And as part of the building's return, MetLife is expected to retain Trizec as the manager of the 3.7-million-square-foot tower, sources said.


Debt, 9/11 fears shadow landmark

The cloud of 9/11 continues to shadow the tower, located at 233 S. Wacker Drive. Since the attacks, many tenants have talked openly about their fears that the tallest building on Chicago's skyline will become a terrorist target.

"You can completely forget about Sept. 11, but as soon as you go back into that building, you think about it again," said Alain LeCoque, managing principal of the Chicago office of Newmark & Co. Real Estate Inc., which represents tenants looking for office space.

At the same time, continuing softness in the downtown office market has given current and prospective Sears Tower tenants plenty of alternatives that are cheaper and less worrisome.

High-profile companies that plan to move out of the tower include local offices of the Goldman Sachs & Co. investment bank, Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co., which will keep a small office there.

"It's one of the best buildings in the country, but the reality is that after Sept. 11 people look at the building differently," said Michael O'Hanlon, executive vice president of Northbrook-based Grubb & Ellis Co., a real estate firm. "Over time, that perception will change."

But not in time for Trizec, sources said. The building owner's debt, which totals $760 million, including accrued but unpaid interest, comes due July 2, 2005. In a highly leveraged 1997 deal, Trizec paid $70 million to gain control of the tower, subject to MetLife's mortgage.

In November, Trizec wrote down its initial investment in the tower to $23.6 million. Trizec could lose some or all of its investment, depending on its deal with MetLife.

A MetLife spokeswoman declined to comment Thursday. A Trizec spokesman said the firm also would not discuss the status of the talks, adding: "We continue to work with MetLife to reach a resolution that would be good for both parties, and for our tenants."

Sears Tower is generating enough cash to keep Trizec current with its mortgage payments. Many of the tenants, including some that are leaving, have long-term leases. The building was 89.2 percent leased in the first quarter.

Trizec's problems also reflect its decision to buy the tower with a large amount of debt, or leverage. "Any real estate that you buy with 90 percent leverage, if the market goes up, you're a big winner," said analyst Jim Sullivan of California-based Green Street Advisors Inc., who has pressed Trizec to surrender the tower. "And if the market goes down, you get wiped out pretty quickly."

The nationwide downturn in the office market has hurt Trizec more than many office-building companies because of the Chicago firm's high debt level, about 65 percent of total company value. As a result, Trizec investors are likely to be pleased with the return of the tower.

Handing back the well-known tower would be a setback for Timothy Callahan, who became Trizec's chief executive in August and who has been trying to guide the company toward a revival. Callahan had hoped to persuade MetLife to restructure the loan, which charges interest at rates above current levels.

Trizec had threatened to walk away from the tower, betting that the conservative life insurance company would readily renegotiate the debt rather than take title to the tower, given its uncertain value. But MetLife executives are said to have been unmoved.

Nonetheless, the negotiations have been cordial, as shown by the likelihood that Trizec will continue to manage the building. Earlier this year, Trizec said its annual Sears Tower management fees and leasing commission would range from $2 million to $4 million.

The decision to give up Sears Tower also will be a test of Callahan's leadership. Several top Trizec executives believe the massive building would regain its value before the debt came due. And many Trizec employees who work in the tower have become emotionally attached to the skyscraper since the terrorist attacks.

Though Callahan shared that sentiment, his decision to hand back the building reflects a more dispassionate view of the trophy tower. At a June 4 conference with investors, he hinted at Though Callahan shared that sentiment, his decision to hand back the building reflects a more dispassionate view of the trophy tower. At a June 4 conference with investors, he hinted at the outcome of the talks with MetLife.

"For us, fundamentally, it comes down to [do] we believe that over time Sears can regain the value it once had?" he said, according to a transcript of the conversation. "It certainly has been hurt as much as any asset that I'm aware of in regards to post-9/11."

http://www.searstower.org/news.html

User avatar
Effendi
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Earth

And this..

Post by Effendi » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:22 pm

Police probing suspicious activity around Loop buildings By John Garcia
March 16, 2006 - Chicago police are investigating cases of suspicious activity at two Loop buildings. One of them is the Sears Tower.

Since 9-11, the Sears Tower in particular has turned up on several lists of possible targets for terrorists. ABC7 news has reported sightings of suspicious looking individuals photographing the building numerous times in the past several years. Law enforcement officials have always publicly downplayed these incidents and they attempted to do that again Thursday.
Sears Tower employees Thursday reportedly received bulletins from building management reassuring them that there is no terror threat. But those bulletins failed to explain the incident ABC7 reported, that three suspicious looking men in a rental car pulled up to the building recently, got out and began studying the building. According to law enforcement sources, they took pictures before building security ran them off, but they never got their identification. Those sources tell ABC7 the car was rented to a fake name.

The entire incident was captured on building security video, which was turned over to members of the Joint Terrorism Task Force.

A Sears Tower spokesman said Thursday the men were not taking pictures. He issued a statement saying "investigators later reported back to Sears Tower security that they had no reason to believe the activity was criminal or cause for any further concern."

Law enforcement sources however have told ABC7 news the investigation is ongoing and they have been unable to identify the men from the video.

Sources also say a second suspicious incident at the Boeing corporate offices is also under investigation. This time a lone man, reportedly suspicious looking, was seen sketching the building. Security questioned him and took pictures of his sketch, though they never got his ID. A Boeing spokesman Thursday confirmed they reported it to authorities who have been conducting an investigation.

FBI spokesman Ross Rice says the Sears Tower incident actually happened several months ago. He contradicts the information from our sources. Ross said investigators were able to trace the car outside the Sears Tower to a real person who they determined was not a threat.

But this incident is just the latest of a number of similar ones we have reported on over the last few years.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?sectio ... id=4000193

User avatar
Effendi
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Earth

And this last week also...

Post by Effendi » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:24 pm

FBI Denies Media Reports Of Danger At Sears Tower
Submitted by editor4 on March 17, 2006 - 4:23pm.
By Rudolph Bush and David Heinzmann
Source: Chicago Tribune

The FBI on Thursday refuted media reports that a terrorism investigation was under way into an incident involving three men who behaved suspiciously outside the Sears Tower.

While three men did stop near a loading dock at the tower in October, they were not a threat, FBI spokesman Ross Rice said.

A brief story about the incident appeared in some editions of Thursday's Tribune, and a Chicago television station ran a similar report.

The Tribune article incorrectly reported that three men took photographs of the building about three weeks ago and were driving a rental car that was leased under a false name.

The men never took any photographs, Rice said Thursday. They were immediately approached by Sears Tower security officers and asked to leave. Chicago police investigated the incident and determined the men were not a threat, Rice said.

The men were driving a rental car that was leased to one of the men under his name, not a false name, Rice said.

Mark Spencer, Sears Tower spokesman, also said that investigators did not believe there was any criminal activity.

"Contrary to news reports, the men were not taking pictures of any kind and this did not happen three weeks ago. The men left, as instructed," Spencer said in the statement.

"Sears Tower security staff works with local and federal law enforcement officials on a regular basis on any number of issues, large and small. We are confident that local and federal investigators remain diligent in investigating anything suspicious we report to them, whether it ends up being cause for concern or not," the statement read.

http://mediachannel.org/blog/node/3725

User avatar
Effendi
Speaking out
Speaking out
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Earth

And then we all remember this...

Post by Effendi » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:24 pm

MORE SUSPICIOUS ISRAELI "MOVERS"
DETAINED WITH DETAILED VIDEO OF SEARS TOWER

SOURCE: THE MERCURY (PHILADEPHIA AREA NEWSPAPER),
POTTSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
www.zwire.com/site/mercury_101801.html

MICHELLE MOWAD, Special to The Mercury, October 17, 2001
PLYMOUTH (PA) -- Two men whom police described as Middle Eastern were detained in the township by federal immigration authorities after being found with detailed video footage of the Sears Tower in Chicago.

Plymouth Police encountered the men after an officer responded to Pizzeria Uno on West Ridge Pike at 2:40 p.m. Thursday for a report of illegal dumping.

A manager there advised the police officer that a tractor-trailer was observed backed up to the dumpster at the rear of the restaurant. The manager noticed a freshly dumped pile of furniture adjacent to the Dumpster, according to police. The manager confronted the vehicle's operator, a Middle Eastern man, police said.

The man, who later identified himself as Moshe Elmakias, 30, denied that he did anything and fled the scene, heading west on West Ridge Pike... The manager was able to provide township police with the Florida registration number of the tractor-trailer and said that a sign posted on the side of the vehicle read "Moving Systems Incorporated" police said.

The area was searched by township police, and the vehicle was spotted parked on the curb in front of John Kennedy Ford on Ridge Pike. An officer proceeded to make contact with the occupants of the truck by knocking on the cab, according to reports.

A Middle Eastern man, later identified as Ron Katar, 23, exited the sleeper area of the cab and said that the operator was across the street as he pointed toward the Don Rosen Porsche dealer, reports said.

Elmakias and a white female, Ayelet Reisler, 23, were approaching the vehicle from the dealership, but the female then began walking in a different direction, acting as if she were not with Elmakias, according to reports. Reisler was detained and checked for identification. She had a German passport in her name and medication in a different name, police said. Plymouth Police Sgt. Thomas Longo was notified and responded to the incident.

Elmakias allegedly admitted to being behind Pizzeria Uno, although he said that he did not dump furniture, he was only turning around. Elmakias said that his destination was New York and that he was also coming from New York. He said he was in Plymouth because he was supposed to make a pickup in the morning and pointed toward the Storage USA facility on Belvoir Road , police said. Elmakias could not, however, provide a name or telephone number of the customer.

Township police dispatched a request for a Motor Carrier Program Inspector. Officer Gerald Schwartz of the Whitpain Police Department responded. Schwartz discovered through his investigation that the operator's log had been falsified and put the truck out of service due to violations. Inspection of the tractor-trailer's contents revealed a load three-quarters full containing household items, including furniture and boxes. Among the items in the truck was a Sony video camera. Plymouth Police Officer David McCann reviewed the tape found inside the camera. The tape had video footage of Chicago with zoomed-in shots of the Sears Tower, according to police.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was notified of the incident and all three subjects were transported to the Plymouth Police station. FBI Agents James Sweeney and Richard Tofani arrived at the station and proceeded to investigate both the subjects and their belongings with the assistance of Immigration and Naturalization Services. All evidence collected by Plymouth and Whitpain officers was transferred to federal facilities. Special Agent Linda Vizi, a spokeswoman for the Philadelphia FBI, could not be contacted for comment on further investigations.

* The names of the 3 "Middle Easterners" named above are clearly of Israeli-Jewish origin.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/sears2.html
In this media blitz that today we call cyberspace, so much alternative information is presented by clever poseurs on all levels claiming that it’s not Jews, it’s Zionists; it’s not Jews, it’s Neocons; it’s not Jews, it’s Communists; it’s not Jews, it’s the Illuminati. Wise up, my friend. All of those labels are synonyms for Judaism, which is not really a religion, but a crime scheme. It gives one demonstrably insane group of people the right to rob and kill everyone else, and they’ve been so clever at it FOR FIVE THOUSAND YEARS, most people don’t even notice

Post Reply