9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst fire.

Current events, politics, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
Eazy
Fights PNAC daily
Fights PNAC daily
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:39 pm

9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst fire.

Post by Eazy » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:33 am

Do a search on YouTube for building 5 there isn't many videos of it.
But one leaves a major question. Youtube Search (World Trade Center never seen before) the users channel is (StephenMcCaffrey64) Its interesting to note that this building has never been used in any truth videos either, well any that i have seen anyway. It takes away the question of how much fire a steel structure building can handle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfWSjb8R7lk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; So here's the direct link to it Enjoy.
When Injustice becomes Law Resistance becomes Duty.

Give more than you get and you will get more than you need.
This works both ways for good and bad.

User avatar
pro-Gentile
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 am

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by pro-Gentile » Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:18 am

Thanks.

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by Ry » Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:29 am

I mentioned B5 and B6 in all roads lead to israel.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

Raoul
Smashing neocons
Smashing neocons
Posts: 1585
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:59 am

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by Raoul » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:08 am

and then theres guys like this:


Ry, you need to crush these strawman deniers and kooks all the same.
All Politics is a Meme War

User avatar
Ry
Super Anti-Neocon
Super Anti-Neocon
Posts: 34478
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by Ry » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:13 am

am just wait a couple more days.
Get The Empire Unmasked here

User avatar
Eazy
Fights PNAC daily
Fights PNAC daily
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:39 pm

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by Eazy » Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:16 am

Ry wrote:I mentioned B5 and B6 in all roads lead to israel.
Check this out then. Maybe you could add this to your Doco, I don't think anyone has used other steel type structures burning from fuel fires like this in a doco yet. Just some still pics of this should do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEK8EtqV ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

My point is if steel is so week then how did they have time to get 3 or 4 ships to there in time to squirt it down?
Oil Platforms are made of steel, Not titanium. Look at the size of the flames also burning a fuel way hotter than 9/11
WIKI detail here. It dose not explain how long the fire went for but the fact that the ships got there says something, It must have been at least 2-3 hours. Flames hundreds of feet high. Those ships can't even get close enough to wet it.
If steel was so week why would they even attempt to put it out?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_ ... _oil_spill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This Flick shows the Rig burning into the night meaning it must have been lit up for more than 5,6 hours.



I know your not going to do another Doco for a while but you may just do a separate talk on it, I think its a good argument tool to have as far as the strength of structural steel.
When Injustice becomes Law Resistance becomes Duty.

Give more than you get and you will get more than you need.
This works both ways for good and bad.

User avatar
pro-Gentile
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
End the occupationS. Yes, all of them.
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 am

Re: 9/11 what about Building 5, clearly suffered the worst f

Post by pro-Gentile » Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:05 am

Eazy wrote:
Ry wrote:I mentioned B5 and B6 in all roads lead to israel.
Check this out then. Maybe you could add this to your Doco, I don't think anyone has used other steel type structures burning from fuel fires like this in a doco yet. Just some still pics of this should do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEK8EtqV ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

My point is if steel is so week then how did they have time to get 3 or 4 ships to there in time to squirt it down?
Oil Platforms are made of steel, Not titanium. Look at the size of the flames also burning a fuel way hotter than 9/11
WIKI detail here. It dose not explain how long the fire went for but the fact that the ships got there says something, It must have been at least 2-3 hours. Flames hundreds of feet high. Those ships can't even get close enough to wet it.
If steel was so week why would they even attempt to put it out?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_ ... _oil_spill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This Flick shows the Rig burning into the night meaning it must have been lit up for more than 5,6 hours.



I know your not going to do another Doco for a while but you may just do a separate talk on it, I think its a good argument tool to have as far as the strength of structural steel.
"When Injustice becomes Law Resistance becomes Duty."

Yes it does.

Post Reply