Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
-
- Speaking out
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
why isn't the civilized world worried about isreal having nukes
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
What strikes me is the comfort and confidence which they use the words pre-emptive strike. Plus they talk about "the world" as if people really care.
We're already in war. It hasn't affected us, in the west, yet because we are the agressors.
We're already in war. It hasn't affected us, in the west, yet because we are the agressors.
Check your slides
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
Troop build up in Iraq, just met with G8 and Netanyahu... yeah I would say a false flag is ripe in the making. Maybe in Chicago this time? Seems to be Obama's hood.
Get The Empire Unmasked here
-
- Revolutionary Party
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:37 pm
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
^thisBender wrote:There's still a nuke lost.
The MSM hardly talked about that Minot mess and when people bring it up they call them conspiracy theorists (what else is new?)
If it's conspiracy then it's conspiracy FACT. Nuclear weapons are impossible to lose. We're talking about weapons of MASS destruction capable of destroying towns, cities, counties, and if you build a Czar Bomba even states. You don't accidentally fly with them across the country and leave them unsecured on a runway. It's impossible! IMPOSSIBLE!! All those mysterious deaths linked to the incident, stuff like that isn't an accident.
-
- Revolutionary Party
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:37 pm
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
I was reading about the Iran-Contra affair earlier and while reading Wikipedia's article on the matter noticed that it looks like history is being re-written. When it comes to Zionist influence, Wikipedia is terrible (and their activity/influence is in the history and talk pages for all to see!) but regarding Iran-Contra it claims that selling arms to Iran was intended to free hostages from Hezbollah in Lebanon (in addition to funding the Contras). WHAT?!
Most Iranians are Shia, as is Hezbollah. And Iran has been said to have provided training and funds to Hezbollah (so have other nations besides Iran). But Hezbollah wasn't organized in 1986 from what I understand (and contrary to Hezbollah's article on Wikipedia). There were Shia resistance groups during Lebanon's civil war obviously, including Hezbollah. The Western media blamed the "Islamic Jihad Organization" for the barracks bombing in 1983 and for many kidnapping which would've occurred around the time of Iran-Contra (Wikipedia lumps this under Hezbollah) but I highly doubt Iran was behind this. The only thing they likely had in common was religion. That whole Civil War was Israel's fault anyways.
Somebody really wants to destroy Iran and is revises history even
Most Iranians are Shia, as is Hezbollah. And Iran has been said to have provided training and funds to Hezbollah (so have other nations besides Iran). But Hezbollah wasn't organized in 1986 from what I understand (and contrary to Hezbollah's article on Wikipedia). There were Shia resistance groups during Lebanon's civil war obviously, including Hezbollah. The Western media blamed the "Islamic Jihad Organization" for the barracks bombing in 1983 and for many kidnapping which would've occurred around the time of Iran-Contra (Wikipedia lumps this under Hezbollah) but I highly doubt Iran was behind this. The only thing they likely had in common was religion. That whole Civil War was Israel's fault anyways.
Somebody really wants to destroy Iran and is revises history even
Re: Vice PM: Strike on Iran could be necessary
exactly it pretty commonsense. But in our government they manage to lose weapons and trillion in cash all the time. Black markets thrive. How the fuck does on emisplace a nuclear warhead?Nuclear weapons are impossible to lose.
Get The Empire Unmasked here